Why the DEEP STATE Will Select TRUMP in 2024

Black Pigeon Speaks

12 min

1 hr ago

>>20278481

>So it's ISRAEL who's behind the DS.

is that somehow incorrect?

>>20278728

how is knowing that Israel/Mossad is behind international political blackmail, espionage, and extortion 'dying'? It would seem, just in general family, work, and friend interaction alone that noticing is waaaaay on the rise. Especially since Epstein and Gaza.

https://www.rt.com/news/590984-trump-zelensky-ukraine-us/

Trump’s pledge ‘a little scary’ – Zelensky

The Ukrainian leader says he wants to hear how the former US president would end the conflict with Russia in 24 hours

Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky has voiced concern that Donald Trump’s plan for swiftly ending the conflict between Kiev and Moscow might not take Kiev’s interests into account.

In an interview with the UK’s Channel 4 News on Friday, Zelensky was asked to comment on the former US president’s repeated claim that if he returns to the White House following this year’s election, he will end the fighting between Russia and Ukraine in just 24 hours.

“I don't know if his message… will have such [a] positive result as he said,” the Ukrainian leader remarked in English. It could be just a “political message” made by a candidate during the “complicated” election period, “but if it's some formula – I have to know it,” he said.

The reporter then asked the Ukrainian leader if he wanted to invite Trump to arrive in Kiev in person to explain his plan.

“Yes, please, Donald Trump, I invite you to Ukraine, to Kiev. So, if you can stop the war during 24 hours I think it will be enough to come, on any day,” he said.

‘I got along with Putin’ – Trump

Read more

‘I got along with Putin’ – Trump

Zelensky then clarified his stance in Ukrainian, saying he was concerned that if Trump takes office again “he’ll make decisions [regarding the conflict] on his own… without both sides, without us. I will now talk about us. Why? Because if he says this publicly, it’s a little scary.”

If Trump’s idea of ending the fighting in 24 hours “which no one has heard about… will not work for us, for our people, then he will do everything to achieve the implementation of his idea anyway. And this is what worries me a little,” the Ukrainian leader stressed.

Addressing a crowd of his supporters in Des Moines, Iowa, on Monday night, Trump said, “I know [Russian] President [Vladimir] Putin very well; I know Zelensky well. I’m gonna get them in; we’re gonna get it solved very quickly.”

On Thursday, in his interview with Fox News’ Sean Hannity, the former US president reiterated his other claim that “Putin would’ve never attacked Ukraine” if he was still in office.

When asked about ways to end the conflict in Ukraine last week, Trump’s eldest son, Donald Trump Jr., suggested that “the only way” to persuade Zelensky to engage in talks with Russia was to “cut off the money” that’s being provided to Kiev by Washington.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/wsj-editor-chief-admits-davos-elites-we-no-longer-own-news

WSJ Editor-in-Chief Admits To Davos Elites 'We No Longer Own The News'

Thanks to the internet and (shrinking) press freedoms, legacy media outlets no longer have a monopoly on information and narratives.

Case in point, during a WEF discussion at Davos entitled "Defending Truth," Wall St. Journal EIC Emma Tucker lamented this loss of control over 'the facts,' as Modernity.news reports.

"I think there’s a very specific challenge for the legacy brands, like the New York Times and like the Wall Street Journal," Tucker said, adding "If you go back really not that long ago, as I say, we owned the news. We were the gatekeepers, and we very much owned the facts as well."

"If it said it in the Wall Street Journal, the New York Times, then that was a fact," she continued, adding "Nowadays, people can go to all sorts of different sources for the news and they’re much more questioning about what we’re saying."

Watch:

At a discussion titled 'Defending Truth,' the WSJ editor-in-chief admitted to #Davos2024 #WorldEconomicForum elites that the legacy media no longer 'own the news', lamenting "We were the gatekeepers, and we very much owned the facts as well." Report here: https://t.co/FO3ASOIyuM pic.twitter.com/ukZKP4esNs

— m o d e r n i t y (@ModernityNews) January 19, 2024

Russia, Russia, Russia!

European Commission VP Věra Jourová also piped up during the same discussion, calling the rise of "disinformation" a "security threat," and suggesting that "It was part of the Russian military doctrine that they will start information war, and we are in it now."

Like when the Hillary Clinton campaign used a former (?) British spook's Russian source to fabricate a hoax against Donald Trump, which was peddled through the Wall Street Journal and every single other legacy media outlet? That kind of information war? Or when 51 former US intelligence officials used disinformation to influence the 2020 election, suggesting the NY Post's Hunter Biden laptop bombshell was Russian meddling?

"Disinformation is a very powerful tool," Jourová continued, adding that "In the EU we are focusing on improving of the system where the people will get the facts right. We don’t speak about opinions. We are not correcting anyone’s opinions or language. This is about the facts."

Bitch please.

VP of the EU at #Davos2024 on 'disinformation': "We are focusing on improving the system where the people will get the facts right…We are not correcting anyone's opinions or language. This is about the facts." Whose facts? Report: https://t.co/FO3ASOIyuM pic.twitter.com/nZGMQ9SH23

— m o d e r n i t y (@ModernityNews) January 19, 2024

More:

As we highlighted earlier in the week, Jourová has spent her Davos time meeting the heads of the likes of YouTube and Meta and ensuring they “play by the rules,” while her boss, Ursula von der Leyen called for overarching globalist control over the flow of all information in the digital age. -Modernity.news

Full discussion: #WorldEconomicForum panel at #Davos2024 talks about 'Defending Truth' with EU VP saying they wish to control "the facts," in the "information war," and the WSJ editor-in-chief lamenting that they 'no longer own the facts'. Report here: https://t.co/FO3ASOIyuM pic.twitter.com/zabZtj5ALL

— m o d e r n i t y (@ModernityNews) January 19, 2024

https://twitter.com/meantweeting1/status/1748885371839041541

Epstein's Sheet. 🧻

@meantweeting1

You never know what you might find showing up at your child's school unannounced…

1:24 / 2:20

7:49 PM · Jan 20, 2024

Putin stokes tensions with US, declares 1867 sale of Alaska 'illegal'

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/putin-stokes-tensions-with-us-declares-1867-sale-of-alaska-illegal/ar-BB1h1lcT

A brief history of how Alaska became part of the United States: Russia sold it in 1867 for $7.2 million, a deal considered to be mutually beneficial at that time. Nowadays, Alaska, a detached piece of the USA, stands as one of the fifty states constituting the country and has been an integral part of it for over 150 years. Nonetheless, the Russians aren't content with this.

Interestingly, Vladimir Putin appears to have rethought the sale of Alaska to the Americans. It's not a joke: he's trying to give the impression that his influence extends not only to his country's future events but also plans to rewrite the past. Therefore, he signed a decree rendering the sale of Alaska illegal.

This is likely the beginning of a request for its return from the United States.

Putin and his propaganda specialists persistently build an image of Russia as an empire that makes demands against its neighbors and, if unheeded, resorts to war and other consequences. As witnessed in previous years with Georgia and Moldova, Ukraine experienced similar tactics as it was attacked by its neighboring country in 2022.

It appears that Moscow has claims against the United States now.

Vladimir Putin signed a decree declaring the sale of Alaska to the USA as illegal. This action signals the start of a demand for the territory's return and potentially entering into conflict with the superpower. However, this is just political posturing today, and no rational person would suggest that Russia could assault the United States. Nonetheless, as the saying goes, a continuous drip can erode a stone.

"Before Americans seize our properties abroad, they should remember, we also have something to reclaim." - stated Vyacheslav Volodin, the chairman of the State Duma, during a plenary sitting in the summer of 2022. At the time, Russians reacted nervously to the US-imposed sanctions on Moscow.

This propaganda tactic may not intimidate Washington's authorities but perfectly illustrates the Kremlin's new approach to international politics and its respect for agreements. Today in Russia, a fact clear and not disputed for years - that the Americans purchased Alaska legally in 1867 for $7.2 million - means nothing.

Interestingly, Alaska plays a significant role in the relationship between both countries. The USAF bases and USARAK (American Arctic military forces) are stationed here. Centers found in Fort Greely and Eielson are equipped with advanced machinery through which Americans could quickly launch an attack on Russia, including nuclear warheads.

Notably, Russia employed a similar propaganda mechanism in the case of Crimea, which was legally transferred to Ukraine during the USSR era. The result of this incident under Vladimir Putin's regime is well known.