Look at labor force participation rate. That's the best metric for labor market strength. It's still below 63% (63% of working age are working). I mean all statistical figures for employment are crap, but I find this to be the best one. I'm not an economist, just your garden variety accountantfag.
18 USC Sec. 2701, Stored Communications
(a)Offense.—Except as provided in subsection (c) of this section whoever—
(1) intentionally accesses without authorization a facility through which an electronic communication service is provided; or
(2) intentionally exceeds an authorization to access that facility;
and thereby obtains, alters, or prevents authorized access to a wire or electronic communication while it is in electronic storage in such system shall be punished as provided in subsection (b) of this section.
(b)Punishment.—The punishment for an offense under subsection (a) of this section is—
(1)if the offense is committed for purposes of commercial advantage, malicious destruction or damage, or private commercial gain, or in furtherance of any criminal or tortious act in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States or any State—
(A) a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than 5 years, or both, in the case of a first offense under this subparagraph; and
(B) a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than 10 years, or both, for any subsequent offense under this subparagraph; and
(2) in any other case—
(A) a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than 1 year or both, in the case of a first offense under this paragraph; and
(B) a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than 5 years, or both, in the case of an offense under this subparagraph that occurs after a conviction of another offense under this section.
(c)Exceptions.—Subsection (a) of this section does not apply with respect to conduct authorized—
(1) by the person or entity providing a wire or electronic communications service;
(2) by a user of that service with respect to a communication of or intended for that user; or
(3) in section 2703, 2704 or 2518 of this title.
Ask a humanities major at your local university
Was she tried and acquitted? Nope. Was she even charged? Nope. No double jeopardy since jeopardy did not attach the first time around. I wasn't asleep.
Two cases I give a shit about the most. Heller and Chevron. Heller because I love my guns. Chevron because deferring judgment to government agencies is fucking idiotic precedent. Gonna dig for her beliefs on those two. Roe v. Wade is on the list, just don't expect that to be dealt with any time soon. SCOTUS doesn't take enough gun cases and several Justices have expressed their desire to dismantle Chevron Doctrine.
I'm simply posting the law. I wasn't the one who posted the article. So go insult someone else. You wanted a citation, you got one.
>Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito both when confirmed stated that it is settle law.
Souter and Kennedy both said they're anti-abortion, then affirmed Roe v. Wade in Planned Parenthood v. Casey. What they say at confirmation means shit to me. They're placating. Or they're not. Who the fuck knows until they actually get one of these cases in front of them. I see judges say they'll abide by Heller (ownership of firearms in common use) then shit on it.