Anonymous ID: 3fa1dd April 20, 2024, 6:12 p.m. No.20754388   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>4398 >>4676 >>4841 >>4876 >>4901

>>20754295

EXEC1F (Flauxtus) departed Denver Intl after muh abortion and arriving at New Castle Cty Airport to join Potato in the basement

 

Jill Biden visits Colorado to discuss women's health: "A necessity, not a luxury"

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/other/jill-biden-visits-colorado-to-discuss-women-s-health-a-necessity-not-a-luxury/ar-AA1nmTD0

Anonymous ID: 3fa1dd April 20, 2024, 7:10 p.m. No.20754677   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>4841 >>4876 >>4901

Multilateral development banks eye up to $400 billion more lending over 10 years

 

(Good luck with that…..I’ll take the current CRE and unsecured/secured credit default rate(s) for $1000 Alex)

 

The Inter-American Development Bank on Saturday said leaders of 10 multilateral development banks committed to take action in five critical areas, including additional lending headroom totaling $300-400 billion over the next decade.

The effort comes amid growing calls for these institutions to boost financing under favorable conditions to developing countries, which face greater challenges in climate transition and are more affected by the environment of higher global interest rates. Following a retreat held in Washington at the IDB headquarters, on the sidelines of the International Monetary Fund and World Bank spring meetings, the MDBs said the agreed plan involves "joint steps to work more effectively as a system," as reported by Reuters on Wednesday.

The group includes institutions such as the World Bank Group, the New Development Bank, the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, the European Investment Bank, and the African Development Bank.

 

https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/multilateral-development-banks-eye-up-400-bln-more-lending-over-10-years-2024-04-20/

Anonymous ID: 3fa1dd April 20, 2024, 7:22 p.m. No.20754716   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>4721

>>20754698

It’ll take WAY less than that.

No way they lose the opportunity to get a Getty in the WH…legally or not.

Don’t forget how close we were in the 70s to having a Rockefeller as POTUS (2x within weeks)

Rule out NOTHING