>>2095805 (lb)

Rule 401. Test for Relevant Evidence

Evidence is relevant if:

(a) it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence; and

(b) the fact is of consequence in determining the action.

Notes

(Pub. L. 93–595, §1, Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1931; Apr. 26, 2011, eff. Dec. 1, 2011.)

So, if the defendant is claiming that one or more of his persecutors (or prosecutors) is effecting a malicious prosecution, mueller wants the previous vindictive prosecution histories of his "pit bull" and other ankle-biters excluded.

I don't think he can prevail under rule 401, but alas, I am not a lawfag.

>>2095949

Just do it.

>>2095959

I know at least one anon who ignored the whole fucking thing.

Scroll on…scroll on…

>>2095977

Anon, I hardly ever filter, so I don't know. I think there is a way, but it's too much time wasted for me when I can just scroll on by…

>>2096006

Looks to me like Mueller is trying to keep the histories of his tag-team of prosecutorial predators from being brought before the jury.

If I'm the defendant in the case, and the TEAM trying me have gone far outside the scope of their intended focus and also evidence a history of malicious or predatory prosecution, I'm going to raise this issue, on appeal if nothing else.

Mueller's trying to claim the truth about his team would prejudice a jury. Well, no shit.