whoever wrote this sounds rascist.
Must be a scribe for Hillary Clinton.
Their heads are exploding.
kekekkkkkkekkk
Nevermind Q reseach had all this ~7 years ago.
Now the shills can openly project their insanity.
Doesn't even make sense
Fair elections fail to exist when you have massive Propaganda, controlled info and fake voting machine
We presently live in a dictatorship.
Ironic they claim that's what DJT will bring;
Figures.
what he or she wrote is exactly the picture they've been painting the whole time.
They neglect to elucidate the engine which makes q research run; its heartbeat - the uncovering of State-sponsored crime, going back decades.
Nothing new.
DJT needed to keep a low profile all along, in order for the revelations to work on the public, and for him to be enabled to turn-back the long-planned total destruction of our Republic.
The Trump-haters either feign ignorances or just are truly un-learned and stupid.
What I really believe is the corruption is very obvious and simple to understand.
The only ones who (pretend to?) fail to "get it" - are interested parties - who lead the Media and alleged "intelligencia" cadre.
If you spent a lot of years serving the beast, living in its belly, reciting its doxology; you reflexively fall into massive denial when confronted.
It had to be done slowly.
Have no idea how that article appeared on the Gateway Pundit site.
The brothers who run that, said to be FB1, must be under massive pressure?
Same shill spiel, which leaves out the most important element to the levening of the bread of the Trump revolution; CORRUPTION, which people are sick to their stomach over.
All the Trump haters deny that. They deny the truth of what has been going on; and why DJT is necessary.
Such haters /shill never got the spirit of what America is/was about; and why its worth fighting for.
Bannon characterized the left today as gossiper, wine tasting clubs, coffee clatches - basically people who don't read and who are too arrogant or, sold -out - or both to have a responsible opinion.
What surprises me though is the hate with which they super-charge their speech.
So strange; would never have predicted it.
Supercillious.
As Bannon says, they believe there is no doubt, in their own minds, they are superior to us and above us.
Weird.
To give the benefit of the doubt; they work so hard, have no time to "think outside the box" or outside what their leaders, and the make-believe "crowd," drill into them and pressure them to believe?
It 's either that or just plain evil; something which is known to exist and know to defy explanation and logic?
his right here is a double
>>20519008 pb
>>20520843 pb
could this "Will" be a double.
that's why the crappy suit and the Phorisis/Exema on the wrist?
yes, does look similar to rope burns, but could just be Exema?
>>20520868 pb
do you have an example?
like a side-by-side?
thanks.
the one on the left, to me, does not resemble the other pics of Eliz. I've seen.
I wonder.
I have old books with pics of royals.
I see see where the little girl does resemble the late Queen.
But the one on the right doesn't look like Liz to me.
keke
I'll work on it. found the books yesteday, archival old-ish picture books.
>the one on the left, to me, does not resemble the other pics of Eliz
should have wrote
the one on the RIGHT - pic on the right of the older young lady - seems to miss matching the image of Queen Eliz. as a youth I' ve seen.
But I may have missed a lot.
I'll look farther.
I see what you're saying.
The young princess resembles the alleged grandmother; in some photos.
Grandma seems much different in her younger pics.
One pic, tagged as "coronation" makes her much too old?
Wasn't she invested as Queen as a youth?
And in the pic, Anne looks very unlike Anne; yet more like Liz?
Eliz in Garden looks like grandaugher.
OG Queen Eliz as in the panel of doubles, resembles grand-daughter.
doubt
multinational totalitarian communist fascism = dictatorship
.
same difference.
dictatorship / monarchy can be by a clique.
the requirement is:
zero imput by "the people"
cf. Thomas Hobbes
4th from the left has the "Jack the Ripper" look
no problem
it could be both.
Hobbes didn't say it was royalty. In the passage I read it refered to oligarghy unresonsive to the imput of "the people"
Will have to read moar.
I belive in those days Monarachy was implied to be resonsive to the Parliment - word of the people's reps.
>I belive in those days Monarachy AS ROYALTY was implied to be resonsive to the Parliment - word of the people's reps.
And Monarchy, as dictatorship, he defined as any rularship where imput of "the people" was unaccepted.
TX according to my old fam from Alab. / Virginia & then TX is where all the the crooks ended up
Crooks are tough.
?
They didn't pick Dallas for killing JFK, for nothing.
also Memphis for MLK
or L.A. for RFK
never said it was a bout money.
why mis-characterize my argument?
you act like a marxist.
boredom is, as boredom does - if you are even sincere, which I doubt.
Doubt you 've been here long.
where re your memes?
oh I forgot, shill and trolls have no memes.
yes, but they would be deployed under cover of quelling civil unrest; which is somewhat untrue of NYC right now.
The violence is more criminal than political; or not?
Personally I feel there's an element in NYC that is hard-line communist/NWO allied, and who openly want to overthrow the Constitution and USA.
The invasion of "barbarians" is just a symptom.
The enemy turned on the spigot for that.
What other cities are the Nat. Guard supposed to show up in, beside NYC?