>>2100770
The news crews filming the WH evac swung the cam up and filmed it.
Cheney, who ran the 911 Op, was either onboard the E-4B or datalinked to it.
The significance of that aircraft being over the area on 911 means the crew watched the 'airliners' or whatever, hit the buildings on their consoles, didn't lift a finger to scramble interceptors, which were in fact ordered to stand-down.
The E-4B 1. violated the WH Restricted Airspace (ret USAF F-16 fag here, you don't bust a no-fly) 2. was identified as an incoming hostile, suggesting the violation was unplanned and the E-4B was flying off the books 3. on a day aircraft were flying into buildings, it wasn't engaged by the SAMs defending the WH? How? Command Override from the E-4B?