good reminder, baker.
Don't know who is baking but saw the comment about not getting Proto to work. Should be able to work but baker Proto pass may need to be renewed if not recently requested, eventually expires. Write me so I'll know who to renew.
Also:
Anons can expressed a desire to make War Room / Call to Meme more prominent.
Can you update Globals to reflect this?
just sub out the following for the existing Globals section.
GLOBALS
Bunker = https://endchan.org/qrbunker/catalog.html
>>20022853 Posting Guidelines
>>19832150, >>19957123, >>19737197 SPAM Removal; >>20184855 Jim W. on spam
>>19089056 Ban lifts, video downloads, Q clock, Joe M's videos, Qagg Download
>>18024378, >>18561054 Updated PROTO Instructions
>>20186509 How to filter namefags
>>20756698 Planefag & Boatfag Reports Always Notable
Bakers: NEW & RETURNING BAKERS, PLZ READ BELOW
>>19089065 Baking Tools & Guidelines
>>20736492, >>18311579, >>20673838 "Baker on Duty" - what it means
>>17322509, >>17322518 How to bake/e-bake
>>17835052 Formatting Q posts
>>20883496 If a signed in baker posts notes in the current bread and then hands off, the next baker must keep them
>>20186534 No "Muh Joos" in notes. Discrimination based on race or religion will be removed
Call to Meme posts: please include in notables if it seems noteworthy NEW
Tx much.
Did notice those notables were pretty short, will look into the situation, will take some time bc there are no BVs around to ask atm.
Did you bake those notes?
Looks like Shades/Corp baked 89, right?
You're on a different IP hash now.
the difference in IP could have caused confusion because admins are familiar with usual IP.
Looks like morning baker, who is also BV, collected and posted notables for 88.
You baked but used a different set of notes?
Appears that admins thought it was a shill ignoring notes by signed in note collector and thus restored those notes.
This speaks to a larger problem, which is the importance of respecting what note-takers and bakers post as notables. Other bakers and anons may think notes should be better or different. But the one who takes the notes first is the one who takes responsibility and deserves the respect that is due. It's up to those who are there in the moment to step up. If they don't, then other anons will. Their work cannot just be discarded because someone later comes up with something else.
This has been an increasing problem.
Solution:
-
BAKERS on duty: try to be complete but also use your own approach, no two bakers are the same.
-
Try to respect the efforts made by note collectors during ghosted breads, never just throw over their notes and sub in your own.
-
Anons on subsequent breads: if you were there when notes were needed, you weren't there. The collected notes should be respected not changed. Current baker MAY add a link to anon notes if he wishes - would encourage this as a cooperative move but not mandate (because this reinforces the idea that it's ok for any bread to go back and recollect notes, which is not good).
We need to ENCOURAGE bakers and note collectors, not make them feel like their work is not appreciated.
GENERALLY:
BAKE YOUR OWN BREADS, LET OTHER BAKERS BAKER THEIRS
have appt, must go, leave comments in Meta