None of those decisions are overruled. (Source: Majority opinion). Federal courts just will not use Chevron deference ever again for future decisions.
"By doing so, however, we do not call into question prior
cases that relied on the Chevron framework. The holdings
of those cases that specific agency actions are lawful—including the Clean Air Act holding of Chevron itself—are
still subject to statutory stare decisis despite our change in
interpretive methodology. See CBOCS West, Inc. v. Humphries, 553 U. S. 442, 457 (2008). Mere reliance on Chevron
cannot constitute a “‘special justification’” for overruling
such a holding, because to say a precedent relied on Chevron is, at best, “just an argument that the precedent was
wrongly decided.” (Loper Bright majority op., pg 42)
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-451_7m58.pdf