dChan
Anonymous ID: 000000 March 20, 2024, 4:19 p.m. No.20598470   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8531

This unconstitutional Trump fine (Excessive fines Art8, Sec3) has been bugging anon.

It appears obvious that SCOTUS would overturn this fine amount, but these corrupt individuals, in my opinion, are being forced to do this.

So hypothetically, if they do seize trump properties, "fire sale" them, and they are gone…wouldn't Trump not only be entitled to recuperation of the "face value" of the fine at $454+ million and punitive damages against the attorney, the judge and the federal government?

If that is the case, a Trump civil suit against these people and entities would seem to have a valuation of potentially billions of dollars.

Any lawfags out there to chime in, or correct my assumption?

Anonymous ID: 000000 March 20, 2024, 4:39 p.m. No.20598553   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>20598531

Certainly agree it violates the excess fines clause.

Read a blip about a bondman stating he has never heard of such an outrageous fine.

This seems not only fraudlent, but a vindictive prosecution that would warrant, at minium, review by bar association, judicial misconduct board, and potentially a civil lawsuit as Trump the Plaintiff.

Do you concur?

Anonymous ID: 000000 March 20, 2024, 4:56 p.m. No.20598610   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>20598584

>military comes out of the shadows

Biden posturing for war?

>https://www.wsj.com/world/asia/taiwan-acknowledges-presence-of-u-s-troops-on-outlying-islands-c81c3b6b

Elections become postponed

Anonymous ID: 000000 March 20, 2024, 5:05 p.m. No.20598638   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>20598626

Flip flopping Tater

>https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/06/15/fact-sheet-president-biden-to-sign-historic-executive-order-advancing-lgbtqi-equality-during-pride-month/