Anonymous ID: ec0e47 Feb. 12, 2024, 6:45 p.m. No.20404438   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4450

Do they count on the fact that people [human psyche] are more prone to believe something if heard over-and-over again by different โ€˜trustedโ€™ sources?

Do โ€˜echo chamberโ€™ tactics provide validation / credibility to the topic/point being discussed?

Threat to intellectual freedom?

Would control over[of] these institutions/organizations allow for the mass control of a populations viewpoint re: a desired topic?

Read again โ€“ digest.

Would control over[of] these institutions/organizations allow for the mass control of a populations viewpoint re: a desired topic?

Logical thinking.

Anonymous ID: ec0e47 Feb. 12, 2024, 6:55 p.m. No.20404477   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

When โ€˜non-dogmaticโ€™ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or stable [livestock kept โ€“ sheep].

When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable

Anonymous ID: ec0e47 Feb. 12, 2024, 7:01 p.m. No.20404497   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4514

"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.