dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

Jesse Watters ran a devastating segment last night on radical Judge Juan Merchan who silenced President Donald Trump from talking about his family’s financial ties to the current junk case he is presiding over against Donald Trump in New York City.

Judge Merchan should be impeached for this lawlessness. This is peak corruption and cannot stand.

Jesse Watters: Judge Juan Merchan, who is presiding over Trump’s so-called hush money case in New York, slapped an even bigger gag order on the former President last night. Trump is banned from talking about the judge’s family.

Why? Because the judge’s family was paid by the Biden campaign. The judge’s family is currently being paid by Adam Schiff over $10 million. Adam Schiff, this is the guy who conspired with Michael Cohen, the star witness in this case.

Trump isn’t allowed to say that the judge’s daughter is a Democrat consultant whose clients, the Biden campaign, Adam Schiff, are fundraising off Trump’s indictment. The judge’s family is getting rich off Trump trials, and he’s presiding over one.

If Trump’s convicted, his family financially benefits. Instead of recusing because of a glaring conflict of interest, the judge is gagging Trump for pointing out the conflict of interest. Even Michael Avenadi says it’s nuts. The lawyer tweeting this from prison.

We can’t be hypocrites when it comes to the First Amendment. It’s outrageous that Cohen and Daniels can do countless TV interviews, post on social, and make money on bogus documentaries all by talking-ish about Trump. But he’s gagged and threatened with jail if he responds.

The judge is threatening to put Trump in jail for pointing out that his liberal family is getting rich off this trial, and richer if he’s convicted. Now, the media who doesn’t support the First Amendment or care about corruption covers it this way.

The judge overseeing Donald Trump’s Hush Money trial just expanded a gag order forbid the defendant and former President from attacking his own family. He doesn’t just take his right to due process. He smears the judge. He harasses the judge’s daughter.

The judge’s daughter isn’t seven. She’s 34. He’s not attacking her. He’s just saying what she does for a living. How’s that an attack? He just wants a new judge, one whose family isn’t funded by Democrats. Ned Ryan is the founder of American Majority. Is that too much to ask?

It’s really not, Jesse. It’s pretty appalling. This feels like a turning point in all of this welfare against Trump. With this case, the left is dropping any pretense, doesn’t seem to care at all about having any pretense of legitimacy with the greater public It’s the gloves are off. It’s bare knuckles now.

A leftist judge with a case that was not taken up by previous, the Southern district in New York, Bragg’s predecessor, a case that should never have been brought. He’s presiding over it. Trump simply points out the conflict of interest with his daughter, who, by the way, it’s $93 million in solicitations raised on this specific case.

All Trump did was point out these facts. Instead of recusing himself, the judge goes, You need to shut up, and The corporate propagandists, with their Circus seal act, obediently rise to the occasion and say, Trump’s attacking the daughter.

No, he’s just pointing out facts. I mean, Jesse, this is a gross… The attack on Trump’s constitutional rights to defend himself, the abuse of the law, the legal system on Trump. I have to tell you, the Democrats, the left have made a massive bet on all of this law fare that some of it will take Trump out.

I’m making a bet that this lawfare is going to blow up in their face. When things like this really break in on the normies that are watching this, they’re going to realize the gross abuse of power that the left is actually doing to try and bring down Trump because Orange Man bad. Anything anywhere, anytime is acceptable because Orange Man bad.

Sounds like peak corruption.

Why is it the ones who bring the court cases against Trump are always the most deceitful and corrupt?

Trump’s been banned from talking about the judge’s family in the so-called hush money case in New York. Why? Because the judge’s family was paid by the Biden campaign and is currently being paid by Adam Schiff. Trump isn’t allowed to say the judge’s daughter is a Democrat… pic.twitter.com/q6oVsNBhj2

— Jesse Watters (@JesseBWatters) April 3, 2024

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/04/peak-corruption-jesse-watters-reveals-multi-million-dollar/

Judge Merchan’s Family is making MILLIONS, for Taking Trump to Court in Bogus Hush Money Case

4:15

https://twitter.com/JesseBWatters/status/1775322558125973613

Jack Smith Issues Veiled Threat to Judge Cannon Over Her Jury Instructions in Trump Classified Docs Case

Special Counsel Jack Smith issued a veiled threat to Judge Aileen Cannon in response to her jury instructions.

Last month Judge Aileen Cannon issued a jury instruction order in Jack Smith’s classified documents case and the leftist legal analysts went apocalyptic.

Cannon gave two options for jury instructions.

The first option:

In a prosecution of a former president for allegedly retaining documents in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 793(e), a jury is permitted to examine a record retained by a former president in his/her personal possession at the end of his/her presidency and make a factual finding as to whether the government has proven beyond a reasonable doubt that it is personal or presidential using the definitions set forth in the Presidential Records Act (PRA).

The second option is:

A president has sole authority under the PRA to categorize records as personal or presidential during his/her presidency. Neither a court nor a jury is permitted to make or review such a categorization decision. Although there is no formal means in the PRA by which a president is to make that categorization, an outgoing president’s decision to exclude what he/she considers to be personal records from presidential records transmitted to the National Archives and Records Administration constitutes a president’s categorization of those records as personal under the PRA.

“Cannon seems inclined to push the case to trial but is basically asking if she can stack the deck so Trump wins,” CNN legal analyst Norm Eisen said.

MSNBC’s legal reporter Jordan Rubin responded with “Judge Aileen Cannon is at it again.”

Jordan Rubin said Cannon is “apparently contemplating instructions that could effectively win Trump’s case for him…”

A J6 defense attorney told investigative reporter Julie Kelly that if Cannon gives these jury instructions, Jack Smith is “f*cked.”

Jack Smith responded to Cannon’s jury instruction order with a veiled threat: Do things his way or he’s going to seek “mandamus” at the appellate court so they can tell her what to do with the jury instructions!

Reading Jack Smith's response on jury instructions and it's clear that the gloves are off btw DOJ and Judge Cannon.

One defense attorney just told me: "The tone Smith is taking with Cannon is no longer persuasion but outright threats. Unheard of dynamic btw DOJ and the bench."

— Julie Kelly (@julie_kelly2) April 3, 2024

Jack Smith is completely hysterical because he has virtually no control over Judge Cannon’s final jury instructions.

Jack Smith's response is hysterical (and not in a funny way in a desperate way) bc he knows he has little control over her decision related to final jury instructions.

And he is arguing the basis for Trump's "unauthorized possession" of national defense material rests on Obama… pic.twitter.com/uVr0qxy8ex

— Julie Kelly (@julie_kelly2) April 3, 2024

Now Jack Smith is threatening to take the jury instruction fight to the appellate court.

Via Julie Kelly: Smith demanded that Cannon rule now on jury instructions (she doesn’t have to) or dismiss the counts so he can appeal. If she doesn’t, he might seek “mandamus” at appellate court–asking 11th Circuit to tell Cannon what to do in the case.

This is why Smith is so angry–he knows if Cannon proceeds with the proposed scenario presented in her jury instructions order, he is, as one defense attorney told me at the time, f*cked.

He essentially demands that she rule now on jury instructions (she doesn't have to) or… pic.twitter.com/765SfIDygK

— Julie Kelly (@julie_kelly2) April 3, 2024

Jack Smith last year charged Trump with 31 counts under the Espionage Act related to presidential records lawfully stored at Mar-a-Lago.

Trump’s attorneys recently filed a flurry of motions to dismiss Jack Smith’s classified docs case.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/04/breaking-jack-smith-issues-veiled-threat-judge-cannon/

Bidesthetics: Washington, D.C. residents note that Trump created beauty, Biden mandated eyesores on their city

By Monica Showalter

For swamp dwellers who don't have mansions in the Virginia suburbs the way Lois Lerner did, it's tough being a resident of Washington, D.C.

Which is why this article, by Politico journalist Michael Schaffer on why the locals hate the U.S. National Parks Service is so interesting.

He begins with this problem and then takes a deep dive into why it's a problem and the efforts to fix it:

If you live in Washington, the National Park Service is a weirdly big part of your life. The federal agency controls up to 90 percent of the city’s open space, a sprawling collection that ranges from the National Mall to hundreds of random traffic circles, grassy triangles and neighborhood gathering places, at least 356 in all.

Invariably, this accident of history leads to conflicts: Locals want a playground or a dog run or a lure for nearby businesses or, in one especially enervating case, a place for an LGBTQ+ bocce ball league to convene on Thursday nights. Park Service officials, following a rulebook more suited to Yellowstone than to a modest city park, nix it in the name of preservation or heritage or nitpicky regulations about organized sports.

It makes for an absolutely rotten way to run either a big city or a high-profile government agency —

Which sounds pretty wretched, having a big central authority to always tell you 'no' when all you want is a dog park, because its template of rules isn't designed for city living. Locals have indeed tried to fix that, to no avail.

One such issue described is the case of the Chesapeake and Ohio canal in Georgetown, which is a total eyesore and scary at night. Nobody can make it commercially viable or liveable or pretty to look at because the Park Service says it needs it to stay in its bleak way for historic preservation.

Schaffer has a good photo in his piece, showing how godawful that place looks. Yes, it does have a 19th century vibe but why would anyone want to preserve that instead of making it a lively commercial district that would improve the liveability of the city? Only a bureaucrat could cheer at leaving it the way it is because regulations.

The city itself has many historic places but it's strange to treat it like an untouchable museum. The rules make no sense. It would even be possible to keep the character of the place largely the same yet still allow at least farmer's market tents or something.

Now let's cut to the chase: Some political leaders understand this. And some do not.

Several proponents of a reimagined canal noted to me that they’d gotten their warmest reception from the Park Service during the years when Donald Trump was in the White House, but things went south after about 2021, when Joe Biden took office.

It was,

>>20676165

It was, by all accounts, a function of the career bureaucrats who happened to move in and out of key roles overseeing the canal, not a directive from the politicals in either administration. But if you are atop an administration, wouldn’t it be more attractive to get rid of the system under which you could even plausibly get blamed by either side in what ought to be the ultimate local-yokel debate?

Schaffer is a good reporter, but his conclusion doesn't match up with what he just described.

The residents got the door opened to them and their concerns heard during the Trump administration.

They got the door slammed in their faces during the Biden years and were effectively told too bad if they don't like it, hain't we got the power? It's just like things are done in lands with socialist commissars such as Venezuela and Cuba.

The change in attitudes is very striking, and obviously a function of the leadership at the top.

Biden doesn't care if residents have to live on an ugly eyesore canal and too bad if they pay rent, real estate costs, and taxes as if they were millionaires, which some are.

Trump, though, listens, and not only listens, but has his minions at the Park Service take an interest in aesthetics and liveability for those who live under their particular rule.

On the one hand, that's not surprising, given that Trump was and is a real estate magnate who understands well how location, location, location affect real estate and quality of life.

What better way to make the value of real estate go up than to make it attractive and liveable, the kind of place people would like to live in? It's natural.

But that is to scratch the surface.

Deep down, Trump has a certain capacity for leadership – not unlike that of Roman emperors Trajan or Hadrian actually, both of whom were known for all the beautiful monuments and landmarks that they left behind in Rome, many of which are still there.

Trump understands in an elemental way why external appearances are important for conveying the majesty and beauty and grandness because of their capacity to inspire. He has always had this leaderly "Roman emperor" sense of place and space, and obviously, it extended into his presidency.

It's well known that he commands visual landmarks specifically to inspire.

During his presidency, he commanded all federal buildings to follow the beautiful federalist style of architecture, as if building a "brand" of greatness. Leftists scoffed, but he was right. Ugly buildings don't inspire. They provoke graffiti and contempt. Beautiful buildings remind people of who they are. Trump wanted beautiful buildings.

Joe Biden got rid of that, and he has no interest in aesthetics or appearances. He's a vulgar man who not only restores the world of ugly things for people even in places like Georgetown, all in the name of government power. Worse still, he also fails to listen, with the Parks Service under his leadership a nasty closed door to the locals.

Now the Georgetown people have to live with the bare, ugly canal at their doorsteps because of Joe Biden and his bureaucrats' "historic preservation."

While it's doubtful that they'll make a connection between those slammed doors and butt-ugly canals in their front yard, it does provide a useful lesson to the rest of us about whether we as citizens are ever going to see beautiful things again as well as get listened to.

As Georgetown demonstrates, Trump and his men listen to all citizens even if they vote Democrat and he works with them to get the liveability they desire.

Joe Biden would rather keep all the power to himself, shut out even his loyal supporters, and force them to live in ugly quarters, not just because he's a vulgar man himself with no understanding of aesthetics, but just because he can.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2024/03/bidesthetics_washington_d_c_residents_note_that_trump_created_beauty_biden_mandated_eyesores_on_their_city.html

Anonymous ID: 930762 April 3, 2024, 11:24 p.m. No.20676170 🗄️.is 🔗kun >>6172

>>20676168

hey bo

ive got to log off

back in a bit