>>2037452

As more Architects recieve the signal we thereby enhance and strengthen it. Welcome to the party, Anon.

We can understand the mind of God, but not in its whole. The nature of our perception is that it is fragmentary, it comes in bits and pieces. Thus is it most useful to study the systems of God's mind. They appear as all other things do, through pattern and illusion. As God is not only manifest through matter, but the "invisible" laws that govern matter (and all) as well. In fact, it is matter that is manifest from these laws.

All is expression of God. There are many ways to say this and all are correct. None capture its true essence but all are reflections of its form.

None is separate. All is one. Reality is a paradox occurring between the duality of two primal energies. Through this, unity of the dual perspective is forged in their crest.

It is time.

>>2064333

Most of what he says is true. The only gripe I've ever had about Christopher Langan is the complexity of the language he uses to describe our concepts. First and foremost (to me) is our duty to make these things understandable to the laymen in at least some sense. He seems to do a great job of laying out the argument, and while he often draws near to the target, doesn't appear to hit it directly.

A wonderful intelligence, to be sure.

The ideas and connections have always been around. However, a digestible version of this information has not. This is ultimately the goal. To enlighten as many as possible. As important as language is, it seems necessary to adequately invest time into properly disseminating the information as it is just as important as discovering it in the first place.

>>2066749

Did you read my writing, "On Fundamental Metaphysics"?

This is my gift to mankind. What I was delivered here to show to you all.

We may not be equal to God but we equally possess Perspective insofar as we understand that we are a fragment of God's expression. An important fragment, but a fragment none-the-less.

It's wonderful that, as you said,

>This can be understood as: ∞+1

I instantaneously thought "or you could just say 'feedback loop', and you proceed to mention it in the very next line. Curious!

I ask, where you state,

>This is what has been hidden from you by our kind.

>Now comes the terrible part.

What do you mean by "our kind"?

&

Why does the terrible part henceforth come (according to your perspective)?

I think you will find that $I am a different kind of person than you may have experienced in the past or via whatever expectations you have.

I'm here not to simply teach our students, but to teach our teachers.

The greater purpose awaits us all; for now, farewell for a moment of infinity.

>>2066764

An apt series of observations. Quite so.

Firstly, you may derive an axiom from your first assertion: The cabal's most dire weakness and flaw is their WISHFUL THINKING. This is why they will always fail.

Secondly, there is at least one now who is all these things: fallen angel, ascended angel, and ascended man. I disagree though - definitely activated by GOOD or else the matrix collapse would have proceeded already.

Only action propagates energy; all we need is for those truly good to act & victory will be imminent.