>>20691739

Let's break this down:

Entering and remaining in a restricted building

disorderly and disruptive conduct

disorderly conduct

parading, demonstrating or picketing in a capitol.

Wait a minute, if she was peacefully assembling and exercising her right to petition the government then there are no violations of the law whatsoever, it is her right. Plus prayer is Freedom of religion. Both protected by the 1st Amendment.

Amendment 1

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

>>20691739

>>20691837

Notable

The 1st Amendment protects Granny in 4 ways:

the right to assemble

the right to petition the government

the right to free speech

the right to exercise her religion

Game over

>>20691862

This is law 101, and the attorneys should do this pro bono, it is an easy peasy case to win. Why are the attorneys making this into a money making machine? Shame on them, two heads of the same snake. Make them famous anons.

>>20691739

>restricted

What does restricted mean anyways?

The building has a lock?

The building has security guards?

The building has a weight or age requirement?

Who paid for that building? The taxpayers, therefor it belongs to the people, the same people who have the right to petition their government, to assemble, to free speech, and to express their religion.

>>20691846

>I guess the Americans are not ready for the truth and who was really behind it.

The people are always ready for the truth, the government never is.