Tyb
Do you need any breads collected?
CHRIS SUNUNU - NIKKI HALEY
President Trump RIPS Chris Sununu for allowing Democrats to try and hijack the vote in New Hampshire. He also SLAMMED Nikki Haley for being a globalist sellout.
1:07
https://rumble.com/v48g8ru-chris-sununu-nikki-haley.html
https://rumble.com/embed/v45uxb0/?pub=4
VOTE FOR TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT
"If you took the ten worst Presidents in the history of the United States and added them up, they would not have done the destruction to our country as Crooked Joe Biden and the Biden Administration have done." - President Trump.
https://rumble.com/v48h1wt-vote-for-trump-for-president.html
https://rumble.com/embed/v45vqfz/?pub=4
>>20278347, >>20278787, >>20278988 WSJ Editor-in-Chief Admits To Davos Elites 'We No Longer Own The News'
>bitch please
hahahahah haha
Dan Scavino changed and updated truth social photos, Instant Classic
Instant Classic
https://truthsocial.com/@DanScavino
Wall Street Apes
@WallStreetApes
If you’re on X please go to this link and share this post, we need it to trend
As many people as possible need to see this  They’re Paying People $50,000 Per Post To Praise Joe Biden
Link: x.com/wallstreetapes/status/17
“Man Who Made Viral Videos Criticizing The Economy Ended Up On National Television
The Next Day He Got An Email Asking “What would your rate be to post positive videos about Joe Biden?”
They offered him $50,000 to post one video & his account only has 400k followers… We’ve been manipulated for years”
Jan 22, 2024, 1:38 AM
https://truthsocial.com/@WallStreetApes/posts/111798223716458988
Wall Street Apes
@WallStreetApes
Man Who Made Viral Videos Criticizing The Economy Ended Up On National Television
The Next Day He Got An Email Asking “What would your rate be to post positive videos about Joe Biden?”
They offered him $50,000 to post one video & his account only has 400k followers… We’ve been manipulated for years
“I just got a very interesting email. So for those of you who don't know, I am a critic of the current economy. And recently, I've been posting my thoughts on the economy, and, and, you know, obviously, it's not good. I'm not saying it's Trump's fault. I'm not saying it's Biden's fault.
I'm not saying it's anyone's fault. But obviously, Biden is president and the economy Sucks. So, you know, naturally the blame lies on him. And some of these videos of me being extremely critical of the government have gone so viral that I was literally featured at 7 PM on prime time on Fox News the other night. And this morning, I got an email from someone claiming to be from the Democratic party.
And they said, what would your rate be to post positive videos about Joe Biden? And I replied back, honestly, I know nothing about the economy. I don't pretend to know about the economy, and I know nothing about politics and I'd rather stay out of it. After all, I'm just a normal guy. I'm not a politician.
I'm not a conservative or a liberal talking point. I'm just a normal person. So they responded back, we understand you're not a fan of the Democrat party right now. How much would it cost? I was like, you know what?
I wonder how bad they want me to post this. It's $50 Grand. And they said yes. For those of you that don't know anything about social media, I have another account that's massive. And, like, For brand deals on my 3,000,000 follower account, I get like $5 Grand.
They offer me $50 Grand for a video on this account with only like 400,000 followers? I'm not gonna lie. I was very, very tempted, but I didn't do it.”
https://twitter.com/wallstreetapes/status/1749311073680031835
evaporated? water comms
notable
=notable==
Is this bullet hole going in, or coming out?
Is there an anon who knows about bullets in glass?
What kind of glass is this? Looks super thick and hasnt shattered, is it bullet proof or some other kind of glass?
thank you in advance
Why is the bullet hole shaped like sideways avocado?
thought a bullet hole would be round…
>>20281862
reported
there are more crazing splits on top and down below, not so much on the sides
dont know what to make of it
torqued or tempered?
>This is not too important
says who?
i will decided what is important or not
like your alleged contribution
filturd
you make no sense
Jordan Sather
@JordanSather
Alex Soros calling for a hit on Trump?
Bullet hole. $47.
Is this what they were planning behind closed doors at the WEF meetings?
Jan 21, 2024, 10:48 PM
https://truthsocial.com/@JordanSather/posts/111797553243273909
Jordan Sather
@JordanSather
·
6h
Replying to @JordanSather
Media Matters article headline tomorrow morning: “CoNsPiRaCy ThEoRiStS claim AlEx SoRoS is threatening to murder Trump!”
il Donaldo Trumpo
@ilpresidento
11 DOWN, 1 TO GO!!!
Jan 21, 2024, 9:59 PM
https://truthsocial.com/@ilpresidento/posts/111797363974214765
ooOoohnotable
does trump have an event or rally there soon?
tyb
shit!
Thesaurus results for EVAPORATED
merriam-webster.com
› thesaurus › evaporated
January 13, 2023 - Synonyms for EVAPORATED:dissolved, disappeared, vanished, melted,vaporized,invisible,evanesced, imperceptible;
gn.
notable
its called bullet47?
o7
notable
O127687
[Profile picture from source site (Twitter/Gettr/Truth Social)] Paul Sperry / @paulsperry_ 01/20/2024 17:17:58
ID: Twitter Web App
Twitter: 1748832263947911605
SWORN AFFIDAVITS REVEAL: Nikki Haley cheated on deployed husband with her communications consultant and a married lobbyist
#NaughtyNikki
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12970377/Nikki-Haley-cheated-affair-husband-affidavits-witnesses.html
EXCLUSIVE: Nikki Haley DID cheat on husband Michael - had affairs with her comms consultant and a MARRIED South Carolina lobbyist before she became governor, sworn affidavits and new witnesses claim
Nikki Haley, 51, denied claims she cheated on her husband Michael before she became South Carolina governor in 2010 saying she was '100% faithful'
Now, multiple GOP insiders tell DailyMail.com that they were intimately aware of Haley's infidelity at the time, saying: 'It was totally out in the open'
Communications consultant Will Folks, 49, and lobbyist Larry Marchant, 61, both signed affidavits in 2010 alleging they had a sexual relationship with Haley
Presidential candidate Nikki Haley falsely denied cheating on her husband when she was accused of engaging in two extramarital affairs during her gubernatorial campaign, multiple sources who worked with her claim.
New witnesses have come forward telling DailyMail.com that Haley's denials of two alleged 2008 affairs are false, and that the supposed trysts were brazen and widely known among South Carolina politicos.
Will Folks, 49, and Larry Marchant, 61, both signed affidavits in 2010 alleging they had a sexual relationship with the then-South Carolina lawmaker, before she went on to become governor.
While the contents of the affidavits were described by major news outlets at the time, this is the first time they have been published outside of Folks' own document which he published on his blog.
Haley, 51, denied both at the time, saying she was '100% faithful' to the father of her two children and husband of 28 years, Michael Haley – who was deployed in Afghanistan with the National Guard in 2012.
Haley now frequently cites him as a reason for her presidential candidacy.
But multiple GOP insiders told DailyMail.com that they were intimately aware of Haley's infidelity as a South Carolina lawmaker – including tales of steamy liaisons in the back of her Cadillac SUV, 'canoodling' in her lovers' laps at bars, and nights spent together in a Columbia, South Carolina duplex.
Haley has not responded to DailyMail's request for comment as of the time of publication.
Read before the last paragraphs for sordid details
The scandal failed to suppress her campaign. Haley served as governor until 2017, when she became ambassador to the United Nations under the Trump administration.
The GOP insider marveled at Haley's ability to shrug off the allegations, which would have killed many politicians' bids – regardless of their veracity.
'She's smart, an incredible operator, has a tremendous ability to put a force field around herself,' he said.
'She's got an incredible ability to parry and power through bad press. She has the Southern charm of Bill Clinton and the ruthlessness of Richard Nixon.'
Author Michael Wolff sparked unsubstantiated rumors of Haley having an affair with then-President Donald Trump in 2018, by writing in his book Fire and Fury that Trump 'had been spending a notable amount of private time with Haley on Air Force One and was seen to be grooming her for a national political future.'
Haley called the rumors 'disgusting' and 'absolutely not true', adding: 'I have literally been on Air Force One once and there were several people in the room when I was there,' in comments to news site Politico's Women Rule podcast at the time. Wolff offered no evidence for his claims.
In 2010 South Carolina political blogger Earl Capps also fanned flames about a rumored incident of 'drunken sex' with Haley – also unsubstantiated – when he conspicuously failed to deny them.
'I'm not going to admit or deny that one,' Capps told Folks' political site FITSNews in September 2010. 'I am not going to address those allegations at this time until I figure out what someone has gotten a hold of. That is my official position.'
No evidence emerged to back the rumors.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12970377/Nikki-Haley-cheated-affair-husband-affidavits-witnesses.html
Mormons, QAnon and a queer 'Mushroom Pope'
Urquhart, 58, like Close, had struggled with drug addiction throughout his adult life, hiding it from public view during his 16 years in the Utah state legislature.
He attempted suicide in 2015 and says he 'dragged his carcass across the finish line' of his political career, which ended the following year.
Ayahuasca was not the obvious answer to a man who joined the Mormon church aged 10, a notoriously authoritarian institution which shuns alcohol and caffeine.
But after abandoning his faith, Urquhart was drawn into the world of psychedelic therapy by family friends and first took the drug shortly after retiring from the Senate.
He never looked back.
In fact, Urquhart represents a surprisingly large number of disaffected Mormons who have gone from one 'goofy ass religion' to another, as he puts it.
Hummingbird hosts many of its events in Hildale, Utah, a town infamous as the former stronghold for the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, a polygamist offshoot of the Mormon church.
As such, it attracts many escaped women looking for help, some of whom attend psychedelic ceremonies in traditional prairie dress.
Erin Weist, 44, left the Mormon church - although not the unofficial polygamist sect - in 2021.
But, like many apostates, struggled with her uncertain place in the world after leaving a tight-knit community.
Her interest in plant-based medicines was sparked after meeting Urquhart's wife, Sarah, at a women in business conference.
She has since been on around a dozen magic mushroom trips, a remarkably rapid turnaround for someone whose closest thing to booze or drugs had previously been a glass or two of Coca Cola.
But she credits psilocybin - commonly known as magic mushrooms - with putting her at ease with the ambiguities of life.
The mother-of-five also says one the 'big attractions' of TDA is its lack of dogma, in stark comparison to the 'controlling' Mormon church.
'I think a lot of Mormons find that hugely appealing,' she says.
To cap off the medley of misfits mixing mushrooms with God, the Covid pandemic drew QAnon conspiracists to psychedelic gatherings in defiance of government lockdowns, Close says.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12975897/Praying-HIGH-er-power-Inside-boom-psychedelic-churches-former-Republican-senators-bankers-Mormons-organize-shroom-Ayahuasca-ceremonies-thousands-Americans-connect-God.html
it is permissible to notable again, ya fuckin hall monitor
January 19, 2024
Judicial Watch Sues Defense Department for Details of Alleged Conversation between CIA Employees Seeking to ‘Get Rid’ of then-President Trump
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Defense for reports submitted by a military officer to his superiors regarding an alleged conversation around January 2017 between CIA analysts Eric Ciaramella and Sean Misko about trying to “get rid” of then-President Trump (Judicial Watch Inc. v. U.S. Department of Defense (No. 1:24-cv-00068)).
Judicial Watch sued after the Defense Department failed to respond to a January 14, 2022, FOIA request for:
Any and all reports submitted by a US military officer assigned to the National Security Council to his superiors relating to a conversation he overheard circa January 2017 at an “all-hands” NSC staff meeting between CIA analysts Eric Ciaramella and Sean Misko regarding trying to “get rid” of then-President Trump, as discussed in a January 22, 2020 Real Clear Investigations article available at this link.
Any and all records relating to any investigations conducted by the Department of Defense and/or its sub-agencies and departments into the alleged conversation between Misko and Ciaramella referenced above, including but not limited to investigative reports and witness statements.
All emails and communications sent to and from members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff regarding the alleged conversation between Misko and Ciaramella and any related investigations.
The Real Clear Investigations article reported: By Paul Sperry, RealClearInvestigations
January 22, 2020
https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2020/01/22/whistleblower_was_overheard_in_17_discussing_with_ally_how_to_remove_trump_121701.html
Barely two weeks after Donald Trump took office, Eric Ciaramella – the CIA analyst whose name was recently linked in a tweet by the president and mentioned by lawmakers as the anonymous “whistleblower” who touched off Trump’s impeachment – was overheard in the White House discussing with another staffer how to remove the newly elected president from office, according to former colleagues.
Sources told RealClearInvestigations the staffer with whom Ciaramella was speaking was Sean Misko. Both were Obama administration holdovers working in the Trump White House on foreign policy and national security issues. And both expressed anger over Trump’s new “America First” foreign policy, a sea change from President Obama’s approach to international affairs.
At a meeting of National Security Council employees two weeks into the Trump administration, the unidentified military staffer, who was seated directly in front of Ciaramella and Misko, confirmed hearing them talk about toppling Trump.
“After Flynn briefed [the staff] about what ‘America First’ foreign policy means, Ciaramella turned to Misko and commented, ‘We need to take him out,’ ” the staffer recalled. “And Misko replied, ‘Yeah, we need to do everything we can to take out the president.’”
Added the military detailee, who spoke on condition of anonymity: “By ‘taking him out,’ they meant removing him from office by any means necessary. They were triggered by Trump’s and Flynn’s vision for the world. This was the first ‘all hands’ [staff meeting] where they got to see Trump’s national security team, and they were huffing and puffing throughout the briefing any time Flynn said something they didn’t like about ‘America First.’”
He said he also overheard Ciaramella telling Misko, referring to Trump, “We can’t let him enact this foreign policy.”
He said he also overheard Ciaramella telling Misko, referring to Trump, “We can’t let him enact this foreign policy.”
Alarmed by their conversation, the military staffer immediately reported what he heard to his superiors.
“It was so shocking that they were so blatant and outspoken about their opinion,” he recalled. “They weren’t shouting it, but they didn’t seem to feel the need to hide it.”
“The intelligence community targeted Trump for removal for daring to question Biden family corruption and election interference tied to Ukraine and Burisma,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said. “The Biden Defense Department’s sitting for over a year on a simple FOIA request on the Deep State targeting of Trump is a cover-up plain and simple.”
Judicial Watch previously sued for information about Ciaramella.
In November 2019 Judicial Watch reported that among those visiting Ciaramella at the White House were several officers in leftist George Soros organizations.
In December 2019 Judicial Watch sued the DOJ and CIA for communications between Ciaramella and former FBI agent Peter Strzok, former FBI Attorney Lisa Page, former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, and/or the Special Counsel’s Office. In both cases the government refused to produce records, “refusing to confirm or deny the existence or non-existence of responsive records” because “confirming or denying the existence or non-existence of responsive records would reveal information protected by the CIA Act, namely the existence or non-existence of an employment relationship between the Agency and Mr. Ciaramella.” And, would constitute an “unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.”
https://www.judicialwatch.org/judicial-watch-sues-defense-dept/
BLUEPRINT 
@BLUEPRINT_Q
CIA Officials Implicated in Secret Plot to ‘Get Rid’ of President Donald Trump
Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Defensefor reports submitted by a military officer to his superiors regarding an alleged conversation around January 2017 between CIA analysts Eric Ciaramella and Sean Misko about trying to “get rid” of then-President Trump
Jan 22, 2024, 12:10 AM
https://truthsocial.com/@BLUEPRINT_Q/posts/111797879059359926
CIA Officials Implicated in Secret Plot to ‘Get Rid’ of President Donald Trump
By thepoliticsbrief - January 21, 2024
In January 2017, an “all-hands” National Security Council staff meeting was convened for the explicit purpose of scheming to “get rid” of then-President Trump.
Donald Trump, the duly elected president, was already in the midst of a Russia collusion hoax accusing him of high treason, which was orchestrated by defeated Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Committee.
Trump’s political opponents weaponized the false accusation of Russian collusion using Russian disinformation in the Steele dossier. This had led to 2016 Trump campaign surveillance and the undermining of his first presidential term with the ensuing Mueller investigation. It was the consummate act of “election interference.”
This 2017 NSC meeting involved a figure that Americans would come to learn more about during the first impeachment imbroglio, based on hearsay that Donald Trump was attempting to procure “dirt” on future president Joe Biden from the Ukrainian president.
His name? The accused “whistleblower” Eric Ciaramella.
A 2020 Real Clear Investigations article sets the scene:
Barely two weeks after Donald Trump took office, Eric Ciaramella – the CIA analyst whose name was recently linked in a tweet by the president and mentioned by lawmakers as the anonymous “whistleblower” who touched off Trump’s impeachment – was overheard in the White House discussing with another staffer how to remove the newly elected president from office, according to former colleagues.
Sources told RealClearInvestigations the staffer with whom Ciaramella was speaking was Sean Misko. Both were Obama administration holdovers working in the Trump White House on foreign policy and national security issues. And both expressed anger over Trump’s new “America First” foreign policy, a sea change from President Obama’s approach to international affairs.
“Just days after he was sworn in they were already talking about trying to get rid of him,” said a former White House official who overheard their conversation.
“They weren’t just bent on subverting his agenda,” the former official added. “They were plotting to actually have him removed from office.”
It is important to note here that both Ciaramella and Misko were implicated in the plot to remove Donald Trump in the first impeachment hearing.
Misko left the White House last summer to join House impeachment manager Adam Schiff’s committee, where sources say he offered “guidance” to the whistleblower, who has been officially identified only as an intelligence officer in a complaint against Trump filed under whistleblower laws. Misko then helped run the impeachment inquiry based on that complaint as a top investigator for congressional Democrats. […]
The coordination between the official believed to be the whistleblower and a key Democratic staffer, details of which are disclosed here for the first time, undercuts the narrative that impeachment developed spontaneously out of what Trump’s Democratic antagonists call the “patriotism” of an “apolitical civil servant.”
Two former co-workers said they overheard Ciaramella and Misko, close friends and Democrats, discussing how to “take out,” or remove, the new president from office within days of Trump’s inauguration. These co-workers said the president’s controversial Ukraine phone call in July 2019 provided the pretext they and their Democratic allies had been looking for.
“They didn’t like his policies,” another former White House official said. “They had a political vendetta against him from Day One.”
Furthermore, the documentation that shows how Rep. Adam Schiff’s office was contacted by the “whistleblower” was reported as being “Secret.”
The investigators say that details about how the whistleblower consulted with Schiff’s staff and perhaps misled Atkinson about those interactions are contained in the transcript of a closed-door briefing Atkinson gave to the House Intelligence Committee last October. However, Schiff has sealed the transcript from public view. It is the only impeachment witness transcript out of 18 that he has not released.
Schiff has classified the document “Secret,” preventing Republicans who attended the Atkinson briefing from quoting from it. Even impeachment investigators cannot view it outside a highly secured room, known as a “SCIF,” in the basement of the Capitol. Members must first get permission from Schiff, and they are forbidden from bringing phones into the SCIF or from taking notes from the document.
But a new Judicial Watch lawsuit seeks to uncover the documentation of the NSC meeting
“Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Defense for reports submitted by a military officer to his superiors regarding an alleged conversation around January 2017 between CIA analysts Eric Ciaramella and Sean Misko about trying to “get rid” of then-President Trump (Judicial Watch Inc. v. U.S. Department of Defense (No. 1:24-cv-00068)),” the legal watchdog announced.
Judicial Watch “sued after the Defense Department failed to respond to a January 14, 2022, FOIA request for”:
Any and all reports submitted by a US military officer assigned to the National Security Council to his superiors relating to a conversation he overheard circa January 2017 at an “all-hands” NSC staff meeting between CIA analysts Eric Ciaramella and Sean Misko regarding trying to “get rid” of then-President Trump, as discussed in a January 22, 2020 Real Clear Investigations article available at this link.
Any and all records relating to any investigations conducted by the Department of Defense and/or its sub-agencies and departments into the alleged conversation between Misko and Ciaramella referenced above, including but not limited to investigative reports and witness statements.
All emails and communications sent to and from members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff regarding the alleged conversation between Misko and Ciaramella and any related investigations.
At a meeting of the NSC staffers two weeks into the Trump administration, an anonymous military staffer sat directly in front of Ciaramella and Misko and verified hearing them discuss deposing Trump.
“After Flynn briefed [the staff] about what ‘America First’ foreign policy means, Ciaramella turned to Misko and commented, ‘We need to take him out,’ ” the staffer recalled. “And Misko replied, ‘Yeah, we need to do everything we can to take out the president.’”
According to the military detailee, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, “By ‘taking him out,’ they meant removing him from office by any means necessary. They were triggered by Trump’s and Flynn’s vision for the world. This was the first ‘all hands’ [staff meeting] where they got to see Trump’s national security team, and they were huffing and puffing throughout the briefing any time Flynn said something they didn’t like about ‘America First.’”
He said he also overheard Ciaramella telling Misko, in reference to Trump, “We can’t let him enact this foreign policy.”
The military worker was alarmed by their chat and promptly reported what he had heard to his superiors.
“It was so shocking that they were so blatant and outspoken about their opinion,” he recalled. “They weren’t shouting it, but they didn’t seem to feel the need to hide it.”
“The intelligence community targeted Trump for removal for daring to question Biden family corruption and election interference tied to Ukraine and Burisma,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said. “The Biden Defense Department’s sitting for over a year on a simple FOIA request on the Deep State targeting of Trump is a cover-up plain and simple.”
“Judicial Watch previously sued for information about Ciaramella,” the report added. “In November 2019 Judicial Watch reported that among those visiting Ciaramella at the White House were several officers in leftist George Soros organizations.”
In December 2019, Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit against the DOJ and the CIA over contacts between Ciaramella and former FBI agent Peter Strzok, former FBI Attorney Lisa Page, former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, and/or the Special Counsel’s Office. In both instances, the government declined to provide records, “refusing to confirm or deny the existence or non-existence of responsive records” because “confirming or denying the existence or non-existence of responsive records would reveal information protected by the CIA Act, namely the existence or non-existence of an employment relationship between the Agency and Mr. Ciaramella.” And, would constitute an “unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.”
The NSC staff meeting, as described, would be evidence of high treason against a sitting President of the United States. It would be a true “insurrection” to topple the Commander-in-Chief, and would typically be prosecuted in a court of law, leading to arrest or court martial. The secret documents are thus critical to exposing a reported CIA and NSC plot to remove Donald Trump as President of the United States “by any means possible.”
https://thepoliticsbrief.com/cia-officials-implicated-in-secret-plot-to-get-rid-of-president-donald-trump/
>>20282182
Ron DeSantis is given the meme treatment as critics hilariously put the boot into his choice of footwear, battle with Disney and bizarre laugh after he ends his presidential campaign
Social media users were quick to generate memes after Florida governor Ron DeSantis halted his Republican presidential campaign
DeSantis, who endorsed his rival Donald Trump, became the subject of memes highlighting his awkwardness, eccentricity, and penchant for wearing boots
Some memes also focused on his fallout with Disney, after the company opposed banning classroom lessons on sexual orientation and gender identity
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12989789/Meatball-Ron-DeSantis-given-meme-treatment.html