The grand unified theory is unlike what any "scientist" perceives. It is near complete and will emerge soon enough.

The fundamental property of the universe is that it is derived from a pure information field.

It is the axiomatization of this information field that is the structure for the GUT.

Much like M-theory unified different versions of string theory, an axiomatic understanding of reality as a system will transform our understanding of its true nature, and thus transform our understanding of all systems in their totality.

Consciousness is fundamentally tied to this framework.

What is consciousness but a perspective?

What is perspective in relation to information?

Its processor.

Resolve.

>>2184056

Energy both is and propagates information.

Can information be truly destroyed or created?

It can only be transmuted.

The fractal universe and game theory are emergent patterns within total information.

The information field is itself aware and sentient.

>>2197136

Information always exists in infinite forms. It existed before you conceived it and will exist after. What you did was write down symbols that conveyed some information through a physical medium. This medium is naturally transient and thus so is the information passing through it. Just because you burnt the paper and had a heart attack doesn't mean that information won't pass through a physical medium again. You are but one loop of perspective among billions, which increases the probability of that information manifesting again (or before).

Sure, it could've been some real great information, and it though it manifests in a way with its own unique err's and ah's, the essence of it is what is important and exists independently of the physical realm. Especially if it is important or otherwise valuable information (e.g. even if newton died someone would have still discovered gravity eventually)

>>2197943

Now, is collective consciousness a progenitor system or an emergent system or both?

>>2211453

Can't double check your math, but go ahead and take one more leap that energy = information. What do you perceive now? Where do the dots connect?

>>2212040

There you go.

Welcome to the pure information system. All systems exist under its umbrella and all can be axiomatized accordingly.

Also P =/= NP

It is more difficult to transmute knowledge to form a new system than it is to verify that knowledge which forms the new system.

>>2212040

Now I need your assistance.

What type of fundamental operators are used to define information in its pure form (i.e. defining the pure information system before it manifests as any sort of physical form)?

As energy is distributed over a field (or wave function), is there a way that we might describe its characteristics in a fundamental way via pure information or only as it manifests in a macro form (matter as wave function, etc)?

The theory regards each layer/system as emergent from the previous:

1) Pure Information System (bedrock)

2) Information Interaction System

3) Quantum Field Systems

4) Physical Systems

The pure information interaction system is probably the only thing hung up at the moment. We already have abundant understanding of the emergent quantum and physical systems.

>>2218391

I appreciate this question, thank you.

It's structured in binary.

All quantum fields represent -one layer- within this theory.

Do you have insight to provide or just low-key insults?

Could you take a moment to reinterpret your current perspective under the umbrella of a different paradigm?

I'm not asking the world of you here.

If this sounds like idiocy to you, i'd still like to hear your pov.