Steve Bannon On The Left's Reliance On Lawfare: "It's About The Reign Of The Lawless".
White European people are the enemies of the Jews.Rural White Christians are the enemy
13:51
https://rumble.com/embed/v4emdbw/?pub=4
Mike Davis Perfectly Predicts '9-0' Supreme Court Victory For President Trump In ColoradoMajor Legal Victory for President Trump
7:10
https://rumble.com/embed/v4em28r/?pub=4
This is a very bad day for leftists and MSM, for some reason its a great day for Trump, anons, the voting public, and the Constitution
God Bless America! We Will Win! 2024
Gaetz Takes Early Lead in the 2026 Florida Republican Gubernatorial Primary: A Kaplan Strategies Poll Insight
Doug KaplanMarch 2, 2024
Gaetz Takes Early Lead in the 2026 Florida Republican Gubernatorial Primary: A Kaplan Strategies Poll Insights
Kaplan Strategies 2026 Florida Gubernatorial Primary Poll HighlightsPoll Results Click Here
Kaplan Strategies, a premier polling and strategic consulting firm, has released its latest findings on the 2026 Republican Gubernatorial Primary in Florida, offering early insights into the race. Our poll, conducted among 1,151 registered, likely Republican voters, reveals Congressman Matt Gaetz as the early frontrunner with 16% support, closely followed by Byron Donalds at 13%, and Ashley Moody at 10%. With a significant 51% of voters still undecided, the race remains wide open for emerging candidates.
Our analysis indicates a strong MAGA influence within the Florida Republican electorate, with 63% identifying as “MAGA Republicans.” This demographic could play a pivotal role, especially if former President Donald Trump, who enjoys a favorable view from 82% of the respondents, chooses to endorse a candidate. The impact of such an endorsement is deemed more influential than one from Governor Ron DeSantis, suggesting potential shifts in voter support pending high-profile endorsements.
The poll also explored voter preferences for Attorney General and Chief Financial Officer, finding a vast majority of voters are still undecided, highlighting opportunities for candidates to gain ground with effective campaigning and strategic endorsements.
Notably, Matt Gaetz leads in favorability among the potential gubernatorial candidates and has the broadest name recognition. Gaetz’s appeal spans across various demographics, securing the highest percentage of both male and female votes and winning all age groups except for voters aged 65+, where Byron Donalds has a slight edge.
This comprehensive poll was conducted using an innovative online panel of cell phone users, ensuring a diverse and accurate representation of likely Florida’s Republican voters. With a margin of error of ±2.9%, these results offer valuable insights for candidates, political strategists, and observers gearing up for a competitive primary race.
For more detailed insights and analysis, visit [Your Website].
About Kaplan Strategies
Kaplan Strategies stands at the forefront of political polling and strategic consulting, providing actionable intelligence and strategic guidance to political campaigns, businesses, and organizations. Our commitment to excellence and innovation enables our clients to navigate the complexities of the political landscape and achieve their goals.
This summary is designed to be informative and engaging, capturing the essence of your poll findings and the services offered by Kaplan Strategies. Gaetz Takes Early Lead in the 2026 Florida Republican Gubernatorial Primary: A Kaplan Strategies Poll Insight clicj
https://orlando-politics.com/2024/03/02/gaetz-takes-early-lead-in-the-2026-florida-republican-gubernatorial-primary-a-kaplan-strategies-poll-insight/
Ruling on Deters-Massie lawsuit expected March 15
Avatar photo
by Rebecca Hanchett
March 1, 2024.1/2
A Lewis circuit court judge is expected to rule March 15 on a motion tied to U.S. congressman Thomas Massie’s qualification for reelection amid a legal challenge from primary opponent Eric Deters.
Lewis and Greenup Circuit Judge Brian McCloud said in court Friday he plans to rule March 15 on Massie’s motion that the court find Massie “a bona fide candidate” for reelection to the 4th U.S. House District, Massie attorney Chris Wiest told LINK nky. Other motions are also pending.
Deters — a former Northern Kentucky attorney representing himself in the case — filed a lawsuit challenging Massie’s qualification for reelection back on Feb. 22.
Wiest told LINK he does not expect a March 15 ruling on another Massie motion asking that Deters be sanctioned in response to the lawsuit, although a ruling on that could come at a later date. That motion requests Deters be prohibited from filing any future pro se (meaning “for himself”) state court actions without having the actions first screened by a judge.
Deters, a 2023 Kentucky gubernatorial candidate who is running against Massie for Congress, says in the Feb. 22 suit that Massie is not qualified to run this year based largely on residency questions surrounding current state House District 66 candidate TJ Roberts – one of two witnesses to Massie’s Dec. 18 candidate filing in Frankfort.
Deters’ lawsuit claims that Roberts – whose home on East Bend Road in Burlington was destroyed by fire early last year, but has since been rebuilt – was not living at that address last year when he listed it as his permanent address as a witness to Massie’s filing on Dec. 18. State law requires election filings be witnessed by two persons, both living in the same district as a candidate and registered with the same political party as the candidate.
Deters claims Roberts’ residency in the district was uncertain when Roberts witnessed Massie’s filing on Dec. 18. His lawsuit asks the court to throw out Massie’s candidacy based largely on that claim.
Deters himself filed to run against Massie in this year’s congressional primary Jan.5.
Massie response, Roberts’ affidavit
Massie responded to Deters in a Feb. 26 motion, asking the court to rule in his favor based in part on a Feb. 26 affidavit from Roberts.
In the affidavit, Roberts gave sworn testimony that the East Bend Road address is his permanent address.
“Mr. Roberts testifies that he is a legal permanent resident,” the motion reads. “He has been a registered Republican in Kentucky’s Fourth Congressional District (and Kentucky House District 66) since 2017.”
According to the motion, Roberts stayed with his mother temporarily at her home in Walton after the fire through mid June 2023. From that point to Jan. 10, 2024, Roberts testified that he stayed temporarily at a residence on Torrid Street in Burlington (also in the 4th District and 66th House District) until moving to a rebuilt home at the permanent East Bend Road address on Jan. 11, 2024.
Allstate insurance company paid for temporary living arrangements on Torrid Street during reconstruction of Roberts’ home, the motion reads….
https://linknky.com/news/2024/03/01/massie-reelection-challenge-deters/
2/2
While living temporarily elsewhere in the district, the motion clarifies however that Roberts returned to the East Bend Road address “every single day in November, December, 2023 and January, 2024 to check mail, to feed the animals (on the property), to check on construction progress, and to ensure that heat was provided to the residence during cold weather.”
The motion goes on to say Roberts was advised by the Kentucky Secretary of State’s office to list his permanent legal address “and not any temporary address” on both his witness signature for Massie and on Roberts’ own candidate filing dated Jan. 5.
“Roberts followed the Office of the Secretary of State’s advice in completing both forms,” the motion reads. “Thus Roberts’ legal residence throughout 2023 and 2024 was (East Bend Road) Burlington.”
Motion for sanctions on hold
A ruling from Judge McCloud on Massie’s motion to prohibit Deters from filing future pro se court action without judicial screening is not expected March 15, said Wiest. He said a ruling on that motion could come at a later date.
On Feb. 26, Massie filed the motion, saying Deters’ Feb. 22 lawsuit meets legal standards for sanctions under existing case law and civil law. Among the case law cited is Large v. Oberson(Ky. 2017) which determined that “sanctions are appropriate when litigants pursue baseless claims,” the motion reads.
According to the motion, Deters has “a history of filing frivolous and self-serving actions” and “his prior history of vexatiously challenging another opponents’ residence.” It goes on to say that the lawsuit was filed for “improper purposes, namely to harass, cause needless delay, generate free press coverage, and increase the costs of litigation.”
Also cited in the motion is Deters’ 2023 lawsuit challenging the residency of last year’s gubernatorial rival Kelly Craft. It says the challenge was made “not to adjudicate an issue but instead to garner press coverage.” That case was dismissed by Fayette Circuit Court Judge Lucy A. VanMeter last May.
On Friday Deters filed a motion to strike Massie’s move for sanctions. He provided a statement to LINK Friday evening, published in part below:
“My only comment is that I will be filing my response to their motion and I believe Thomas Massie out of 435 Congressional Members is going to regret being more careful choosing is (sic) witness to his nominating position. He messed it up.”
https://linknky.com/news/2024/03/01/massie-reelection-challenge-deters/
I’ll be so glad not to see her name, her face, hear her voice, or witness how much she hates men
The Return of the Clintons
Mar 4, 2024
Late last June, when Bill Clinton welcomed Larry Hogan to Little Rock, the ex-president realized he had an opportunity to step carefully back into the political fray. The pair was scheduled for a ticketed chat about bipartisanship on Clinton’s home turf just as Hogan, the former Maryland governor, was rumored to be thinking about a third-party presidential run via the No Labels group, which he was also co-chairing. Before they walked onstage, Clinton delicately made his view clear to the Republican, even though Hogan hadn’t asked: Any independent campaign of the kind No Labels was talking about could only benefit Donald Trump.
He wasn’t done yet. Two months later, Clinton heard from Joe Manchin, who was vacationing near the Clintons’ spot in East Hampton and wanted advice about his political future. Clinton had heard real concern from fellow Democrats that the West Virginian would head a No Labels ticket himself, and he’d previously discussed the politically tricky senator with the Biden White House when administration officials asked for his help winning Manchin over on legislation. Manchin was being far more open about the attractiveness of an independent run than Hogan was. So when they met in person, Clinton decided to get considerably more forceful than their placid surroundings might have suggested. This time, he ditched the diplomatic niceties and told the senator sharply that he was risking putting Trump back in the White House.
By late November, Bill found himself closer to the center of presidential politics than he’d been since Hillary ran in 2016. He and Joe Biden hadn’t talked in person in a few months, but he had been making no secret to friends that he thought Biden wasn’t getting the credit he deserved for his accomplishments. Tucked into a quiet corner of Air Force One on the way to Georgia for Rosalynn Carter’s memorial service, the 42nd president repeated the sentiment to the 46th, chewing over the unique challenges of the presidency as almost no one else could. Flying south from Washington, they discussed Biden’s obstacles in a political environment warped by Trump — how hard it had gotten to focus public attention on what Biden was doing and how complicated it had become to turn around the national feeling about the economy.
Hillary wasn’t part of that conversation, but she was on the plane, too — along with Michelle Obama and Jill Biden — and she had plenty of her own thoughts as Biden entered 2024 running behind her old foe in the polls. In recent months, the former secretary of state has begun convening groups of friends and political allies for private dinners to talk through the coming election season and to drum up badly needed support for Democratic candidates, starting with the president. The sessions are occasionally at the Clintons’ primary home in Chappaqua, but more often at their house in Washington, not far from the residence of Vice-President Kamala Harris, with whom she has quietly been keeping in touch.
Four years ago, the Clintons were as far from political influence as they’d been in ages. In a post–Me Too world, Bill was often treated aspersona non grata in public and Hillary was still thought of primarily as the person who lost to Trump. But a few weeks ago, they drew a flurry of media attention with the announcement that Biden would host a major fundraiser in the city with Bill and Barack Obama in late March. (As the inescapable flood of Trump fundraising emails put it: “Obama is back! Bill Clinton is back too.”) The event is just the most public part of what’s been a longer-running behind-the-scenes effort. Neither Clinton considers politics their primary work these days — they’re staying busy with travel, writing projects, and foundation work — but according to a dozen people who’ve spoken with them directly in recent weeks, both have been quietly and steadily increasing their engagement with Washington as the election season heats up.
It’s been eight years since a Clinton was on a ballot, the longest period since Bill’s first failed congressional campaign in 1974, and the 2020 race was arguably the first one in decades in which neither of them was particularly powerful. Now they, and the Democratic Party, are trying to work out what, exactly, their most useful role could now be. No longer a distinct power center or the same draw for donors or audiences as the Obamas, they are nonetheless far from retirees. Instead, they are a unique but amorphous source of advice and influence given their extensive experience and large networks….
(Pulling out all the dead guns, pathetic)
https://12ft.io/proxy
Settlement in Wisconsin fake elector case offers new details on the strategy by Trump lawyers
SOPHIA TAREEN
Updated Mon, March 4, 2024
Two attorneys for then-President Donald Trumporchestrated a plan for fake electors to file paperwork falsely saying the Republican won Wisconsin in a strategy to overturn Joe Biden’s 2020 victory there and in other swing states, according to a lawsuit settlement reached Monday that makes public months of texts and emails.
Under their agreements, Kenneth Chesebro and Jim Troupis turned over more than 1,400 pages of documents, emails and text messages, along with photos and video, offering a detailed account of the scheme’s origins in Wisconsin. The communications show how they, with coordination from Trump campaign officials, replicated the strategy in six other states including Georgia, where Chesebro has already pleaded guilty to charges stemming from the 2020 election.
The agreements settle a civil lawsuit brought by Democrats in 2022 against the two attorneys and 10 Republicans in Wisconsin who posed as fake electors. The Republicans settled in December.
“Our democracy demands better than this,” said Scott Thompson, one of the plaintiffs' attorneys who helped negotiate the agreements. “That is why this lawsuit … consistently sought transparency, accountability and deterrence. We can’t let this happen again.”
There is no admission of wrongdoing or liability in the agreements in which Chesebro and Troupis promise to never participate in similar efforts involving future presidential campaigns. Troupis must also pay an undisclosed amount to the plaintiffs.
Troupis said Monday in an emailed statement that the “alternate elector ballots" were “a reasonable course of action” given that the 2020 results were appealable to the U.S. Supreme Court.
“The settlement was made to avoid endless litigation, and nothing in today’s settlement constitutes an admission of fault, nor should it,” he added.
Phone and text messages left Monday for Chesebro weren’t immediately returned.
Electors are people appointed to represent voters in presidential elections. The winner of the popular vote in each state determines which party’s electors are sent to the Electoral College, which meets in December after the election to certify the outcome.
The documents show how Chesebro and Troupis, Trump’s attorney in Wisconsin, used arcane laws in rationalizing and drafting the false certificates for the fake electors. They also reveal how the two strategized ways to delay deadlines for certifying electoral votes and sway public opinion, including floating ideas on conservative talk radio.
In November 2020, as they were awaiting a decision from the then-conservative leaning Wisconsin Supreme Court on Trump’s effort to invalidate thousands of votes in the state, Chesebro suggested to Troupis that they contact conservative radio hosts in Milwaukee and Madison: “Mostly to maximize the chance that SCOW (Supreme Court of Wisconsin) justices hear about this quickly and prejudge the case?”
He ended with a winking emoji.
The fake elector efforts are central to an August federal indictment filed against Trump alleging he tried to overturn results of the 2020 election. Federal prosecutors, investigating his conduct related to the Jan. 6, 2021, U.S. Capitol riot, have also said the scheme originated in Wisconsin. Trump also faces charges in Georgia and has denied wrongdoing….
https://www.yahoo.com/news/settlement-wisconsin-fake-elector-case-162518500.html
Bill Clinton Helped Shut Down Third Party Bids as Part of More Active Role in 2024
Zachary LeemanMar 4th, 2024,
Bill Clinton helped convince two candidates to drop their fantasies of third-party presidential runs, which is part of the former president and his wife, Hillary Clinton, taking a more active and expansive role in the 2024 political field, according to a new report.
New York Magazine’s Gabriel Debenedettireported on Monday that the Clintons have been keeping a close eye on the 2024 presidential election, and this included Bill Clinton convincing both former Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan (R) and Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.V.) that third-party runs would only benefit Donald Trump and hurt President Joe Biden.
From NY Mag:
Late last June, when Bill Clinton welcomed Larry Hogan to Little Rock, the ex-president realized he had an opportunity to step carefully back into the political fray. The pair was scheduled for a ticketed chat about bipartisanship on Clinton’s home turf just as Hogan, the former Maryland governor, was rumored to be thinking about a third-party presidential run via the No Labels group, which he was also co-chairing. Before they walked onstage, Clinton delicately made his view clear to the Republican, even though Hogan hadn’t asked: Any independent campaign of the kind No Labels was talking about could only benefit Donald Trump.
According to the report, Clinton was more forceful in his approach with Manchin, who, up until recently, was consistently teasing a potential run, likely on the No Labels ticket. Clinton told Manchin flat-out that a presidential bid by him would land Trump back in the White House.
Hillary Clinton has also been taking a more active role in helping Democrats, which includes regular talks with Vice President Kamala Harris.
Associates of the Clintons claimed the pair arelooking at precinct-level data and getting heavily involved.(cheating)
“They’re junkies!” one associate of Hillary Clinton and Biden said. “They’re looking at polls; they’re all in.”
(Really strange the Clintons popping up, is Obama trying to turn over the presidency to these two?)
https://www.mediaite.com/politics/bill-clinton-helped-shut-down-third-party-bids-as-part-of-more-active-role-in-2024/