TYB
You act like you're trying to do me a favor while maliciously imitating me and giving the okay to VaticanClown and MuhGuhGaytriot. You're not "helping" me, you're deliberately trying to force me to behave the way you want, trying to control my behavior. You tried making an issue out of 40 posts last bread but VaticanClown going over 100 posts is okay with you. You're a sad, pathetic little Den of Absolute Retards clown, paid to cause strife, and is bitter that his favorite narrative that he's paid to post is not accepted, gets removed, so you have to find something else to attack using the same tactics and just focus on individuals.
See, I get it. The whole point was to rile me up, so you could now play all innocent and point to me and say, "Look, he's the irrational one all along. I'm just an innocent Anon approving of VaticanTard digs and MuhGuhGaytriot memes." Only Anons have long memories here, this place is monitored by MILINT and SIGINT, and there's kind of an archive of posts demonstrating your posting patterns. You're trying to impress new eyes, but how many new eyes do you think this place gets when there is only currently 29 UIDs?
No, but you yourself are providing plenty of examples of shill stupidity while trying to present yourself as something you're not.
See, Anons, when the mimicry fails, when the AI reasoning fails, he has to try and save face by saying he was helping. He's just a helper Anon that likes VaticanClown and MuhGuhGaytriot.
You did enough to pipe up, one post. If you didn't care you wouldn't be trying to convince anyone else that "No one cares."
Maybe if you repeat it enough you'll start to believe it.
They still can't stop talking about their target, just like they couldn't stop talking about Jews.
Funny how the ones making the accusations of narcissism talk moar about their target than who they accuse does. MuhJoo tactics, insinuation and allegation, just adapted to be used on a single Anon rather than an entire group. Not defending myself or ego, I'm engaging an evil and malicious little twit. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only.
One post from Q would get the ducks in a row right quick.
This you?
>Did I mention GOD BLESS THE JEWS yet today? It really makes smoking pepe the projection shill seethe when he has absolutely zero evidence sauce or screenshots to prove you're a muhjoo when he's projecting you're a muhjoo. When all else fails the glownigger in the cubicle next to him stops posting muhjoo spam so that he can project it on you and label you with it, because now all of a sudden it stops. Every day. Every single day he does the same projection. Many times a day without exception. Learn your echo chamber shills.
>so sorry for rambling, thanks for your ear
Careful using first person pronouns, Anon. If you don't use the 3rd person "As an anon" or "this anon" or follow the rules of Anonymous as defined on halfchan that they expect you to follow here as well they'll call you a narcissist. Just a bit of sarcasm. Glad to hear you're moar at peace than you once were.
In the past 8 months there's moar whining about a single individual person that posted a Pepe he became fond of than the ethnicity/religion in the regular spam that was posted for over half a decade. January 2022 was when I took the gloves off and decided to see if it was possible go toe to toe with the clowns' "ideas" in the sphere. Turns out it was possible, and easier than anticipated.
Trying to use the word genocide to describe Hamas' use of human shields is kind of dumb.
With "Free Palestine" written on its gun.
He's in court today, isn't it?
Tell Hamas to stop using human shields. Their war, their problem.
I don't support genocide just because I disagree with you. Hamas is using human shields. A Hamas base was found under a UN agency building in Gaza recently with power and computer networking cables running from the building through the tunnels to the base. Sounds to me like some globalist Deep State assets are being taken out. Trying to incite other to grab their torches and pitchforks over that here is kind of moot.