>>20552341 pb
>If they want to "save daylight" they should change the time stuff opens and closes with the seasons instead of messing with the clocks like retards.
^^^^^^^^^^THIS^^^^^^^^^
>ALL freemasons hide behind an oath, in secrecy, in darkness
all ANONS hide behind an oath, in secrecy, in darkness
see how fucking STOOPIT IT SOUNDS?
you need to see a dr about that autocraniorectal syndrome you got going on there
notabru
>>20554585
>Michael Flynn launches website for bodily donations from unvaccinated individuals
OR….
is it a psyop to get the unjabbed to identify themselves, and then track them down and forcibly jab them?
>That's why there is no such thing as anon as a group.
what kind of actual fucktard are you?
just because anons don't carry a membership card
does NOT mean they are not a group
do you even grasp the distinction between REALITY and LABELS we make up for reality?
>how many times have you had previous breads locked early just so you can start a new one?
what actual fucking difference does it make, capt analretentive?
can you show us on the doll where the bots have touched you?
>i object to suggestions of suicide even when it's a joke.
i object to pompous self-appointed hall monitors who object to other people's free speech
"you complain about the mote in your brother's eye, but do not see the timber in your own."
>Anon is giving 3:1 odds the current drama is tranime arguing over the bake with one of its alts, and bread will be ghosted at the end to prove tranime’s reliability.
>It costs a lot of money to maintain an army of shills and bots.
anons are forcing them to squander that money
shitposting is an essential activity
>He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous.
then what fucking good is He?
>A better question is what good are you?
clumsy sidestep while avoiding an answer to my question
whattsamatta?
don't have a good answer?
mumbo jumbo gobbledy gook
baseless circular reasoning
what if human parents abandoned a newborn to fend for itself?
would you make excuses for their negligence?
>You haven't read it.
know you know what other people have or haven't read?
seems like YOU are the one with delusions of Godhood
maybe you're santa?
tyb
>Those of us who have read it cover to cover tend to have a different view on things.
pointing your eyes at words on a page does NOT automatically grant you understanding, knowledge, insight, or wisdom
only a pompous condescending hypocrite would imply otherwise
thank you for clarifying your status