using the same picture twice doesn't make a pair, anon.
gosh, anon, if you can't count . . .
you're assuming it's not made for a dog or an elephant?
because, if so. probably 4.
it would still be called a 'pair' just by tradition unless someone was rather clever, and then they'd call it a 'quad of pants'
I am sure you mean something but I don't know what it is.
now you're gas lighting.
how do you know that I'm not an elephant who is communicating to you through an X brain interface?
there is one bird shown twice by posting the same picture of that one bird twice.
it tis not a pair of birds. It's only one bird.
It would be like if you posted the same picture of yourself twice and said 'I'm twins'
Dioscuri
unless you screen cap something that shows me what I'd be searching for, I'm not searching for that.
don't care.
two of the same picture doesn't make two of the thing pictured.
I'm not where you are.
why should I leave?
I don't care to go to the URL's you suggest, anon.
if you have something to share tell me what it is in a way that makes it interesting.
you've done nothing to peak me curiosity
everything you suggest is for yourself.
you've been nothing but a twit and someone who is trying to control others.
I wasn't sure about spelling so I went to the search engine and the autocomplete made the suggestion. I didn't know it would lead me to a page that would tell me that it doesn't mean what it sounds like.
stupid autocomplete!
you might consider how ridiculous it is to IP hop to post such an inane post.
don't burn your brain thinking of mean ways to put down the anon.
the anon don't have feelz in that way.