>>21112486 (lb)
>aaaaaaaand muhjoo shill exposed.
Wait a minute. How am I muh "joo shill" (tm)? Did you not just say that Q "BTFO" (tm) people "falsely claiming the ok hand gesture was a signal of malevolence?" If that's the case, then why is the ADLstillimplying that it's a "hate sign for White supremacy" (tm)? Shouldn't we be calling out the ADL on that bullshit, or do they get a free pass, 'cos they're kosher? If it's not used as a "malevolent" (tm) hand gesture, then why is the de-facto Jewish NGO saying itIS, specifically targeting White people in the process?
>Why is it that 99.9% of the lying sacks of shit on the board, when continually pressed, always end up resorting to muhjoo spam?
One does wonder, no? I mean it couldn't have anything to do with racist and supremacist behavior from individuals from a specific sub-group of our species who like to claim that everyone else is "racist and supremacist," could it? (Vidrel) Although, I'm a little concerned with your "lying sacks of shit" comment. Is that you, Brandon? Is POTATUS on the board, or is this Congressman Goldman from NY?
>You're a liar.
Kek. So you're resorting to the (((media))) narrative now?
>Q replied to the psyop shills accusing the military of being nazi because they made the ok hand gesture, with pics of Obama, Pelosi and Clinton doing it yet the psyop narrative didn't accuse them.
Kek, Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight, "Anon." The media wasn't involved in any capacity, right? Especially the "conservative" media.
>Do your research.
I did. Tell me who Lucian Einhorn is and who are his relatives and what associations do some of his relatives have with an intelligence group in the Middle East?
>You have to try harder, shill.
Kek. I didn't even have to try. You weren't the one I was originally talking to. Youchoseto engage and insert yourself into a conversation you weren't a part of. That's on (you), not me.