So the Mandelbrot set is the basis of chaos theory and how we have mapped static, turbulence and how many plants grow. It is a map of how the dimensions are folded and how matter and energy flow along those folds. If it is but a small glimpse from the inside and a reflection of a more elegant pattern of how our dimensions and energy flows that can allow us to understand our universe not as chaos but as beautiful - I know this is true in my heart
Mandelbrot with Iteration map
Mandelbrot and Julia (circle)
Future Proves Past
Think timelines and Geometry of not just Universe but the Geometry of Timelines.
If we understand the Universal Geometry we will have it all and what may seem magic will be daily common experience.
IMO string theory is closer to being true than this dark matter/just make up invisible particles theory. String is dimensions curled up and holding the pattern there by the way they are curled and twisted and/or expanded to create 4D that is where all the "mass" you are missing is underneath in the framework of creating 4D reality.
Why is there collections of matter at certian points in our 4D universe? Why does it collect? What keeps it there and in flowing patterns?
This video shows how two sets that look completely different are the same set viewed from a different axis; Mandelbrot vs Julia and both warp and twist when you move the other set in point of view.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vfteiiTfE0c
The greatest saint, even if he has sacrificed a thousand times all that he held most dear, even his life itself, for love of others, for that of a God, or for a noble ideal, remains a prisoner of death and rebirth if he has not understood that all is a childish game, empty of reality, a useless illusion of shadows which his own mind projects on the infinite screen of the Void.
True.
There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
-
Hamlet (1.5.167-8), Hamlet to Horatio
Mandelbrot to FOL
Iteration map shows warped petals and funnels.
opps
I didn't rotate the iteration map to make it easy sorry
Thanks for all this
Well it seems I am mostly talking to myself but you are welcome.
Rough sketch on iteration map.
Iterations are the number of passes through an equation.
My next question is why would the FOL connect most closely to the iteration map of the Mandelbrot set?
Theory:
It could be that the number of passes through an equation is like moving and stepping through fractal dimensions (rolled up dimensions). Since the FOL may be the pattern of folding of dimensions in the sub physical reality, that would be a lot like a 90 degree shift in axis view.
Made this one years ago.
As I recall I was thinking time was not just a line axis but a probability and for each X and Y axis the larger petal was the time probability and the end on the circle was probably backward time flow.
Well it was a long time ago I think that was my reasoning.
If you have and android phone or tablet you can go to app store and get Mandelbrot Maps that has both the Madelbrot set and in a small window the corrosponding Julia set and you can flip them.
I note the center line X axis or real axis the Julia is a perfect circle at about 0.2 X or so.
To answer a question on general. In our current theory of gravity it is a force or a warp in space-time usually secondary to a mass that creates a divot in space-time as it moves along its timeline.
What I am strongly leaning toward is that all the forces are just side effects of how the balled up/'fractal' dimensions warp and twist to support our expanded/open 4D space-time.
Another way to think about is the divine created the pattern and gave us our creative free will to twist and warp the pattern to view it in any way we choose. FOL to Mandelbrot.
To give a function in our 4D
Say space travel.
Negate the time axis by spinning it to a point.
Shield or fully Map the local 4D you want to move in space.
Then calculate the number of iterations on the Mandelbrot set from point 1 to point 2.
And then Iterate your ship through them - like a wormhole.
The problem is the MAP :). Where are you going? At what point on the Mandelbrot is the destination you want? Where are you on the Mandelbrot? How do you iterate a 4D object? Etc Etc.
It is my board so โฆ..
Back to my thought from this morning.
Space Travel using interdimensional methods.
My next thought was that this 'ship'/mass below the surface of our bubble of 4D reality would make a swell in space/time - opposite of mass on this side. A kind of Anti-gravity wave. It would look like a large object just under the surface of the ocean creating a swell in the ocean level above it. Is this how anti-gravity works?
Using the Mandelbrot for this purpose (space travel) may be like using a folded map to plot your course. You need to unfold and spread out the MAP to plot the course. The folded map of the Mandelbrot has shown us in fractal coasts, and plant growth how matter and energy accumulate in those fractal folds and bifurcations. That is important!!!!! The folds and iteration deviations is where energy and matter accumulate in the 4D bubble we exist in!!!
So if matter and energy follow the iterations of the Mandelbrot set, from small to large. It is just a mirror/blueprint of a way to create a 4D reality. Not everything seems to fit with Mandelbrot, or we have not figured it out. Think of it as a pattern on how to fold dimensions to downstep and create a 4D universe/bubble.
Ok so if matter and energy seem to flow with the iterations of the Mandelbrot set? What does this mean?
Does it mean everything is controlled by this set?
Does it mean nothing?
Does it mean that fractal folding/partial dimensions have validity?
Does it mean that there are a lot more dimensions that underlie our 4D universe?
What do you think?
If there is a universal pattern
if there is free will
if free will places each soul in the octave they most resonate.
Then you are where you should be and given the opportunity to go up or down as first note it the same note as the highest of the lower octave, and the 8th note is the highest and first note in next octave.
Here's a thought. "Gravity," as you say is just a theory. We have mass and weight (reality, not a theory).
Suppose it is all inclusive that it is our weight that weighs us down? Much like a paper weight on a desk.
Buoyancy, in water, isn't anything to do with gravity, rather the weight of the object that would naturally displace the fluid, the buoyant force. Not g acceleration due to (this is very important) unproven so-called gravity.
If this is so, which in reality makes actual sense and is a reasonable conclusion any theories using gravity are really just another crock of the lies that we are in the process of uncovering. Gravity is like click bait. Takes you on a ride to nowhere.
None of your theories are grounded in truth.
So, I call bs on this thread and wonder what actual benefit it is to Q and our present journey to be free of the lies?
It does the opposite using myths.
I agree. This looks like a collection of "brain farts" that are espousing incoherent ideas.
incoherent
(of spoken or written language) expressed in an incomprehensible or confusing way; unclear.
"he screamed some incoherent threat"
synonyms:
unclear, confused, unintelligible, incomprehensible, hard to follow, disjointed, disconnected, disordered, mixed up, garbled, jumbled, scrambled, muddled; rambling, wandering, disorganized, illogical; inarticulate, mumbling, slurred
"a long, incoherent speech"
I gather you are not following at all.
Think of our entire 4D world as existing on the surface of a soap bubble and the the rainbow reflections are all that we experience - that is our 4D.
3 in a row very fast? HMM over target?
If gravity is a theory,
So is "anti-gravity"
The logical explanation (observable),
Is that we are contained in a controlled atmosphere living on earth.
Alter those variables, remove earth, and the atmosphere, what actually happens? And at what point is there no atmosphere, and have we actually been there? Past the Van Allen belt?
There are TV interviews of many NASA scientists, and astronauts, that are claiming we have not. Oddly still, 14,000 telemetry tapes are missing from the Apollo 11 mission. (The angle outgoing and re-entry calculations re the Van Allen Belt). Given these unresolved issued, fraud must be considered.
Acceleration is real; momentum is real; inertia is real; weight is real. These are proven elements that can interact. Strangely, space travel is not a proven fact, outside our upper atmosphere. It is highly debated to this day, even among the science community, due to unreconcilable differences of what NASA promotes as "science" and "truth."
What we can see is the liberal universities all have ties to the NWO, and all astronauts are 33ยฐ Masons or higher. We must take into account who we are dealing with hear and not just believe anything they say is the truth.
Q lesson #1
This is a red flag that you overlook in a profound way.
qunmasked.blogspot.com
Look, I was under the impression this is a board of exchanging ideas. I gave some ideas, and now you use my input as what??? Equally, maybe I'm over the target. That was a very lame statement just because I don't agree with you.
Give me a break. Process all sides, don't just believe what's been pounded into your head.
I found your claims fascinating, I gave my opinion.
Math please, or simple 4-d drawing
Gravity is defined by the mass the deviates the space time. If there were mass on the other side of the plane it would be anti gravity. If you can create a mass on the other side of plane you can manipulate anti-gravity.
Still, regardless of those pretty words,
Gravity is unproven. Weight and mass are proven. Provide some proof with what has been proven to back your claims up!! Or better yet, do some more research to support your proposition.
Where's that? A valid question. Not to offend.
example then reverse it and think of the deviated plane as the 4D plane.
If that mass is able to tunnel under that plane then the divot is a bump moving through time.
IMO that is why physics is endorsing dark mass and dark energy
I don't endorse gravity as a force. I think it is a side effect of the folding of dimensions to fractal.
that is my opinion
Here's my point.
Deception is a great possibility when you examine the known facts.
A lie within a lie is deception.
did you read my comment that mass and energy seem to collect at iterations and deviations in iterations? That is where mass and thus 'gravity' appears.
even if the deviation in space time is up not down it is still a fold in the supporting fractal dimensions that make the place for that mass. I am not quite to the point I say the folds are what we perceive as mass but close.
Yes, but you take it to place where we might not be able to go, and you do use gravity and anti-gravity in your models.
I really did find it fascinating, but lacking much on proof. Especially considering the potential of deception in the matters you use to go where you go.
After all wave particle duality. Mass may be an illusion of perception.
note Weight is gravity based. Weight is local not universal
I believe, like Tesla said, frequency is the key to matter. Take for instance the studies and visible proofs that everything has frequency, our DNA, the earth, even words and thoughts. The dark side people have hoarded this knowledge. They have kept it from us.
You will find this fascinatingโฆ
Look up Cymatics. I'm attaching some frequency related stuff.
I fully believe that God did speak the creation into existence. And that 5eyes can observe your thoughts (thought police) based on frequency. They look through your iris tovyour optic nerve. They are bastards.
What if weight is weight based? Why does gravity need to be in the equation if it isn't even proven to be real?
These people that dole out our education are lying bastards.
Question everything.
You are not wrong. All matter is wave.
And Engeneers have the keys.
But Trust - divine is one eye
Weight is base on the angle of deviation in space the downward force. Mass is just the amount of physical matter that deviates the space. It is really similar. Think superman - he was strong because his planet had more mass gravity - thus he weighed more there. Here he weighed less as he was more 'dense'.
The universe is harmonically ordered.
Cymatics.
https://m.youtube.cim/Watch?v=Q3oltpVa9fs
Flower of Life guy?
Drunvello Melchizedek developed a whole meditation protocol around the concept. Ultimately the only thing that time traveled was your consciousness.
Study Octaves
Fuck no I want Math - I will get eventually someone will turn the math to geometry.
I think in geometry - intuitively. I want someone to prove the math of the geometry.
Yes. And all waves have frequency. I did not say otherwise.
For instance, sound waves travel faster in water than air.
Einstein was my favorite, now I'm not so sure. Mass issues are also grounded in density. E=mc2. Now I'm doing a full reverse and reviewing.
Mass is Wave
Easy in a particle
Once you get to molecules and organisms it is a whole lot of folding and twisting of dimensions to have that wave appear that way
LOL
Fractal
it is proven that a mass is a wave.
We can perceive on or the other.
That implies that how we view things affects them.
it is very hard to perceive all reality in our 4D as wave as you cannot function here if you do.
relax you have a lot of years to be Einstein.
Math is probably at the base of true science. I love geometry too. And it goes from 2d to 3d. I don't see proof beyond that. What is important in geometry is to have exact numbers (angles, distance). I also think man has decreased in math knowledge because the bastards keep it from us. Algebra and geometry are ancient math. Astronomy as well. There is nothing new under the sun.
So anything 4d?
CERN very will may know about it, it could be antimatter. Everywhere there is collider, evil bares it's ugliness. They've had to move them off campuses due to increased evil. No kidding.
But here is where I think demons and the endless black abyss and Antarctica come into play, but they keep that secret too. And all of that is explained in the Book of Enoch.
I want our full knowledge. The whole truth. I don't necessarily doubt dimensional travel, but it is not possible using current rocket science as we know it.
That made me smile:))
That's what blew my mind:))
Well, in all honesty, Superman was a Hollywood movie. We learned, they make movies to support the shit they say. Like Snowden and Titanic..
opps in gen Lol
Ok tutorial
2 is is a page of paper
3 is a box
4 is the box moving through time and space.
5 is seeing the box move through time and the timeline
6 is seeing the alternatives that the box could have changed course.
etc.
Octaves are spiritual
I attached the 432Hz v 440Hz comparison of concert A above.
Which looks more healing?
Yet they intentionally changed it to 440. This is like in the mid 1800s and here in America in the 1900s.
Why? Now they are pushing microwaves on us w G5. We are the receptors it is [a kill switch] and they haven't even tested it for effects on plants, animals or humans. Short distance so they're putting antennas on every street light or 200 ft or so. If you could see it, it would look like a smog cloud everywhere.
They've been using frequencies to cause us harm for years.
Sorry to go off topic. But it is bad frequency. They weaponized everything in our world.
not attachments send the urls
I am not sure about G5 yet i am old and do not freak out easily
All matter is energy
If our reality is created by folds in universal dimensions and perception.
Two variables:)
1 : The folds and twists of universal geometry
2: Our perception of it and where we are in it.
:)
game theory
Our DNA originates in light, scaled down to lower October, it contains F# C# A(432) and D#
Harmonically ordered, P5th, P4th, Major and Minor 3rds, Major and Minor 2nds and 7ths, even a flat 7. We are encoded.
Water cells have perfect pattern.
We are 60-70% water. Babied have larger % of water. It's all created under the Golden Phi Ratio
432Hz is the most harmonic in donation to 8Hz = (earth's hum) perfect balance, where our brains operate best. It's key to brain activation
I think their is some new age bullshit out there pushing look here forโฆ I can show youโฆ. Do this.. (false teachers)
When it is already here in us. God communicates directly why go elsewhere, and if you do, who are you communicating with?
Here's water cells in musical notes
Also, it's interesting God says there's water above the dome and water below.
Water is so fascinating.
So I think this rules out evolution!!
By design we are. Even NASA says that.
That's where I think they took us astray.
Sent us down the wrong road on purpose.
Could this be more accurate:
All matter is wave frequency?
They threw in the "speed of light squared" presented in Einstein's theory to keep us confused because it is difficult to comprehend, which made us just accept is like lower case dummies.
But it is really the frequency of light that everything comes from.
Does that make sense?
And further, that light is Jesus Christ.
The Bible says he holds everything together โ as in atoms. He was there in the beginning, and God spoke it into existence.
Satan and his satanic flock would definitely not want us knowing that.
I hate the autocorrections on this stupid phone. It was tonation not donation, and my other lame typos, sorry.
Ok. Here's where you will all tell me I'm full of shitโฆ
There really isn't any proof the earth is spherical. There just is not, and there's actual scientific proof it isn't. The facts support God's model.
Please forgo bashing me with a wave of crap. Take a look at that Photofag thread. Just look. Is it going to kill you to actually read it? No. There are bashers on there, but whatever. I researched it two years because it was hard to reverse the enemies imbedded shit lies. They are so thorough in how they setup and move their agenda forward through the centuries. This Board took down the other flat earth and Antarctica threads and I'm still wondering why.
So I'm attaching a FF model, just a model. Not saying it's like that, but the elements God gives are expressed in the model. A model. So don't freak out on me. Plus, I'm an old lady grandma, so go easy.
You need to study moar on quantum mechanics and less David Wilcock
Yeah and Copernicus was part of the Cabal, although:
โฆ Nicolaus' father was actively engaged in the politics of the day and supported Poland and the cities against the Teutonic Order.
The world is round.
-
Coalescence- Gravity pushes all objects toward the center. Therefore, after a certain amount of material accumulates a heavenly body becomes a sphere ( loosely). We see that in all heavenly bodies.
-
A lunar eclipse has a round shadow. So we are at least on a round something because the shadow is rounded no matter what hemisphere you see the eclipse.
-
There is a wonderful u tube vid that shows 2 cameras. 1 on a tripod at sea level and one hovering in the air strapped to a drone. The sun sets on the sea. Camera on the tripod sees it set. At that moment the hovering camera is rocketed to 400 feet. The sun rises in the remote view finder and sets again. This is proof the world is round. The flat earth model cannot explain this.
-
Mother nature is a simple girl. She wouldn't make all the objects in the heavens (beyond certain size) round and then make the earth flat.
-
NASA fuckery photos add to this theory I get it.
-
All the math done by the nerds and plane routes etc etc add to flat earth theory. I get it it's tastiness!!
-
What if the earth was just bigger than they are telling us and the sun closer? It would explain all the anomalies and the earth could still be round.
-
Crazy?? Well no different than the earth is the only "special body" in the know universe. I prefer to think that maybe the nerds just fucked up the math or the earth has a larger circumference than they are saying.
-
What if flat earth model for south pole being a shelf surrounding us is real and beyond that barrier is the rest of the big blue marble and it's inhabited by aliens that actually govern our little ant hill?
-
I digress . If there are multiple explanations for the same phenomenon how likely is it that the earth is actually flat? Where is this scientific proof really? Triangulation of google maps? Again mathematical error is a far more likely scenario for those discrepancies.
Hope this sounds objective and is helpful not trying to belittle anyone for exploring a theory :)
โIf you want to find the secrets of the Universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration.โ - Nic Tesla
But as mentioned gravity is unproven. It's just an idea. In fact, it may be a fraudulent idea.
Here's some eclipse contradictions re spherical ball earth. An engineer posted it.
Just explain the eclipse issue.
I generally ask, if curvature is 7.8" where is it? And how does the water bend?
If you look to notice, horizon is flat.
But, that is very brief. Lots of stuff on photofag. Sorry for my sarcasm over there. You'll probably spot my tracks.
Anons can be mean!
I really love physics. To me it's the study of what's real. All I can say, is it was one WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF after another.
Followed by anger.
They are lying bastards.
,,,But as mentioned gravity is unproven. It's just an idea. In fact, it may be a fraudulent ideaโฆ.
That's all you need to hear to determine this is a loon or a shill
Book of Enoch will blow your mind. They tried to destroy that book. It was on the Ark w Noah and survived post flood, or it could not be referenced in the Bible, both in the new and old testament. God hid it in Ethiopia. 3 copies found in late 1700s. Jesus read that book. Enoch said it was for a future generation. It explains dark matter, but it calls it by its original name, demons. Demons in the abyss over Antarctica wayโฆ Why do you think the Satanists flock there? Military Operations w Admiral Byrd, secret treaties.
There's so much valid information to consider.
It won't kill you to read it. Leave a comment over there. But, again sorry for my sarcastic memes. Enoch is downloadable for free. The Ethiopic translation is excellent. But read all three is better. It's a short read. Lots of info on demons and giants who lived on Mt. Herman. This is no shit, you will recognize Hollywood movies. Ancient giant "gods" we were told were myths, well guess what? Hollywood capitalized on it. Go figure.
National Geographic Society, their peddlers. Founded 1888 by 33 Masons.
No pictures that aren't composite artist's rendition????? Land mass size and location varies pic to pic. How is that possible with real pictures?
Funny, flat earth was the accepted teaching in late 1800s, Nat Geo 1888?
There was advanced weaponry involved. TV superheroes use advanced weaponry. You will even recognize names. They say truth is lies and lies are truth. Cabal removed Books. Probably under guard at the Vatican with everything else they ripped off. Kept knowledge secret, kept sheep in darkness.
No coincidences.
That's what amazes me. Gravity is not proven, so you tell me what it is?
Instead, automatic name calling, just like Mr. Smith. Well, too bad.
It's all gonna come out
And you can't stop it.
You will see
Potus knows. He made tweets.
Explain his video with Buzz Aldren trolling him and NASA. They ripped the people off for trillions and trilllions. Potus will crack you up. Buzz rolls his eyesโฆ "How did we ever do it without space." Why would Trump say that?
Troll master.
K, going to sleep.
It is interesting an worth the read, if you understand where is originated. It made lots of money for popular authors & Hollywood bu mocking conventioal religion) National Treasure, Matrix, et al, so I am "certain" it is legit (/sarcasm off)
Development
Three periods can be discerned in the development of Gnosticism:[60]
Late first century and early second century: development of Gnostic ideas, contemporaneous with the writing of the New Testament;
mid-second century to early third century: high point of the classical Gnostic teachers and their systems, "who claimed that their systems represented the inner truth revealed by Jesus";[60]
end of second century to fourth century: reaction by the proto-orthodox church and condemnation as heresy, and subsequent decline.
During the first period, four types of tradition developed:[60]
Genesis was reinterpreted in Jewish milieus, viewing Jahweh as a jealous God who enslaved people; freedom was to be obtained from this jealous God;
A wisdom tradition developed, in which Jesus' sayings were interpreted as pointers to an esoteric wisdom, in which the soul could be divinized through identification with wisdom.[60][note 21] Some of Jesus' sayings may have been incorporated into the gospels to put a limit on this development. The conflicts described in 1 Corinthians may have been inspired by a clash between this wisdom tradition and Paul's gospel of crucifixion and arising;[60]
A soteriology developed from popular forms of Platonism in which the soul ascended to union with the Divine;
A mythical story developed about the descent of a heavenly creature to reveal the Divine world as the true home of human beings.[60] Jewish Christianity saw the Messiah, or Christ, as "an eternal aspect of God's hidden nature, his "spirit" and "truth", who revealed himself throughout sacred history".[23]
The movement spread in areas controlled by the Roman Empire and Arian Goths,[62] and the Persian Empire. It continued to develop in the Mediterranean and Middle East before and during the 2nd and 3rd centuries, but decline also set in during the third century, due to a growing aversion from the Catholic Church, and the economic and cultural deterioration of the Roman Empire.[63] Conversion to Islam, and the Albigensian Crusade (1209โ1229), greatly reduced the remaining number of Gnostics throughout the Middle Ages, though a few Mandaean communities still exist. Gnostic and pseudo-gnostic ideas became influential in some of the philosophies of various esoteric mystical movements of the 19th and 20th centuries in Europe and North America, including some that explicitly identify themselves as revivals or even continuations of earlier gnostic groups.
It mght be considered as "alt-Jewish" or "alt-Christianity". It is not considered as "canonical" except by various "esoteric (i.e. mystery) religion (Jewish and Christian offshoots)
Some include it as "historically interesting" but not part of mainsteam Judiasm or Christianity.
Is is the underlying "religious/philosophic roots" of Theosophy (Blavatsky), Thelma (Aleister Crowley). Freemasonry (Albert Pike" Ariosophy (Hitler "Ayran" basis) and other occult-based movements
See Wiki series sections on Hermeticism and Sprituality for a broader historical view showing their common roots and teachings.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermeticism
"Be cafeful who you follow"
I call BS
Ok still up. I spare myself all of that searching and analyzing what "men" and their committees and councils spew, because they aren't God.
They're the ones who removed Books, and now we have 100 different religions. They splintered God on purpose, to incite wars, now on a global level. Remember Ireland Protestants v Catholics. To me, they are all full of shit NWO churches they financed and created, including their preacher slaves. You want proof, just ask. I have the research. One ex. Jerry Falwell. They got him on the hook with money. He pissed them off then they put the SES (that they also controlled) on him to investigate his money. Sound familiar? Rockefeller and Illuminati family trusts financed many many churches. So, run full force away from the Catholic Church who blatantly advertise their pagan sun/satanic ways, (but the sheep just sit in the pews blind). Russell Trust. Mason Watchtower. It's the same for them all, and I sure as hell am not going to read any, not one, of the books out there by the hundreds of people pushing their rendition of how I should view God. God doesn't need men to define him and limit him or add or subtract from him in error.
It truly simplifies matters just to trust God. If your feet go off, you go into the hands of misdirection. He makes a hiway for you. What more do you need?Enoch lines up with God, and I know he does, because for over 10 years I've been reading the Bible front to back, over and over. God says that's how you read it. Not cherry picking verses to support man's new age thinking. Mock me if you want, but in 2007 I had a vision in a dream of God's Temple floor. The flooring. Planks. And these really thin wiggly worm things kept coming up and squirming back down under the floor really fast. I had a side cutaway view. And God told me not to step foot in any of the churches because they were corrupt. And their money was dirty. So since then I've been just reading his Word and keeping the real Sabbath (that he did not change, another lie) 321ad Sunday Law (day of sun worship). Would God, whose name is jealous really approve? 4th Comm. Remember the Sabbath, keep it holy, Jesus is King of the Sabbath. That means 7 in every language on earth, but now it's Sunday. Catholics even changed the commandments. So fuck that. And I'm not jewish. He says read his book for knowledge and the secrets of the universe, and he is right. It is a live book. Interactive energy. It is not 2 separate religions, or the 100. There is only one flock. One God.
Israel is not repudiated
We were grafted into the root
>1981099
The whole world has been deceived.
And this is a harvest. Underway. Lose your man made religion organized under IRS laws, and Cabal Satan's trickery, and go back to God.
Start over with God.
He's the one w Hz
Sorry. I hate the Canal
For all the evil they've done
To God and his children.
This video tries to explain dimensions up to 10. A droning boring voice but not too bad.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ca4miMMaCE
OK FEs here is my opinion on this.
If we are assuming that the rest of the universe is spherical then earth must be spherical; you can't change principles for just one object.
You can change the entire system and assume the 4D universe is flat. Math does this by placing a 4D plane on a bubble - like a soap bubble.
To understand just the frequency and vibration of the electron in a hydrogen atom they had to use the hopf hypersphere (pictures). Then add the nucleus and then atoms joining to molecules, and all those frequencies and vibrations interacting. It kinda boggles the mind to try and comprehend.
Gravity is a well documented force. It is the acceleration downward based upon the deviation in space-time that we define as mass. The divot in space-time (ie earths is larger than the moons).
The questions would be why the divot?
Why does mass create a divot?
What is mass that warps space-time?
The solar system is kept together by the divot the sun creates in space time. Each planet is kept in its orbit by the falling force down that slope and the centrifigal force of its velocity. Note each planet also adds a warp to the warp that the sun created.
So the question in gravity is:
Is it the mass that deviates space time or is it the deviation in space time that is a point for collection of mass?
Chicken or Egg?
Nice man made graphics.
What can you prove with unproven graphics? That's what they do, even if they have to pay some professor millions to lie for them like Nye.
Neil Degrasse (sorry if misspelled). This guy said in interviews gravity was unproven, but look now. All the Illuminati professor puppets coming out on script because the people are calling bs on their lying web of lies. Lyn D Rothschild, works for NASA.
That is no coincidence.
Gravity is not proven. The force is your weight of the mass. Can weight be a force, in lateral collision for instance?
As in weight and acceleration of vehicles crashing? Planes colliding, dropping a dish on the floor. You're saying gravityโฆ. Where is the gravity? Gravity is a farce.
In fact, it will never be proven due to it's a deceptive lie. Part of an equation of more deceptive lies.
The universities a branch of the Illuminati. The "world churches" are a branch of the Illuminati, even if some don't realize it. That's the beauty of their matrix. Everything operates inside it. They jacked our wetware.
It's like a Mason kept in the dark, that thinks he is serving God, when that's not who he's serving at all.
Time to plug into your own brain. Ask God. He will show you anything you ask, and he won't lie.
That's what will actually cut your strings and free you.
That's what all their arguments start with,
"It's well documented and accepted (as fact) do you see their trickery there?
Start sorting out the lies.
What's make believe, what isn't?
Weight isn't. Go drop something on your foot. Is it in mid flight that gravity kicks in? Where does the force begin?
I love the hydrogen wave function, you can see God's signature like music on water:) It is about frequency. Everything has a song to sing. Tesla, who they destroyed, is right. They wouldn't let him share his knowledge with the people. They neutralized him in a very sad way, stole it and kept it for themselves.
Here's the argument. God created the universe, and he made a very special place for us. We, each of us, is at the center of God's creation. The greater planets and their orbits and the rotation of the stars is for us. He made their function according to his wisdom so we can tell times and seasons, and have light.
So what some are spherical? The sun and Moon are unique. For us in this day and age, mind blowing uniQue. He didn't change principles, it is all by his design.
Enoch explains the astronomy exactly.
Here's a couple of sample pages
Satan, and his sunn worshippers, on the other hand, have the sun in the center of the universe. Copernicus just made that up to give glory to the sun. Satanists mock God every chance they get. Even the Masonic temples are a mockery to God. The have an outside court, and they installed their mockery of God on us in such a way that we don't even know we are being used to mock God. Why? Taking God's children away, to death and destruction.
God's truth is verse upon verse, his precepts. Light.
Satan is lie upon lie generation upon generation. That's how he did it. He's still busy, but he knows his time is short.
It saddened me to know the extent of their evil, and what they did to my parent's generation, 1918 born.
The wars, financial collapse, wars, deception in churches.
They bring the death and darkness, and grind God's concepts and poor people's faces in the dirt.
Now revealed is human sacrifice to Moloch. Hundreds of thousands, millions over the years. Ancient ways? No, never stopped.
The entire story is in the Bible. God told the end in the beginning. He let us know in advance, sent his Prophets, sent his son, but we don't pay attention, and they murder murder murdered them all.
Woke up I am fully awake.
Fuck those bastards.
I am still in awe of the hydrogen information.
H2O
That is in us, beautiful frequencies.
Evolution is another lie they build upon in their web. Light frequencies to apes? That's what they push.
There is a greater big picture here.
God sent us Prophets that aren't fake and on TV land.
Potus, Q this is HUGE
DARK TO LIGHT
make it happen
HHO plasma
My thought processes is that Gravity is just the deviation in space time and the question is if it is mass that causes that or the folds and twists of fractal/curled up dimensions that cause the warp.
Weight versus Mass:
1) Mass is a measurement of the amount of matter something contains, while Weight is the measurement of the pull of gravity on an object. 2) Mass is measured by using a balance comparing a known amount of matter to an unknown amount of matter. Weight is measured on a scale.
The divine tends to make things in an elegant beautiful manner that is why I think the Mandelbrot is just a part of the answer.
If this is right.
Then the FOL internal view to the shaded areas is rotated about 20 ish degrees up and about 45 is degrees away (into page) and and point of view is pulled back looking down at 65 degree angle; to warp the petals and funnel in that manner. Let me know if your perception is different.
I'm sorry, that makes no sense.
You just said
>Weight is the measurement of the pull of gravity on an object; and weight is measured on a scale.
So, the pull of gravity is measured on a scale???? It's our mass that gives us weight. Both these things are proven.
Gravity is a true red herring because it's made up!! A theory. You don't need it.
Take it out and work with what's actually known and proven and you will make progress. Your problem/equation has an fundamental error in it, a built in intentional error. They sabotaged our fact base to fuck with knowledge and keep us going in circles.
Is it not curious that Tesla was dealing with frequencies, including the electro magnetic field, energy and vibration. And they took him out. His shit worked. Gravity wasn't a variable for him. Electricity was.
They replaced they Tesla with E=MC2, that is the "Theory of Relativity." They brought Einstein over to America, he was a paid actor working for those we've identified as big fat liars.
Please. The speed of light squared?
We've been duped. Wild goose chase.
Somebody, start a new school.
Since you seem to be the Keeper of All Knowledge, why don't you start one yourself and illuminate us
BTW - Gravity is a "force" not a "thing". Mass is one measurement of a "thing"
Weight is based upon the divot in space time you are standing on. You weigh less on the moon.
Every time you hear the word gravity translated it to divot in space time.
You try my patience so.
We have W E I G H T.
We don't float. We have buoyancy. A buoyant force yes! That's real. Gravity is bullshit that's why it's never been proven.
Theories are theories. They can't even test these theories. How convenient.
Go stand on a scale and guess what, you can determine your weight. Not a theory. SEE the difference?
None :)
Answers lie within are not given.
And frequency may be unique and may alter over time for each.
A force acts on a "thing". Study physics & quantum mechanics instead of the comic book versions of them. You explanation is a "word salad" of gibberish
Tesla was an engineer. I actually think he may have figured out a way to shield a 4D object from space time timeline, but with no control.
Keep em straight! Love it. We do need to separate from Hollywood grown replacement knowledge.
They saturate our heads for a reason.
We need to detox:)))
Weight is Mass of object and the pull of the mass from another object - get it now?
And you thinking is based upon what evidence?
Tesla stuff was used on fabled experiments.
They may not be true (montauk and Philadelphia).
But Elon did send a Tesla to Mars. Saw the Mandela effect real time.
Partially true, but what is the other object? The scale? If so, and if you put the scale on your head would it pull you "up". If so, you have discovered anti-gravity - if not, you proved yourself a fool
WTF?
opps I forget some may be way younger.
If they have not taught you the difference between mass and weight. They should have done that in 7-8 grade or earlier.
Was that a joke? Spoof on anti-gravity?
Cuz they gave you gravity unproven, so why not add another imaginary word to your vocabulary. They like to do that, it's their favorite.
No, it's an unproven nothing taking up head space. Why do you argue like it's proven? It's junk science.
Damn LOL
I wanted to discuss dimensions and people are mad about gravity.
LMFOA
OK Gravity is repeatable and mathematical.
What people don't get it is not a force but a divot in spacetime - falling it is mathematically falling. So can you all get on the same page.
The next question is why is it falling? That is my bet.
Gravity will IMO be a side effect of the fractal dimensions knot work under the surface of our 4D reality, as will mass.
Albert Einstein
1879-1956
Born in Germany,
Brought to USA by ?
Nikola Tesla
1856-1943
Born in the USA
They were contemporaries.
Tesla: "The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but no one can think deeply and be quite insane."
I wonder who he was talking about. LOL
Albert Einstein
1879-1955
Born in Germany
Brought to the USA by ?
Nikola Tesla
1856-1943
Born in the USA
Ripped off by NWO bankers and left to live in a one room hotel until he died.
The two were contemporaries.
=
Tesla:"The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but no one can think deeply and be quite insane."
Wonder who he was talking about?
RAnch secured
Not quite correct
Nikola Tesla was born an ethnic Serb in the village Smiljan, Lika county, in the Austrian Empire (present day Croatia), on 10 July [O.S. 28 June] 1856.[12][13] His father, Milutin Tesla (1819โ1879),[14] was an Eastern Orthodox priest.[15][16][17][18] Tesla's mother, ฤuka Tesla (nรฉe Mandiฤ; 1822โ1892), whose father was also an Orthodox priest,[19] had a talent for making home craft tools and mechanical appliances and the ability to memorize Serbian epic poems. ฤuka had never received a formal education. Tesla credited his eidetic memory and creative abilities to his mother's genetics and influence.[20][21] Tesla's progenitors were from western Serbia, near Montenegro.
โฆโฆโฆโฆ..
A move to the US
Edison Machine Works on Goerck Street, New York. Tesla found the change from cosmopolitan Europe to working at this shop, located amongst the tenements on Manhattan's lower east side, a "painful surprise".[40]
In 1884, Edison manager Charles Batchelor, who had been overseeing the Paris installation, was brought back to the US to manage the Edison Machine Works, a manufacturing division situated in New York City, and asked that Tesla be brought to the US as well.[41] In June 1884, Tesla emigrated to the United States.[42] He began working almost immediately at the Machine Works on Manhattan's Lower East Side, an overcrowded shop with a workforce of several hundred machinists, laborers, managing staff, and 20 "field engineers" struggling with the task of building the large electric utility in that city.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikola_Tesla
Tesla was mechanical Einstein pure thought and math.
Yeah, he was a theoretical physicist. I guess that's a thought scientist. Haha.
Apparently all theory and no proof.
That is kinda suspicious in this game of make-believe we find ourselves in.
It reminds me of a great
Leon Russell song.
My oversight. Thanks for the extra info
Maybe, just maybe, they will make his body of work available. With all the science knowledge seekers, it would bring huge breakthroughs and I bet you guys could go 4D!
I keep thinking we will get goodies at the end of all this. Like truth kernels please.
Good Morning
Hope today people can share positive ideas and thoughts and not just tear others ideas down.
Imagine that each axis can be curved and curled.
The Z axis as example can be a line, a sine wave, or a circle curled up.
All dimensions not viewed at 90 degrees are considered partial dimensions or fractal. Our perception inside the 4D system is we can only perceive with our senses the 90 degree dimensions. We can envision (ie the Z axis on a sheet of paper is a 0.5 dimension at 45 degree angle) the others but not perceive them.
There may be very defined number of dimensions or infinite I do not know.
Love is the strongest force in the universe.
Some things, with mere observation, should be self evident.
What would hold the universe together and not be dark matter and dark energy would be the folding knotting of fractal dimensions to support and pull the depression in space time we call gravity.
Could you show us the formula for that? I don't remember learning about "the folding knot of fractal dimensions" in advance math classes.
Maybe you confused with Gordian knot (disentangling an "impossible" knot); an oxymoron and self-contradiction
Maths typically don't use such "poetic language" since it is invariably imprecise and ambiguous. Or maybe that is the purpose?
formula
The Mandelbrot is a Set of Boundary conditions. The Center black area is inside and the periphery is the 'speed' a number arcs to infinity. What is all the black is touching the 4D plane and all the periphery is the way fractal dimensions support that 4D? And if you rotate it around as you move through the Julia sets the Mandelbrot warps as you do so.
Divinity would and I am sure did create an elegant pattern.
My weak attempt at showing it in a picture.
An Example of how fractals give the structure for creation in our 4D plane.
This is Turbulence in real world verses Fractal.
The next question is what is the boundary event horizon? And I am not really sure; but it does seem that the lens we are seeing it through is a Hopf Hypersphere.
I figure the fractal dimensions are also in constant flux in relation to our 4D reality as well. If it does lead all the way back to FOL I feel that is a more solid pattern.
Energy IMO only becomes matter in a 4D universe (well it is suppose to in a few others like 11D too). The energy flow to the 4D through fractal dimensions that support the 4D framework (and probably also negate need for dark matter) and give a pathway for energy and formation of matter along those pathways.
I have no problem thinking there are 'unstable' X dimensional universes; as all that means is that dimensions only contains energy patterns not matter.
For someone sophisticated to intelligently discuss a Hopf Hypersphere, the concept of an event horizon should be trivial. Have you "researched" the term with Google?
Once you have maybe you could find another colorful graphic to signify your comprehension of the sophisticated math which defines both?
If not, perhaps you might provide another "pretty picture". The concept of a "lens" to view a black hole that "captures" visible light beyond the event horizon seems counter intuitive and oxymoronic.
Thanks for playing
Obviously, big words =/= big understanding
The grand unified theory is unlike what any "scientist" perceives. It is near complete and will emerge soon enough.
The fundamental property of the universe is that it is derived from a pure information field.
It is the axiomatization of this information field that is the structure for the GUT.
Much like M-theory unified different versions of string theory, an axiomatic understanding of reality as a system will transform our understanding of its true nature, and thus transform our understanding of all systems in their totality.
Consciousness is fundamentally tied to this framework.
What is consciousness but a perspective?
What is perspective in relation to information?
Its processor.
Resolve.
I may have incorrectly used the Horizon when I should not have, as following that train of thought would make every point in space/time a black hole and I am pretty sure that math collapses very very quickly. Boundary Event corrected.
HMM?
Have thought of it as Point of view like Game Theory and that the video game is 4D reality and the fractal universe is the code that creates and powers that game. But your post implies all energy is just information as well.
Energy both is and propagates information.
Can information be truly destroyed or created?
It can only be transmuted.
The fractal universe and game theory are emergent patterns within total information.
The information field is itself aware and sentient.
Working on E=MC^2
Looks like a KG of Mass either has a huge amount of energy to move it or the energy of a very large area (even though technically it should be a cube)
What if that KG of mass is that amount of area wrapped up and condensed into a very small area?
What if Mass is actually the crumpled up paper of space/time moving in a wave through space?
maybe you can see the numbers better on this.
That could make the forces in our 4D reality the loaded springs of fractal dimensions holding that area into a very condensed state.
That would make Mass not about about deviation in 4D but about compression density of space time and the deviation would be secondary to the fractal 'loaded springs' and amplitude of deviation relative to the amount of are condensed and the amount of compression of the area.
You better re-take Geometry 101. Meters per second is not a measure of length. Your pictures are nonsensical.
What are you using for your units of energy?
Is that kinetic or potential energy, They aren't the same
How much "information" is in a lighting bolt (exited electrons) or a bonfire (heat energy/excited electrons).
Define your units of mass & the speed of light then do the simple multiplication and tell is what E is, and what are the units of measure.
Or,,, you can spin your wheels with a sixth grade understanding of "area"
The speed of light squared (i.e. "to the 2nd power") is not a square - it is a number with units of measure of meters or centimeters per second - Nothing to do with "area of a square"
A mind is a terrible thing to waste.
it is about the E=MC^2 equation - you seem to have missed that. That equation is about velocity and acceleration. Energy defined by the equation is Joule Newton through 1 meter.
all squared equations can be graphed as a square, it defines it that way in math and arrays.
Well if you can't jump math subjects just not worth my time.
All multiplication creates an array. Two numbers is a 2d graph.
Been thinking about Gravity and space time deviation and trying to understand it Mathematically and Geometrically. It seems to repeat some work I had done before about finding the point on an arc related to a square.
second rotated to make it easier to see.
It appears there may be a maximum gravity or space/time deviation.
87,807,178 m/s^2
Of course I could be wrong.
Or it could be the 211,985,280 m/s^2 as that is the line from Hypotenuse of C^2 to the edge of C^2 array and the arc could be bowed out toward the edge, but it is the math that creates the geometry not the other way around. What happens past that(which ever one) - well I figure a 4D boundary condition.
Sharing a little.
Don't know what is you might think about this videos but I found it easy to understand, specially to younger people.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSmdSw9eEIA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSmdSw9eEIA
Gravity is unproven and it is muddying up your path.
I write something (information) in a piece of paper.
I burn the paper then die from a heart attack.
Where does the information go?
You mean acceleration? That is how physics defines gravity now meters per second squared.
I did notice the Joule and Newton are basically the same measure of Power as I understood it one for electric and one for matter.
Collective Consciousness. Casey wrote a lot about it.
Once I understood Gravity was Acceleration I also wondered was it Acceleration of Mass or Energy that created the warp in space time but that led to circular thought since acceleration has been shown to increase mass. i will probably revisit that again with the idea strictly from warping the space/time as that would do both. Ie Rienmann surfaces.
I guess we better go back to mass.
Mass is defined In physics, the property of matter that measures its resistance to acceleration. Roughly, the mass of an object is a measure of the number of atoms in it. The basic unit of measurement for mass is the kilogram.
Again a bit of a circle of thought. Mass is the resistance to acceleration, and Gravity is the acceleration, and power is the change to the velocity or cause of acceleration - and all use the other to define itself.
So if a 'knot' of space/time is accelerated it would change its space/time warp and thus its 'knot' density (mass) and the divot in space/time it is falling down (note also slowing time). That would bring us to power and force that moves/accelerates that 'knot'
If you haven't noted it yet but all of the things we have considered static are not they are variable.
KG, Second, Meters, etc. Actually all these things seem to be variable by the geometry of the framework of space time and energy (or energy change).
I just found a line in wiki about Mass that I just LOVE!
In modern physics, matter is not a fundamental concept because its definition has proven elusive.
I figure we may have to go to the quantum level to try and untangle the way space/time creates the 'knot' known as Mass that has resistance.
I do notice that it at this point physics starts moving a lot more toward Tesla (ie resistance, flow, etc).
Interesting.
This morning it occurred to me that Gravity should not be acceleration of an object it should be the force that a mass on space/time. It should be something like KG/m^2, not m/s^2. Acceleration m/s^2 should be the difference between two masses like special relativity.
Acceleration should be the force between two objects (qualifying velocity, vector, etc) not the force of mass on space time. The force that warps/dents space time would be a power or mass over an area or cube. That would bend space time acceleration appears to be secondary not the primary force.
I would be interested to see anywhere in the scientific literature (physics; e.g. quantum mechanics) refers to tangle in space/time and any reference to a "knot".
Looks like someone pushing a "new theory" by misstating known physics.
Can you give us a quick list of the things 'discovered at "the quantum level" ( hint: look for 12 "things") and tell us where the "knot" fits.
What does quantum "mechanics" say about "time"?
Please, expose your ignorance further.
Not offended even though you really tried. Answer why gravity that is suppose to be the force that warps space has no units referring to space? There seems to be no equations defining the force that bends space. Time Einstein covered that in special relativity, but I think got stuck on how gravity works when all he had to do was treat it like time if he was keeping acceleration concept. But it seems from Newton to now we are missing the primary force of warping of space and measuring and observing the interactions within the set not the boundaries of the set that are warped by the objects in the set.
Ok I get that. That would make the units of Gravity to be kg*m/s^2 - right? Not defining gravity as just m/s^2?
Arthur C Clarke laws
Any force that affects space should include the units of meter squared or meter cubed!!!!!!!!!!
Definition of elusive
: tending to elude: such as
a : tending to evade grasp or pursuit
b : hard to comprehend or define
c : hard to isolate or identify
Matter
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matter
Matter is usually classified into three classical states, with plasma sometimes added as a fourth state. From top to bottom: quartz (solid), water (liquid), nitrogen dioxide (gas), and a plasma globe (plasma).
In the classical physics observed in everyday life, matter is any substance that has mass and takes up space by having volume.[1] All everyday objects that we can touch are ultimately composed of atoms, which are made up of interacting subatomic particles, and in everyday as well as scientific usage, "matter" generally includes atoms and anything made up of these, and any particles (or combination of particles) that act as if they have both rest mass and volume.
However it does NOT include massless particles such as photons, or other energy phenomena or waves such as light or sound.[1][2] Matter exists in various states (also known as phases). These include classical everyday phases such as solid, liquid, and gas - for example water exists as ice, liquid water, and gaseous steam - "but other states are possible, including plasma, BoseโEinstein condensates, fermionic condensates, and quarkโgluon plasma.[3]"
Poster note added:
"Classical everyday phases (solid liquid gas) but under special conditions/circumstances (i.e. NOT everyday)"
This makes the definition "elusive" because you have to identify the specific unusual conditions/circumstances where special rules states apply. This requires a much more complex description of the parameters of those special conditions
Hope that helps to clear up your confusion
Well I was not trying to add plasma, and I know the states of matter. Mass in basic is resistance to acceleration - like it is electric resistance. I do understand it is moving a mass takes power, do you understand by that definition it also allows mass to be viewed in its wave form?
Resistance most typically is an electric term. That would be open up the particle wave duality.
I understand I tend to think outside the lines :), but when shown I am wrong I will admit it, and when not sure will admit that too.
I believe Einstein - gravity deviates space/time or vise versa. But I don't think he got it down and that is the missing piece and am amazed physics is just ok with a unit system that warps space with no units referring to and measure of length involved in the denominator!!!
M over time is not how mass warps space!!!!!!!!!!
any warp of space must include force over a measure of length area or cube. M over time just does not fit the bill.
The difficulty is in trying to visualize it in layman's terms.
Newtonian mechanics (Laws) don't apply at the subatomic level (smaller that electron/proton/neutron). At that level things cannot be observed in any direct fashion we can "see" visually. We have to model the expected/theorized behavior , then "look" for the evidence. It basically requires all math at this level since our 5 senses can't record or "see" them. However, we can measure their effects/consequences and compare those to what we expected.
Both Fermi Labs and CERN conduct those experiments but "proof " is that the they behave as we expected or reconcile when they don't.
I personally had 4 years of serious math, electrical engineering and physics (including 1 year of quantum mechanics.). That was absolute minimum to even begin to makes sense of (early; 1970ish) quantum mechanics. The have progress far beyond that level, so that my old quantum mechanics text books are obsolete relics, and VERY incomplete.
Not to talk done to you, but this field has most of its "proofs" in electromagnetic theory and exotic math. A very small percentage of people bothered to spend their time on this so can't even graph the basics, which are extensive mathematical proof. It is little like speaking a foreign language know only within that math/physics "tribe". Outsider don't "speak the language" and ergo can't get a clear understanding of those conversations.
Sadly, a lot of misunderstanding arises in attempting to "translate" into common everyday terms and concepts. The result is a lot of willd speculation based on misunderstanding of what is actually "known'
Under-informed people speculate on what the science "says: and come up with dozens of uninformed speculation, they try to pass off as "insider knowledge". Net result - lots of theories with phrases laced with buzz words (like quantum, time-space, frequency, fields, etc.
Those who learned the terms and science can spot them is one second but debate/conversation is pointless without minimal training in math & physics.
If you are really serious about understanding (and I only know a small fraction) you will have to invest a lot of time with some very complex math and serious physics (Newtonian mechanics, quantum mechanics, electro-magnetic field theory, etc.
Unfortunately, most will give up in exasperation, and become victim of the charlatans with their many "theories" based upon nothing but what they "believe" wrapped in New Age "religions" with believers and followers.
Like Q always said "Be careful who you follow".
I am not looking for, nor do I want, believers and followers.
But, I will occasionally attempt to expose the most flagrant "quantum prophets". It normally only takes a simple question or two and watch them implode trying to explain their "mumbo jumbo.
The same method Socrates used to expose the Sophists.
BTW - I wouldn't count on any time travel or extra dimensional travel in the near future, The Hindu religion has been promising that for about 4,000 years and their country & culture hasn't progress all that much, if you remove the British East India Company (which is primarily responsible for their "modernization). American hi-tech gave them another boost.
for the last sentence - I don't. 4D reality, but it is not really understood by us lol. I have held off on delving into quantum again as I feel it is futile for my agenda - no geometry involved. It is all about spin and time and mass. I am not even sure they measure trajectory. I feel it is all explained by geometry just like Einstein, and yes I am not a physicist other professional occupation.
electromagnetic ? hmm ? interesting. That fits.
Once they redefine gravity they can break through a lot of the bull shit of preconception.
it is very hard to find a unified theory if one of the basic forces is defined wrong.
Mass is resistance
Flow is acceleration.
etc etc.
mass = ohms
If geometry is your interest by all means pursue it.
However, think you will find that at the quantum level "geometry" isn't much help to comprehension.
However, the opposite is likely true. Pictures and geometry are helpful to visualize small portions or simple aspects. The limitation is our visual limitation to only be able to visualize 3D objects/ Primitive but useful.
The mind can see "pattern" that aren't visible.
For instance, consider a vacuum, then draw a geometric figure to represent it.
Another - 1,2,4,8,16,32,64,128,256
You can draw that but the visualization may not be help to predict the next number in the series unless you understand the "relationship" you can "see" but can't draw on paper. This kind of stuff is to be found in Metaphysics (i.e. a philosophy discipline, idea but not physical form) but not in Physics (physical form)
Spirituality belongs in Metaphysics not Physics, which can be explained and proved mathematically. Metaphysics relies on beliefs and idea, and no one has shown (yet) that they have a physical aspect.
Nonetheless, countless people proclaim you can easily turn one into another at will.
Question: Has anyone yet turned lead into gold (alchemy) or straw into gold (Rapunzel). Some would suggest (via force of one's will, concentration, positive energy, etc ) that it came be done, but no evidence exists
You need a lot moar science/ You mistakenly oversimplify what you have read or heard.
I will gladly explain it all to you but can only do it in Amaraic or Babylonian.
Do you speak either?
I tend to have a bit more than a 3D view of geometry.if you missed that. But I don't mind charging windmills. :)
My spiritually is fine it is mine not anyone else s. I would rather see if it fits math. Kinda science geek.
The partical wave "duality" has been resolved by quantum mechanics. Your information is sadly out of date.
Is Shroedinger's cat alive or dead.
Is Plaank's Constant still true.
Is the Bozeman Constant valid at -273 degrees Celsius?
Does Bohr find his shells at the beach
Bad Karma - you will have to repeat this life
You Babel nonsense then expect a serious answer?
You showed that with the last series of brain fartz
my last one was sarcasm back to you for what i felt was sarcasm from you
If you want to "play" you will have to up your game.
You are getting tedious, and boring.
"it may take me a day if valid."
I think you have embarrassed yourself adequately.
have a nice day you are so much superior to me you fart rose petals I cannot compete.
Well tomorrow i will just ignore this Aramaic dude and go on studying electrical and quantum.
Things to study and connect mass as resistance to electrical resistance. Quantum to see if has geometry aspects that connect to fractal. Gravity in relation to deformation of space to form a true formula with a measure of length, area or volume in the denominator.
Came over in Paperclip
No credibility but good references and grooming. Easy role.
Be careful who you follow is right on.
You are some of the smartest men,
you will figure it out.
We've all be told a shit load of lies. You can't explain the most simplest of ideas using their "thought system." That should be a red flag to you, not something to ignore.
Weight is determined by density.
Nothing more to it.
They fucked us all over.
General relativity appears to use force tensors to do a 'change of basis' of the 4D axis. Based on Gravitational constant (6.67408 ร 10-11 m3 kg-1 s-2). The force tensor is based on Ricci curvature on a Riemannian manifold.
Second and third picture show a 'change of basis from rectangular to radial system. Einstein's is much more fluid and complex.
Thus next will have to be direct connection of force tensor to the mass?
Last picture is gravity calculation using gravity constant.
Essentially what Einstein's general relativity shows is that a force modifies the normal euclidean geometry we understand by changing the basis of the the axis of that geometry; that means bending , twisting or stretching/contracting the axis of our reality. Rotation is the easiest visual way to understand that in a euclidean way.
Any deformation in the fundamental axises of our 4D universe will alter the way those 4D objects are 'seen' from within the 4D set. The example Einstein concentrated on was time, but if you alter the 4D axis you will also alter the length, width, and depth. This will alter the volume of the object which will alter the density or mass of that object. Well that is what makes sense to me (but I do not see a math connection so I might be wrong what changes mass).
density is mass over volume so mass would not change with change of volume. The theory is mass changes with velocity/acceleration and gravity is acceleration down a divot in space/time.
I just played with the equations some!!!!!
I found:
someone tell me I am wrong that I messed up.
opps sorry forgot the squared
Since all but one definition of mass are circular. I will have to investigate:
Quantum mass : Quantum mass manifests itself as a difference between an object's quantum frequency and its wave number
Mass=Energy
Energy exhibits mass in relativity.
So long as the system is closed with respect to mass and energy, both kinds of mass are conserved in any given frame of reference. The conservation of mass holds even as some types of particles are converted to others. Matter particles (such as atoms) may be converted to non-matter particles (such as photons of light), but this does not affect the total amount of mass or energy. Although things like heat may not be matter, all types of energy still continue to exhibit mass.[note 9][24] Thus, mass and energy do not change into one another in relativity; rather, both are names for the same thing, and neither mass nor energy appear without the other.
Interesting:
Massโenergy equivalence also holds in macroscopic systems.[29] For example, if one takes exactly one kilogram of ice, and applies heat, the mass of the resulting melt-water will be more than a kilogram: it will include the mass from the thermal energy (latent heat) used to melt the ice; this follows from the conservation of energy.[30] This number is small but not negligible: about 3.7 nanograms. It is given by the latent heat of melting ice (334 kJ/kg) divided by the speed of light squared (c2 = 9ร1016 m2/s2).
So basically once moving to this line of research it has been shown that mass is not created by matter but by energy (be it matter or wave).
And sure looks like mass is not anything about matter but about deviation in space time by energy of what we perceive as mass or energy of wave or velocity.
Information always exists in infinite forms. It existed before you conceived it and will exist after. What you did was write down symbols that conveyed some information through a physical medium. This medium is naturally transient and thus so is the information passing through it. Just because you burnt the paper and had a heart attack doesn't mean that information won't pass through a physical medium again. You are but one loop of perspective among billions, which increases the probability of that information manifesting again (or before).
Sure, it could've been some real great information, and it though it manifests in a way with its own unique err's and ah's, the essence of it is what is important and exists independently of the physical realm. Especially if it is important or otherwise valuable information (e.g. even if newton died someone would have still discovered gravity eventually)
Now, is collective consciousness a progenitor system or an emergent system or both?
Can't double check your math, but go ahead and take one more leap that energy = information. What do you perceive now? Where do the dots connect?
I found another equation and this one I know very well Pythagorean Theory.
That means the hypotenuse of the static ('mass') energy added with momentum is the energy of the object. I kinda remember using that before.
smile
information comes after breaking mass to wave and energy being the cause of gravity and causing 4D warp. Spinning the axis to understand the warp in 4D then confirming the 4D boundary condition and the energy passes that - then energy becomes information :)
There you go.
Welcome to the pure information system. All systems exist under its umbrella and all can be axiomatized accordingly.
Also P =/= NP
It is more difficult to transmute knowledge to form a new system than it is to verify that knowledge which forms the new system.
Everyone seems to ignore this but acceleration also decreases length.
Length contraction
Suppose there is a rod at rest in F aligned along the x axis, with length ฮx. In Fโฒ, the rod moves with velocity -v, so its length must be measured by taking two simultaneous (ฮtโฒ = 0) measurements at opposite ends. Under these conditions, the inverse Lorentz transform shows that ฮx = ฮณฮxโฒ. In F the two measurements are no longer simultaneous, but this does not matter because the rod is at rest in F. We conclude that the boosted observer measures a shorter length, by a factor of ฮณ, than the observer in the rest frame of the rod. Length contraction affects any geometric quantity related to lengths, so from the perspective of a moving observer, areas and volumes will also appear to shrink along the direction of motion.
These Lorentz transformations seem to be applicable to it all and are a semester of study in themselves.
Lorentz transformations are a way to shift the xD axis or rotate it to view it in a different way, It is used to be able to tell the difference in time and spacial time dilation and length compression but can also be used on any vector to see how the axis shift.
Basically the warp in space-time can be mapped with Riemann surfaces using the Lorentz transformations and the Einstein Tensor (force basically of gravity deviating space time). That gets us to the boundary of 4D that has been warped with a twisted or spun axis to view that boundary. Now Einstien Tensor is next to look into and how it relates to kg (and its static energy/waveform), p (momentum), and how that energy is related to Einstien Tensor.
Now I need your assistance.
What type of fundamental operators are used to define information in its pure form (i.e. defining the pure information system before it manifests as any sort of physical form)?
As energy is distributed over a field (or wave function), is there a way that we might describe its characteristics in a fundamental way via pure information or only as it manifests in a macro form (matter as wave function, etc)?
The theory regards each layer/system as emergent from the previous:
1) Pure Information System (bedrock)
2) Information Interaction System
3) Quantum Field Systems
4) Physical Systems
The pure information interaction system is probably the only thing hung up at the moment. We already have abundant understanding of the emergent quantum and physical systems.
How is the pure information structured.
Which specific quantum fields do you mean. There are several and different properties.
Of are you just talking out your ass with some words thrown together to imitate understanding?
Cute pictures from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_transformation.
As you surely know they are useless without the math behind them.
A much better site which explains the math is https://www.khanacademy.org/science/physics/special-relativity/lorentz-transformation/v/introduction-to-the-lorentz-transformation
Come back and tell us what you think of their explanation (since I'm site you are familiar)
If I recall correctly they were covered in jr or sr year in Electrical Engineering. Probably was jr year since I took Quantum Mechanics in senior year.
We should compared notes - I presume you were BSEE or Physics major?
I appreciate this question, thank you.
It's structured in binary.
All quantum fields represent -one layer- within this theory.
Do you have insight to provide or just low-key insults?
Could you take a moment to reinterpret your current perspective under the umbrella of a different paradigm?
I'm not asking the world of you here.
If this sounds like idiocy to you, i'd still like to hear your pov.
Not sure but I think it would be
potential (ie statistics).
Move beyond 4D and you are in a system that is not a physical reality but with the potential to become a 4D reality. The energy is all there but the dimensional space is fluid and changing and dynamic except at the 'special' dimensional clicks where the 'arrangement' can 'bind' into a physical 'outside' reality
yea I know I can do the math barely on the time and x axis on a vector makes by brain hurt, and Reinmann surfaces I am just touching the topic with a glancing understanding, well so far.
after and arguement in general about energy and force last night I must admit.
E and F are not exactly the same except for every meter cumulative E= F * meter.
Then it dawned on me Gravity is a force on space time - thus units have to be G= kg/m or G=kg/m^2 or kg/m/s^2 - but kg has to be in there, not m/s^2.
There appears to be some issues with our unit definitions at least at that level of physics.
?G=kg/m/s^2 ?
Acceleration would just be the difference between space-time deviations of objects right?
Goals - Schwartzchild radius and Plank Constant will define the smallest amount of energy in smallest area of space - base. then Einstien Tensor etc.
and E=Fm doesn't make sense either E is both SE (static energy) and KE (kinetic energy), and Fm would not define KE - F/m^2 might.
I better get ready for work F, E, and G are all melding into one force in my mind - ahhhhh.
I keep getting to the point all energy/force is just acting on the axis of our reality - not us - well unless you follow the thought that 'us' are protrusions of twisted warped axis to create a standing wave in within the surrounding axis. Ahhh I need a brain nap.
Once you move beyond a 4D physical reality all the rules change. There is no mass thus no resistance, There is no work for there is nothing to move as flow proceeds without impediment. I see it as pattern, all axis relax to normal position and all energy sits in potential. To define further you would have to define a set and calculate the probabilities of an event not forgetting that the 'set ' is not isolated and the probability of an outside influence affecting the event (ie chaos theory).
Good video in the first min :)
On the way home thought - well the Lorentz transformation is basically just rotation around the Y axis and that is easily solved with trig and the pytharean theorm. Then in the first minute arctangent. I will have to check the math as I was pretty sure it would be sin and cosine and solving for hypotenuse or side. And if it this simple there is no reason for a series of solutions - it is a freakin table.
Wait I was doing this graphically a few months rotating Pythagorean theorems in 3 D space.
What is going on in Lorentz is the rotation of axis and frame of reference. Rotation around Y axis. This cause a perception of time dilation and length shortening. This can be perceived also as acceleration and deviation of space time that creates an area of space-time that has a divot. opps I just went beyond physics sorry.
Basically as I perceive it Schwarzchild radius is the total compression of mass excluding volume. The Planck length is the smallest measure that can be 3-4 D. I you placed that smallest mass over the smallest length? i will have to check the units but โฆ. is that the force that is every unit of space-time or is that the energy to break through space time?
your video so does not take it to the next level and bring it to geometry.I get algebra has to fit. I am geofag. so annoying algebra when I know it is just a rotation around Y.
So a series of 5 videos to try and explain something I got in a moment of free time?
People all we see and experience can be placed in Euclidean geometry if you spin the axis!!!!!!!
LISTEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YES you can take it 4 or 7 or 11 D but for here you can figure it out if your mind is multi D and you can spin it , twist it and view in a different way - see hopf
You may use different terms from point of view, to acceleration, to warp in space time, to WTF.
But :) That is how you get to TOE
He started out so well and went back to traditional bs in later vids
The Lortetz transformation is a rotation on Y axis easy geo solve. Don't need all this bullshit. If want to do x can or time can. if want a vector can and all axis change!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WTF it is rotation of axis!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DEFINE the angle of change and it is FUCKING Pythagorean!!!
sigh.
Draw a 3D axis
Rotate it around the Y axis - the time as Z dilates, and the X and length contracts. That is Lorentz.
The few people here that actually understand the "big words" you use also notice how you misuse the to mislead.
Notice that those that are overpowered by your use of that "cut & paste" level of "understanding" sprinkle with pure BS can't respond and those who see through your charade don't bother.
The few responses you get are idiotic questions that make no sense
What is sad is that you are pathetic enough to need this kind of phukery for your self-esteem.
Information is "structured in binary" although all form of energy are waves (i.e. frequency/wavelength). Binary is discrete and has limited ability to represent analog waves.
See Fourier analysis vs Fourier synthesis, The limits are illustrated in the NyquistโShannon sampling theorem. I have cut & pasted a section that highlights that limitation.
<snipfrom https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nyquist%E2%80%93Shannon_sampling_theorem
Sampling is a process of converting a signal (for example, a function of continuous time and/or space) into a numeric sequence (a function of discrete time and/or space). Shannon's version of the theorem states:[2]
If a function x(t) contains no frequencies higher than B hertz, it is completely determined by giving its ordinates at a series of points spaced 1/(2B) seconds apart.
A sufficient sample-rate is therefore anything larger than 2B samples per second. Equivalently, for a given sample rate fs, perfect reconstruction is guaranteed possible for a bandlimit B < fs/2.
When the bandlimit is too high (or there is no bandlimit), the reconstruction exhibits imperfections known as aliasing.
<snip end>
Short summary - Conversion from binary to digital can be "adequate approximation" if the sampling rare is high enough (fi.e.faster).
But the converse is not true because "an adequate approximation" can not be reconstructed because, by definition ("i.e.adequate approximation) is not granular enough,
QED
the difference here is ego. Here i have none. What you show is basically a tendency to be passive aggressive which is way to subvert others to advance your own agenda.
Yes I advance mine but honesty I give ideas even if not sure I admit when a bit off and I ask for others ideas?
Do you?
No you act superior to just barely equal.
Please re-evaluate your approach to life.
>Sampling is a process of converting a signal (for example, a function of continuous time and/or space) into a numeric sequence
A Reinmann surface? See it can be just not one field it is all fields. It has to be all fields to be a TOE
I will add Fourier to my research.
tell me if I am wrong.
Einstein learned you had to spin the axis (Lorentz) and then added a tensor to bend space time. Is that tensor 90 degrees as is should be or is it following the Reinman surface? It does not matter geometry can figure it out. IE - bifurcations of reinmann set to map the fluid bend in 4d. i will figure out how to twist the axis so it is a function soon.
You ask for insight and got it (Post 2225623 - trips)
Now you want to play the victim card?
According to you, I am "barely you equal", but in your previous post you "had no ego"
Why no intelligent response, It should be trivial for a genius like you.
Why the butt hurt? Just decimate my argument.
My approach to life in to expose fraudsters like you. I see why you would want me to "change my approach". You feel bullied
The nature and tone over you many, many posts shows everyone how you operate.
Bombard us with YOUR superior knowledge and insight.
When challenged, cry like a little butt-hurt biatch, and re-emphasize that you consider me "barely equal" to you.
Make your case and stop crying,
Grow some balls, counter my argument or GTFO.
We don't need anymore one-side lectures from your over-inflated ego; a bully who cries if he gets hit.
QED
LMFAO
'how you use to mislead'
first sentence>>2225623
.passive aggressive.
i don't care if you have a different field and view. I call you out because you tell me wrong without solid evidence. You may be right, I may be wrong, You may be wrong and I am right, we may both be right, or we may both be wrong. That is logic.
from gen
Planck is smallest length.
Schwart is smallest mass
mass over length should be the smallest part of 4D.
copy
actually the energy on space time units should be realistically.
kg/m^3/sec
and the base unit of the smallest should be kg/planck*3/sec
copy
The funny part about mass is it is all just energy and has nothing to do with what we think as mass.
It is the velocity, the rotation, the wave amplitude, the only part of it we see as mass is the wave pattern that is static.
copy
The static energy of a mass is basically a force it is potential. the Kinetic energy is energy as it is active, as is the spin. The spin and amplitude of the wave of an object are a force as they are potential energy to be released.
and energy is mass.
copy
Einstein proved in basic physics and with equations ll reality is just perspective. Lorentz, reinnmann, and tensor. Research.
copy
i must correct Force is an outside energy acting on โฆ
Energy is internal or inherent
Both are energy and a force but one is within and one is exerted externally like a tensor.
This is what happens when you put your physics book into a shredder and then grab the shreds to compose a sentence.
Not gonna waste time countering
Simple Google kinetic energy and potential energy and you will see how incoherent that "statement" is
Base energy over base area per mass should be.
Planck Constant (energy)/Schwartzchild Radius=
6.626070040(81)ร10โ34 (kgm^2/s^2)s over/
2(6.674ร10โ11 m/s^2ยทkgโ2ยทm2)*mass/c^2
or
the number divided out is
49640325258312756215088.821230791
sorting that jumble of units ahhh it should be an energy over a unit of space/time.
so does that mean?
Mass * 49640325258312756215088.821230791 is the energy on the smallest radius of space/time?
Einstein didn't prove jack shit.
He was hired by the enemies within to run the circles game on your mind.
Frequency is the physical reflection of the element of the "matter" in the wave. It has matter. It has substance, light has substance, and gravity, your junk science remedy you can't let go of, has zero to do with it, because it is non-existant.
It is only planted in your face for "chaos. They love their God "chaos."
It's in all their handbooks.
Proof will be you will never get to a "formula" that actually checks out. Never.
What if there's actually no line of division between kinetic and potential energy? What is your measuring tool worth?
Waves never shut down, but signals do.
Bravo! You describe the chaos perfectly, except you left out
the constant of chaos
= you will never be right.
But good luck.
Actually that is addressed Frequency and Amplitude to matter - I just haven't figured it out yet and got there yet. It has also been admitted that there is gravity to energy and gravity is just the transformation of the axis viewed as bent space-time, first step for physics to get to the full pattern.
My plan was to graph the Planck length on the X and the Schwartzchild Radius on Y with the deviation arc of space-time below the X . But wow the difference will dwarf the Planck at 10^-35, and 1 unit of Schwartzchild (kg) at 10^-5. So my graph cannot be to scale.
The plan was to show the deviation of space time per unit length, then area per set of mass and then energy. It appears the triangle though a right triangle has a huge Y and very tiny X axis and thus is very hard to show the process of bisecting the hypotenuse to find the arc of deviation and repeat to find the Reinmann Surface of the deviation of space time. I can show you but it will not be to scale
The numbers are:
1.616228 X 10-35 as X
and
1.485183 X 10^-5 as Y or negative Y
Then an arc from 0 X to 2 times the value of X
Then figure hypotenuse of right triangle of the XY
then bisect and you can figure the midpoint of arc (space time variation) at the 45 degree (270-45). And repeat if you need to define the Reinmann surface in a simple 2D process.
In Lorentz transformations it is a smaller triangle and easier to see the shift around the axis.
Gravity is just a transformation - just like Lorentz. It is just spinning the axis.
It is odd the base is so far pushed into the axis LOL.
It is also the amount of energy to keep our base unit of space time in place. We are soo far.
I see progress, but it's a contradiction of terms, admitted that gravityโฆ,
when gravity is an unproven theory.
Weight is real, determined by density.
Divot divot wherever you are not made up, is weight of any matter sinking or slung, splatting into whatever other matter it hits. Where it splats is at the heart of what you seek to know.
There is no chaos involved.
This is a universe of order.
There is always weight, no matter what they say, however minute or insignificant it may seem, it's key. Matter matters.
Acceleration, speed, angle, inertia, etc., of the matter sinking or slung defines the divot. Divots are not all equal, but show me a divot that's not a dead end?
Motion has origin so does movement. That force has nothing do do with gravity.
Time is personal, local.
Gravity is make believe.
Time-Space-Gravity are just words that do not belong in "formulas," but Einstein knew that already.
It is already, and it doesn't change.
Chasing changes that will never change. We live in an ordered universe.
weight is nothing it is defined by locality.
Mass is Energy. Axis are POF of reality. Physics just is lost in the algebra.
as I said before
it appears all is force on axis and what we see/experience perceive is just a spin of those axis
That makes no sense, using Einstein.
If mass is energy. Algebra says
Energy is mass.
Where is the speed of light2?
See how fucked up Einstein is?
Keep going, you will, maybe, eventually.
Algebra you can count on.
Once I thought physics was math based and I could count on it, but it is far from that.
Math doesn't lie,
so what happened? Really?
The key is not you.
The key is using the math to convince the 100th monkey. You may not get that all force is energy and all energy affects the axis and all axis are define our perception and that we have the ability to change that, but i weigh 170 Lbs.
Is that 170lb on your spinning axis?
Sorry, just a funny I couldn't resist. I'm no key and never said I was.
But there comes a time see the difference between science fiction and science. The two don't mix, and if true, physics could not get "lost" in math, algebra or geometry, no matter how hard it tries to hide.
No need to get uppity in your PhD.
Of course I know force is energy. There's energy behind force. I guess there's รthe speed of light2 too!
Laughing out loud now.
Add in some more components.
Chaos likes that.
Ok. Not meaning to piss anyone off. I'll check in on your progress in a couple of days. Hopefully you ditch the Einstein guy and fire up your own brain cells.
Another firm of energy.
Speed of light
Inside your brain.
Damn, Einstein was so smart.
Go figure. Good luck.
What you don't get is chaos theory is based in fractals outside 4D and well defined.
if you stop your tirade and use Pythagorean theorem you may figure it out.
Ran across this.
Might be helpful.
Planck length over Schwartzchild Radius
Ultimately it may actually come down to that if the axis are just twisted and knotted to make the appearance of mass - like a far off Mandelbrot connected by a filament.
8 dimensional model of the universe
https://www.ted.com/talks/garrett_lisi_on_his_theory_of_everything/transcript
>https://www.ted.com/talks/garrett_lisi_on_his_theory_of_everything/transcript
I have been humbled.
I figured someone had figured all this out before.
E8 Lie Group
picture shows how dimensions can form a 4D bubble of reality. Is it at every point or just supporting from the underneath or outside?
Copy
So basically quantum computing should be?
ON
OFF
Degree of ON (dimmer switch?)
Nice boardโฆ
Donโt know if it as been posted but you can use mandelbulber to generate some fractal geometryโฆ
Pythagorean Theorem 3D question?
Raised to the second.
The Lorentz Transformation is essentially a rotation around the Y axis- lengthening/dilating the time axis and shortening the X axis
A graphic for Lorentz transformation move from 1 to 2.
That shows cube in X axis getting shorter, and cube in T axis stretching.
forgot graphic
they are not c^2 is (m^2)/(s^2)
joule is therefore newton meter
you could argue that momentum is energy but not force
momentum is kinetic energy.
Force is potential energy that has not been used yet, basically.
You know I think you are onto something there.
E is SE - static energy and
F is KE - kinetic energy
And TE = SE + KE Or TE = E+F
thus
TE = mc^2 + ma
= kg 89,875,517,873,681,768 m/s^2 + kg m/s^2
I you apply trig to E=mc^2?
Would that make 423,970,560m/s^2 the radius of 1 kg of mass uncompressed?
or 1 KG of mass has radius of 423,970,560 light meters uncompressed?
>>2259108>
>2259170
E=mc^2
423,970,560 m/s^2 (Kg in lightmeters) * 89,875,571,873,681,764 m/s^2 (c^2)=
38,104,573,643,194,868,440,750,080 m/s^2 (lightmeters)
No I don't think so probably just the Hypotenuse.
The Hypotenuse of the 'Light Square' that 423970560 m/sec^2
or 1.41421356237309505 of Speed of Light.
Mass Radius has inluence beyond the light square of our 4D universe. The area that space time warps, and the spiral connection to the Mandelbrot Space.
Copy:
Speed of Light squared is the light square our 4D world exsists in.
They hypotenuse of that square - 423,970,560 m/s^2 is the Mass radius for 1 KG of uncompressed area of mass.
The ratio to speed of light is 1.414213562. The amount of radius beyond the light square is the Mass energy link beyond our 4D world to Fractal Space.
So the Yellow shaded areas are the ones that will show the foundation and linkage of space time and our further connection to our universe.
The areas in yellow appear to be two separate arc triangles.
Dividing 1.414213562 into two you get
0.707106781865475244.
Next will be calculating A and B of the arc triangle.
Y axis A= R- cos(angle) or 423970560 - 299792458 = 124,178,102 m/sec
X axis B= R- sin(angle) or 423970560 - 299792458 = 124,178,102 m/sec
Hypotenuse of each arc triangle = 175,614,355.99814955902579108016716 m/sec
Damn i made a mistake:
Y axis A= R- sin(angle) or 423970560 - 299792458 = 124,178,102 m/sec
X axis B= cos(angle) or cos(45)* 299792458 = 211,985,280 m/sec
Hypotenuse of each arc triangle = 245,678,570.398 m/sec
Sorry.
Crap I need Coffee
Y is right x is just C - 299,792458
Hypotenuse is
324,493,018.245 m/s
Light Square Mass energy that moves beyond that light square is in yellow and in 2D folded on the light square or the sphere depending upon how you view it. Note energy is split affecting X axis, and Y axis (1/4 of a petal each). When the Mass energy beyond the light square is folded the yellow shaded areas fold back together to create a wave pattern in '3D" beyond the C by C light square.
Well it took me a couple of hours.
The Mass Radius reflection - that separates along the X and Y axis can reflect back inside or outside the Light Square (Each one quarter of a petal on the node). This is the reflection outside. The inside will have cross petals and will warp the Light square into a circle or sphere.
Like a pixel. The movie may be a lot more valid than we think :)
This is the Mass Wave reflected to 'inside' from the circle or sphere.
The mass is energy is the hypotenuse of the Light square (c^2). The energy is greater than the speed of light so the remaining energy must go somewhere. It bends space time and follows the lines of geometry through the nodes of the Light Square. The energy would follow the wave 90 degrees from the 4D reality, at least until it reaches another node and may switch again (fractal).
The Light Square I have calculated using E=mc^2. But that is just for validity and conveniece, as I see no reason that the light square could be measured very large or very small. On the way to work this morning visualizing how the Mass wave surrounding the light square - it seemed to me that it would warp the square into a circle from that view. Like a pixel :). Pixels are tiny points of light and color when combined make a picture. Fractals define each pixel by the number of passes through the equation or node. Me may be watching a much grander movie than you think :).
We may be God's reality TV. :)
>So, I call bs on this thread and wonder what actual benefit it is to Q and our present journey to be free of the lies?
>It does the opposite using myths.
As you've so wonderfully demonstrated by both first admitting your nescience in relation to the worth of Sacred Geometry and following it up with "I consider this a myth because I don't understand it and as such, refuse to see any worth in it."
>confusing way; unclear.
You're certainly ignorant in regards to the importance of Sacred Geometry and so instead of actually doing your due dilligence and doing research which would ascend your consciousness, you choose instead to partake in the negative action of complaining and dismissing something because you do not understand or do not wish to understand it.
Surely you both must recognize the insanity of your positions. You're both effectively saying "I don't understand this, therefor you're crazy" It's absolutely childish.
Just for comparison.
Geometry and FOL
I understand far better that you can imagine.
I would find you credible if you could coherently answer a few simple questions. That would thll me exactly how well you know the subject.
1) What is the geometry on a mathematical "point-in-space"?
2) What is formula for the square root of negative number ?( you could provide a properly labelled graph if you prefer)
3 What is the natural geometry of one gallon of water in open, unbounded, free space?
Thanks in advance for your prompt answer
Try saying that in mathematical terms, not in the language of a Voodoo High Priest.
Flowery nonsensical prose isn't math or geometry (a sub-field of mathematics)
Waiting for a sane answer to a simple question that someone with your advance knowledge should have no trouble answering.
Unless you are just bullshitting everyone.
Circle Trigonometry 4 quadrant.
Note on a circle with 100 Radius.
Notable numbers are
70.71
29.29
I am not saying I know everything. I am theorizing. In mathematical basically everything can be reduced to 2D and expanded All dimensions we think about are 90 degrees so that is how I vizualize them - after 4 that is very hard and why I reduce it down to 2D and then work up. I doubt I could do Einstiens General Field equations but do understand Mass influences the fabric of space time and thus must use energy to do that. I noticed that the C^2 of Einstien had a hypotenuse larger than C and I figure the over energy may be what is the tensor on space-time. I will have to look through General Relativity again and Schwartchild Radius again for further insight and probably have to explore the quantum potentiality as the 'petals' are probably quantum waves IMO.
I am not a physicist so I am learning.
They would have to be qauantum waves as if I am right the extra energy of Mass folds out of our 4D reality and then they would just be a potential in our 4D or a 'tensor' holding our 4D in its shape.
Sadly your theory is based upon a very incomplete and erroneous understanding of the basics of math and elementary physics.
I took several years of advanced mathematics and advanced physics (including 1 year of quantum mechanics).
Have in a theory is noble, but is is based upon bogus presumptions and erroneous understanding of known elementary math and physics will not magically lead you to any answer.
as One example, you make declarative statements about "mass" which are just a jumble of meaningless word strung together.. They do not represent the well know definition of mass. That error leads to additional errors when you try to build a theory on top of an error.
You cut and paste pretty pictures that don't show anything except artistry and natural phenomenon.
You should start with more basic math and physics and work your way up.
That is how Einstein, Tesla and others did. it. They didn't pull their theories out of nowhere. They began with basic true math and physics and expanded from there. You cna't "wish" your way of "theorize your way" unless tha foundations are accurate and true.
Yours aren't
You need to learn the basics fisrt of you are doomed to failure.
It is a little like thinking you can fly and jump off a building. No amount of theory or imagination is going to allow you to fly,
Do want you want - just providing some direction so you don't waste a lot of your time on a dead end you can't see.
BTW I notice you started earlier iin this thread with Flat Earth but bailed out on that lunacy.
No one comments since the kowledgeable people ignore your silliness and the others have no ideas what you are saying.
Last thought
Lose the tern "Sacred Geometry" since it sounds like just another nookie religious cult.
saยทcred
connected with God (or the gods) or dedicated to a religious purpose
and so deserving "veneration".
"sacred rites"
synonyms: holy, hallowed, blessed, consecrated, sanctified, venerated, revered;
"the priest entered the sacred place"
religious rather than secular.
"sacred music"
synonyms: religious, spiritual, devotional, church, ecclesiastical
"sacred music"
(of writing or text) embodying the laws or doctrines of a religion.
"a sacred Hindu text"
This is the baic model of "quantum mechanics"
"Sub-atomic" particles (smaller particles that make up "atomic" particles of protons.electrons and neutrons)
You have to understand atomic particles before you can begin to understand the scientifically "unusual & unexplained properties" here
I have personally known people with (2) PhDs in physics ( different "specialties" within physics) That are puzzled with what they discovered here 30-40 years ago that are still a mystery and not fully understood
They worked at Fermi Labs in Illinois until a more advanced facility was built at CERN in Switzerland. ( I was a consultant at Fermi, but not in Physics research)
(Bill Clinton didn't want to spend the money to build it is Texas where is was planned to be. The still do continuing research at Fermi but leading edge is CERN
Forgot graphics
I am approaching the physics through geometry.
For example.
>>2259108 The Circle is the mass with a radius of 1 as the unit circle (you can make the radius anything you want as I did with the C^2/Light Square to make it align with E=mC^2). The Mass Radius shows that the only part of the radius of that mass that is fully within the Light Square is 45 degree. As the radius goes from 45 to 0 the force of Mass on the X axis increases and moves beyond the Light Square. The same is true for 45-90 for the Y axis. The first quadrant of the trig circle represents the rotation counterclockwise around the Y axis (Lorentz Transformation), represented graphically:
Thus Lorentz transformation around Y axis:
The change in X is based on the Sin Wave function from 0 to 45.
The change in Y is based on the Cos Wive function from 45 to 90.
Intuitively the change in angle should be the same.
The other quadrants should be different rotations as it appears quadrant 4 should be counterclockwise rotation around X axis.
It will take me several hours to finish quadrant classification and equations, that I don't have this morning.
Back to Mass Radius Theory.
The Radius of the Mass at 45 degrees is explained by E=mc^2. The other angles from 0-45 have undefined energy of the mass beyond the Light Square (R-cos(angle)). The undefined energy of mass is called Gravity, or the deviation in space-time by mass. In this graphical representation the gravity force will be defined in that arc triangle with the greatest for force of gravity on the X axis will be at 0 degrees, and the least amount of gravity on the X axis will be at 90 degrees.
In this geometric theory - the Gravity force on X or
GX=MassRadius-(cos(angle))
GY=MassRadius-(sin(angle))
Next will be moving back to physics to see if I am right or wrong.
Thinking about this wave pattern it might be the inverted sin and cos waves:
GX=MR-(1/cos(angle)) or GX=MR-(-(cos(angle)))
GY=MR-(1/sin(angle)) or GY=MR-(-(sin(angle)))
as the greatest force of GX is on the X axis and it should be added not subtracted.
Hmm?
It is possible the difference between General Relativity and the Quantum level is the 45 degree angle.
No this wrong. The Cos (X) is 1 at angle 0, and 0 at 90 so the original would be correct.
it may be important to do the Gravity Force vector squared, make it a square like C^2. I have circled the areas in the trig graphic.
Not sure yet.
The Lorentz transformation around Y (1st quadrant) is a deviation into Z axis (shortening the X and lengthening the Y(often shown as time dilation)). It may take rotating the axis 90 degrees to calculate the angle of rotation in Z. Or you could use a 3D polar right triangle to get both Z and and X angle change.
In Physists speak:
The graph shows quantum potential.
The line (length) is the quantum wave of the square (area).
The square (area) is the quantum wave of the cube (volume).
The cube (volume) is the quantum wave of the hypercube (hypervolume or space-time).
The quantum wave is the potential of possible outcomes.
This is the Trig Pattern of the 'petal' thing.
The difference is the angles are different and the the central petals are larger (time?)
opps.
Total bullshit.
Quoting some unnamed expert:
Make s much sense as my car has a tomato under his hat
See? That is proof the Moon sees your dreams
Source for this drivel?
It is my own personal drivel actually. I never said it was anyone else's. Just that a line can be a square seen on edge, A square can be a cube with the depth axis superimposed. Kinda simple.
A quantum wave is a wave with potential and the actual return of the value is not know yet.
It appears that our point of center is deviated to x,y 70.71,70.71 (or -70.71,.70.71), from 0,0 the center of the radius. Basically the center appears to be shifted to the surface of the circle or sphere.
I completed the rotation in a symmetrical way (8 circles) of the Trig circle diagram (and added one circle in the center.
So you can see a quantum wave.
When you look at or draw a magnet cna you see the magnetic field.
Can you see electricity (60 hz frequency) or just the effects of electricity. What is the frequency range of the normal human eye?
Can you see ultraviolet or infrared light?
What do you see inside your micropwave oven while heating something?
You see the microwaves?
What do they look like in 3D or 4D.
Does laser light look like a line? (It is actually a light wave)
My statements are intended to draw some logical thinking pout of you but you respond with nonsensical phrases that throw in some scientific sounding words.
The laser question was to show you your theory makes no sense. It appears to be a line.
How about a sound wave? Can you see those too?
Ok Einstein saw but with calculus. The Light Square is basically what he considered our 4D reality. What won him fame is that he figured out that the Area of the LS and the Arc Triangles (AT)(gravity) never changed just the shapes with the angle, and that changed our space time. He basically used the Y axis as time. As you change the angle you stretch time and compress length Ychange picture. Also notice the huge change in AT and which axis they lie on.
The area of the LS is 423,966,494.1036.
The area of both Arc Triangles are 70,588065044,315097.0307366
Opps forgot a step in the area of both Arc Triangle area.
opps the area of both AT combined is the quadrant area of the circle minus the area of the square/rectangle (LS C^2)
so
Light Square area 63,550,978,688,480,375
Both ArcTriangle area7,037,086,779,801,215.80
You are all alone here talking to yourself.
No one is listening, and I have given up on trying to help you.
Note how many people comment on your posts, and take that as an indication of how much they value your posts.
Turn off the lights on your way out
Process:
Radius= Mass (linear in graphs 100 for convenience)
Area LS = (R-cos))*(R-sin) (100base)= 4,999.9)
Area LightCircle = pi*R^2 (100base)=31,415.926)
Area LightQuadrant= ALC/4 = (100base)=783.9815)
Area ArcTriangles=ALQ-ALS=(100base)=2,854.0815 (at 45degrees equal and each ArcTriangle =1,427.04075)
As you can see I am doing this for me, for documentation and because it needs to be shown that basic geometry is easier to understand the universe than anything else.
So what is my next step?
-
Follow the tensor point of the angle/hypotenuse and the ArcTriangles?
A. Difine the "pressure on Y and X axis per angle.
B. Possibly rotate into Z and and follow the area deviation in each Y and X per angle.
or
-
Explore the wave axis by placing the sin or cos wave as the axis and see the change in pattern.
Option one is following the Einstien Tensor and warp of space time.
Option two is the 2 graphical representation of axis being a circle.
So in our system that just uses the first quadrant would only be sin to 90 degree pi/2.
So if you used the Sin Wave as the Axis (both X and Y). That would be warp the object and show how it would appear in a circular axis. Sounds like a good computer subroutine to use for rotation and transformation in motion but not sure if easy to show in static pic.
Equation in:
X'=sinX
Y'=sinX
Basically every line would become an arc and every arc a line.
So basically that is the polar system.
It could be useful in the next phase of computer systems to move from binary though, as it would return a number between 0 and 1 (basically the probability of the result).
>>2290057 Triverse Turing Test 4u? r u solipsistic? IF so; which type?
Hi
My next step is the Tensor Point at the end of the hypotenuse from 0 to 90 degrees and to evaluate the Arc Triangle of each - and see how it relates to general relativity.
Some basic data everyone should have, for every 5 degree angle.
These numbers will be used over and over.
I figured I better just throw in a spreadsheet to be an ass :) LOL no I need it to make my life easier.
Copy:
This is the area of space time warp.
The area outside the square but within the circle - this base on 45 degrees.
This all quadrants.
This is the 45 flat space model.
>>2317636 love your creation, SATORotas' 'T' twists OPERA; mod25 throws 7x fractal, the schizma DOR
"turn the lock, โฆPLAY SCHOOL" silly recursive predictive programming (pattern) exposed by -2sin666
corrected spreadsheet.
The Highlighted area is the arctriangle area. The area not contained by the light square at 45 degrees. The area of gravity or tensor activity.
This is the X deviation of light square to about 22.9 degrees.
The hatch is the deviation of the ArcTriangles or the gravity tensor.
I am having trouble seeing how to paste it at Tensor Point as a lot of the circles are overlapping and the pattern is greatly distorted.
>>2322949 "I am having trouble seeing how to paste it at Tensor Point as a lot of the circles are overlapping and the pattern is greatly distorted."
welcome to the schizma wHERE BEE the one eyed' ;)
I started at 42 degrees then 40 and then 38
included a spit view on 40 and 38 showing torsion lines..
36 degree and 30 degree angle pictures.
20 degree
30 degree
>>2333097 "In 1960, the metre was redefined in terms of a certain number of wavelengths of a certain emission line of krypton-86. "
Q: Why was c "light" linked to m "metre" in 1960?
What does Dr. Rupert Sheldrake say about c and big G?
and "are you having my sanctity?" ;)
>>2335573 "Living page. Yo stigmata. I have hewn Desiderata."
Looks a lot like the aperture on a camera. Gravity Lensing?
It appears the tensors are at the corners at end of hypotenuse (Light Square).
Can you get an EM field to do this (open the aperture)?
Base 100 Table of areas etc.
30 Degree Light Square
Highlighted area is area with no physical plane.
This is the torque angle offset from the 45 degree to the 30 degree LS
Torque Tensor Areas
This one shows you the right triangle of torque with one side being the difference in the length from square to rectangle.
Three Fold tensor areas back to primary tensor.
To me it looks like the areas are angled in 3D.
Thinking about this more.
Red Tensor line connecting to the edge of 30 degree rectangle corner transmitted to yellow triangle which deviates downward (say into Y or time), then the black triangle folds back more to horizontal.
In an area with matter or charge yes Electric.
I found this one interesting.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_v9eTvlLi-s
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_v9eTvlLi-s
was following them until they argued for the fallacy of choice.
De Broglie-Bohm theory works with neural network of existence as well, but shows the pattern for the double slit (pic related) being guided by the pilot wave function.
Explicit nonlocality is required for the theory, and uncertainty principle is applied as a result of statistical realities (the more you measure, the greater certainty you achieve)
As for the problem of requiring "consciousness" or an "observer:" existence is a neural network that is self-actualizing. It is it's own observer-participant. Logic arises because illogical structures aren't free-standing.
I calculated the lengths and angles of the 30 degree tensor triangles.
Area is 79.45 -base Radius 100
I don't buy all that video either. But the feedback loop I do, and the Lie8 group seems to fit pretty well too.
Actually all these lines and axis I am working with can be seen as sin or cos, or waves as well. What I want to do next is figure out that area in the middle that is not part of space-time.
The Great Tensor of 4D geometry
The singularity from which all energy arises?
I think it is just the opening of the aperture of the dimensions that hold our 4D dimension in physical form.
That is my opinion. I think fractal is in there and possibly the Lie 8 group (FOL would be a subset of that).
cute.
>>2347750 hypotrochoid schizma pattern ; exclusion zone water 440. Fibonacci last-digit(s) are PRIME. Bruce Cathie' Grid Time Nine. Grammar, logic and rhetoric for Number and Geometry in space; musical cosmos . . .. โฆ
you're dancing :) can you sing too?
Just as in my diagrams I can visualize a fold in dimension at the line so i can with the Golden Ratio. That could be a different scale of the circles that make the petals (a zoom in or out); scale shift of a partially curled up dimension.
Note each square is just one quadrant of the circle.
Note the addition of the smaller scale to the current scale causes and angle shift (scale shift) in the 'new' plane of the 'new' square.
I figure if I am going to look into the golden mean I better simplify by diagrams to be able to see it.
Outside of Plane Tensor areas.
All Tensor areas showing Torque of the square in the center.
Lines are like quantum waves of arcs and circles. Any arc or circle can be viewed as a line if rotated correctly. Anytime you change dimensions lines can stay lines, become arcs, or circles.
Tensor area around the plane is a wave form with 45 degrees being flat space-time and:
3D base trig square at different angles.
I highlighted the tensor areas in the 3D view.
The 30 degree 3D plane.
with the 30 degree 2D.
here is the problem in 3d. I copied rotated and pasted back the same angles as the 2D one, and came up with this mess.
Look into Donald Trumps uncle John Trump. He was a high level nuclear scientist in the FBI. There was a PBS documentary about it.
I got it better I had to rotate it in Z axis not the X axis
And here it is in 3 different views
I shaded the outer tensors and then spun it.
To make it easier to see I have highlighted the planes. The pink is the plane on X and the blue is the plane on the Y.
Not in 3D there are no petals and funnels as all circles are superimposed and part of the sphere. In 4D they may come back as you add a torus to make the sphere a hypersphere.
Well you probably could add the petals by placing the rotated copies at the upper right corner of the 3D rectangle. I may try that next. Figure the cube point make the cube, Move the center to the cube point and rotate around that point 4 times 90 degrees each time.
That would put the tensors at the center not the edge.
>>2383427 you're almost Hopf fibrating :) Buckminster got stuck on "infinite points on a sphere", then along came Prof. Knuth. And now we're beyond surreal number; far beyond Bernhard Riemann AND Hugo Riemann.
"The fibration of the 3-sphere is expressed by the exponential map applied to the vector subspace of quaternions. As such, it was known to William Rowan Hamilton and is expressed in ยง 548 of his Lectures on Quaternions, Royal Irish Academy, 1853 (see page 555). He writes, "the logarithm of a versor of a quaternion โฆ is the product of axis and angle." The axis corresponds to a point on the 2-sphere, and the angle may unwind as a fiber."
ROTAS - T Twists
Hmm I will have to take a look at that.
the 3d rotated in all XYandZ
the last is just Z and X
>>2388337 you know ;) now apply PRIME Topography - 1,2,4,8,7,5 six points define wHERE and 7th is direction. . .. โฆ
Ahhhhh yesโฆ. the little forest path down the road of the occult. Where better to place it than next to a bunch of truth???
I spent probably the majority of my life dabbling with that garbage. I cannot possibly convey how badly you anons need to STAY THE FUCK AWAY from all of it. Do not fall for it like I did as a young man. I thought "If all of these powerful people study occult knowledge, maybe I can learn it, and then turn it around against them and make the world a better place!!!"
If you hear this little birdy on your shoulder, smash it and walk the fuck away. Run from this shit. You will invite horrible things into your life. God doesn't need you reading tarot spread and doing gematria calculations to decide if you're going to whack off that day or not.
Leave this shit to the masons and pagans and luciferians AKA THE CABAL.
Totally not my goal. My goal is to see if Einstein Relativity can be seen with simple geometry, and if the fractal dimensions fit in as underlying dimensional support of what the pattern of how God created our 4D world ( I think it is a bubble of 4D).
This is cubes in 3D that are offset to Tensor Point 71.71,71.71 in a 45 degree angle. The odd thing is that my probram in this view thinks the circle is just slightly smaller there should be no double lines.
Cubes (4) with circles for each plane, hypotenuses, and 3D hypotenuses.
Another way to view the trig 2D on the cube.
>>2394420 obfuscation much tunc? your bible is a fucking WAR manifesto . had your adrenochrome and flesh hit today ?
answer THIS adrenochrome junkie GOD bothered : WHAT does Jesus say in the Essene Gospel of Peace about pedovores?
Seriously fucktard - i swim with Sharks ; you ?
>>2398494 carry on :)
This is the simple first step in 3D.
The Face on the right with the circle and the Tension lines needs to be applied to the faces with they hypotenuses drawn in to be c^3 (area) instead of c^2,
In the last 2000 years, where are the groups that believe that particular brand of religion?
I see them on websites, but never hear of any practicing groups.
Is it is so powerful, it should displace all other religious teaching/
How do you explain this "hidden truth" never flourished among the people of that time.
The pagan Romans didn't t care about local religious practices, but what about the common people?
I guess the Essene didn't "push" their religion and it never went "viral"
Instead, dumped in an obscure cave - where were the followers?
The first is the 2D area of 45 degree c^2 rotated in 45 degree pattern in 2D.
The second is 3D cubes rotated in the same way.
8 partial or fractal circle dimensions can create a 4D physical plane.
Is this a cube representation of the Hopf Hypersphere?
The circle should probably be inside the cubes.
but yes it seems like if circle was sphere and each cube edge was one of the vortexes then yes this diagram could easily be the Hopf Hypersphere.
All based on 8 fractal dimensions.
>>2420520 >"where are the groups that believe that particular brand of religion?" it is NOT a religion to avoid slaughtering for taste.
>"where were the followers" ? they were overrun and eaten by pedovore cannibals.
recall history is occulted. you and i, et al are survivors of a catastrophe. Prior, we were living in symbiotic harmony with earth - and we had all the "toys" that go with it. those same "toys" are now being used to expose harm.
Geometry is part of the Quadrivium - number in space; a function of bifurcation
How can you use speed of light or gravity for that matter in any equation?
Speed of light is not a constant, even in a vacuum. Its speed depends on the structure of its pulses. It's not a rate, it's a limit. Special chambers and vacuums are man-made varibles found nowhere in nature.
Therefore, time travel is science fiction, and Einstein was a paid fraud.
Gravity is an obvious hoax, (unproven to this day), and so is this theory of relativity. It will never be proven because it's built on lies, but that won't stop liars from lying more to prop it up as truth.
Go back to the beginning. All our education has a NASA/government/we will "Illuminate" you base to it, so it's a crock of lies upon lies.
Your graphs remind me of the spiralgraph I had as a kid, except now, they're computer generated.
Good advice. Go direct to God. Leave Satan and man-made "religion(s)" out of it. That will only bring the darkness.
I will need to figure the X,Y, and Z of each angle change from 45 to see the axis deviation and plot it. I will do the three axis and graph it to show that the Z axis stretches as the X or Y compress.
Once I can place Z on the 2D axis of each the X and Y I will be able to figure the trigonometric function to figure Z point as the volume of the Box will remain the same.
This is the 30 degree angle with the 3D axis and the area from the blue line to the end of box is the stretch in the Z axis. It seems to be focused in the Y-Z axis that stretches when you shift the angle below 45 degrees
Turbocad is a MF bitch Autocad so much better just can't afford it.
Crayons on a paper bag would be just as good for "doodling"
>>2429111 https://web.archive.org/web/20090123123456/https://www.astrosciences.info:80/Matrix3.htm
>>2428860 falun gong mon tete - you are a either IN or OUT / pregnant or sterile / dead or a-live / benign and symbiotic or parasitic / schizma'd chaos or coalescing LIVE that Matters. . .
Zero and multi-verse Tards; ONE UNIVERSE
https://web.archive.org/web/20090502041704/https://www.whale.to:80/m/cathie.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20090124163924/https://depalma.pair.com:80/Tewari/Chap8.html
Nice find.
Fits nicely with Cos Wave on the X axis of the Planck length and Sin wave on the Y axis of that length. Which creates the circle and Trig Square on each base length.
Howdy!
I'm looking for Mathgawds and Programfags.
Nerds. I need nerds.
I hail from a long forgotten board called VQC.
It stands for virtual quantum computer.
Has to do with Primes, Factoring Semi-Pirmes into Co-Primes, ECC, Fermat's Last Theorem, Free Energy, plus things like Sonoluminescence and this:
https://www.scholarpedia.org/article/The_MOND_paradigm_of_modified_dynamics
Considering what I'm seeing on this breadโฆ
Here are some of the things we've been working on lately:
If anyone's interested, I'll link to the current bread.
The ultimate goal while we explore all this is cracking RSA/ECC/P=NP/Math of Existenceโฆ
So just lemme know.
Thus if each Planck length has a EM field - you have the Planck EM field and all you need is motion to create a current - Time.
Is that Current the tensor warping space time we call gravity? Why would it always point to the center (well it would be along the line).
Well if this is true it will join Geometry fags, EM and Tesla fags into one group.
30 degree cube view.
Let me tell you it is hard to get one that is decipherable and our brains can sort through.
>>2447192 "โฆ join Geometry fags, EM and Tesla fags into one group." add Ben Davidson (dark matter DOA) and true Anarchists - we're good at breaking things for Good Reason
>>2447114 as Gary Yourofsky says, " luv it, luv it, LOVE IT"
elliptic curves and here's a worthy comment :
Phi 60 KEY 288 360 world grid Bruce Cathie
Reality Grommets pt 5 - Bruce Cathie
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3i5YHvneHls
Robin Small 4 years ago
This man was a reverse engineering savant ย โฆ Letโs think ย energy , vibration and frequency โฆ think curvature velocity and Fibonacci or Harmonics of divided light = magnetics โฆ I am coming to believe that Light and the reciprocal of light = magnetics or 144,000 arc minutes per grid second versus 694444 , respectively in Fibonacci = Harmonics is what this light wave Universe is all about โฆ It is all light โฆ one divided form is duality and the other Unity โฆ ย one is wrapped inside the other โฆ via magnetic vortex action โฆ the Bible is allegory โฆ look at the 153 fish Peter caught โฆ that is two circles that touch each others centers with their circumference โฆ and 144,000 is the Fibonacci speed of light ย in arc minutes per Grid second ย โฆ or curvature velocity based on Earth spin time (this ties the velocity to Fibonacci = Harmonic = Fractal time) โฆ โฆ you see how my energy research ย work and magnetic vortexโs and this new Bruce Cathieโs learned ย knowledge fit โฆ and fits beautifully โฆ a bit more โฆ take Pythagorasโs right angled or Rhombus triangleย 3 = height , 4 = base and 5 = hypotenuseย multiply by one half the harmonic of light 144/2= 72 ย one gets 216, ย ย ย 288, ย and ย ย ย ย ย ย 360 So the Light Harmonics of a 360 degree circle are : โ ย 288 = double the speed harmonic of light (cause it runs two complete sine wave cycles) ย (a matter and an antimatter sine wave set) (โฆ this reminds me of cube math) ย and 2160 arc minutes per circle โฆ conclusions// my postulations at this point โฆ How does undivided light go double itโs speed in the domain of ย 3D physicality โฆ my answer is ย it doesnโt โฆ but divided into magnetics it can โฆ ย and borrowing from Ed Leedskalninโs concept of two equal and opposite , right handed and whirling forces running towards each other and through each other and back again (kinda like a twin or binary star system โ cause it is โฆ all Fractal) ย So two ways to make the 288 value โฆ half a helix coming towards each other like a magnetic current or simultaneous release of two spirals of ย equal and just opposite PHASE โฆ call one magnetic/electric current and the other thought current โฆ ย this thought current ties in with ย parthenogenesis or planet and star formation where the Sine Waves cross โฆ ย I like this cause it ties in with ย tuning into one side of reality or the other and that everything we decode is happening right now โฆ like a superposition โฆ ย including time and space illusions โฆ so 288 refers to a helix ย formed by two magnetic waves = divided light wavesย So I postulate that the Sol or Star or Sun within us sends out two magnetic spirals in unison as mirror images to our brain decoder and thus both our reality of 3D physicality and of the unseen etheric template mirror image are holographic-ally created ย continuously โฆ when I think about it this is magnetic vortex math and based on Octaves as I have previously discussed โฆ So the 288 is 2 x 144 in a paired equal but opposite, simultaneous ย sine wave emissionย from Sol source โฆ โ and where the sine waves intersect are Source connection or energy points or star points โฆ a circle in our Universe needs to be based on the Sumerian math 60 system โฆ this is amazing stuff as this is then frequency or energy coordinates or space and time travel โฆ Thank you โฆ ย Bruce Cathie ย โฆ ย you have helped me I feel understand Sol magnetics flow and how our brains decode this reality in a continuous fashion โฆ and even how if we want to access the etheric world โฆ how polarity needs to be reversed โฆ by quieting the 3D wave and tuning into itโs mirrored opposite sine wave โฆย This brings another postulation and that is โฆ ย if our Sol centers are divine consciousness โฆ ย as is a sort of mirrored magnetics sine waves (or vortex) ย or ย shadow consciousness โฆ I think a shadow consciousness can directly communicate with our Sol essence consciousness โฆ This fits well โฆ very well โฆ Cheers, Robin Small๏ปฟ
Oddlyโฆ
There's a Biblical aspect to all that.
The story behind VQC's figuring out how to crack RSA was that he found the pattern in Revelations.
What's why he used "Chris Root o David" as a crumb.
You all are probably much smarter than me I am intuitive. LOL.
I know that I can make a line a square, or a wave form, I know I can make a square a cube, and on and on. I know dimensions fold and superimpose. I know 4D is just a small subset of our pattern.
i am basically a โฆ.
I can make it a graph in 2 or 3 D and would love to figure out how to do it in 4D but I can't do the higher math, sorry.
But if a cube can be a line - i can figure it out in geometry.
if you can give me a program that will let me move this and other images to z' 90 degrees it would move much closer to fractal.
https://www.geogebra.org/
Is free.
There's even an augmented reality version, if you're hyper autistic.
>https://www.geogebra.org/
will look Turbocad sucks
Autocad better but expensive and limited to 3D
Hmm? What I need is a program that if I want a new dimension they create it at the 45 degree angle and allow me to rotate it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
and yes that creates hyper spheres and hyper cubes and etc. Am I beyond the normal curve?
But what the fuck it is all just right triangles and Lorentz transformations for spinning we know all this fucking shit!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It should be easy!
You want something to create animations?
If I can spin in 3D I can spin in 4D!!!!!!!!!!
I can shift from 1 to 2 to 3 D give me something to see 4 visually and i will give you 5 and maybe 6
Tensors cross dimensions
deep projection of cube 30 degree rotation.
Euclidean to Mandelbrot set.
The numbers for the Euclidean shift to Mandelbrot
>>2461449 Mandelbrot PRIMES - 7s
define please I don't understand.
centers of the tetrahaedron are v important
Is this the pattern to shift scale? Is this the pattern for the self similar chaotic changes in the Mandelbrot set?
The center of a tetrahedron will be found by using bisectors across the opposite face to find the point of the tetrahedron
opps wrong that is a pyramid
3D 30 degree shift of cube,lightsquare, Blue is cube, red is tensor lines, and black is 2D.
I was about to sayโฆ
Pretty big difference between "pyramid" touching the actual midpoint and touching the middle of the "highest" plane.
Tetrahedron rotation 45 and 650 degrees without the squares.
This diagram of 4 isosceles triangles in this pattern is also a tetrahedron.
Link Mandelbrot to Euclidean?
Tetrahedrons? 4 isosceles triangles to find center of next larger circle and 3 of the smaller circles. Note these 2X circles are shifted 1/2 radius of 1X circles to the right. Mandelbrot has both scale shift and shift of self similar pattern like this diagram.
Picture representation of scale shift to larger circle, and self similar shift of moving center of circle by 1/2 R.
Golden Mean is just a shift in scale as well - see the full circles for each square.
>>2462674 try Rhombic triacontahedron: Buckminster's "infinite points on a sphere" solved
Primes at F60 , 300 ,, 1500 ,,, 15000,,,,
Twin prime distribution channels confirm 1,2,4,8,7,5โฆ
want pi with that?
Discern And Remove 33ยฐ
They hid the truth from the world.
There is no chaos.
Unless you walk eyes wide open into it.
D5 is coming to
smooth it over
Minus 33ยบ, you say? (-1/3)
Golden Ratio in 3D. Each square is shifted to a plane rotated at 45 degree angle .
Yup I have been trying to figure out some of those connections.
Golden Mean with each square as a plane at 45 degree.
You'd be surprised what gets revealed and lines up when you take North and put it to 66.6% at the right occult spotโฆ
Sometimes you point to the West (left hand path), or South (inversion).
Mandelbrot circles. Working on the angles.
I appreciate you people, and you are wise and have something to offer;
that is not,
what Q is.
and hes certainly not %D
_
These are the angles that I came up with but they are approximations.
I notice that the angles are 3-8 degrees off symmetrical (of 30 degrees)but not all in the same direction.
clockwise - 90 to 86 - 4 degrees
150 from 142 -8 degrees
Counterclockwise - 120 from 125 5 degrees
45 from 48 3 degrees
There is something about the 30-45-60 degree interaction - hmm I think this is the scale shift point.
30 45 and 60 degree trig rectangles in 3D.
Back to E=mc^2 (here are a few I have a spreadsheet)
Velocity/ angle based on 45 being flat space:
degree Velocity m/s 90 degree base
1 293,130,403.38 , 3,331,027.31
5 266,482,184.89 , 1,665,5136.56
30 99,930,819.33 99,930,819.33
45 0 149,896,229.00
60 99,930,819.33 199,861,638.67
75 199,861,638.67 249,827,048.33
90 299,792,458.00 299,792,458.00
Note this is Relative velocity. And one is that 45 degrees is flat space and the 90 degree is rotated so the flat space is the X axis.
The 3D Cube I called Light Square and the change.
Opps I think I got that wrong.
Same velocity is 45 degree and 30 slower, and 60 faster velocity.
wrong attachment
Iโm trying to work through all this.
A paradigm shift of making an explanation.
A description is not an explanation.
I accept nothing I donโt see myself period.
Iโm really intrigued by the observation - โgravityโ doesnโt seem to work in water OR we would be pulled to the bottom.
We cannot move in water unless we displaced some of the water.
It must be the same in space.
So how can we move in space.
What would we need to displace?
You could never overcome โgravityโ if it existed in a vacuum as there is nothing to push against.
How could you steer in a vacuum unless there is another force to displace, like magnetism.
What if we are constantly moving โupโ and if we drop something we think it โfallsโ maybe the ground comes up to meet it. If you jump up the ground always come back to meet you.
You canโt leave earth unless you go faster than the earth is moving and it will always catch up to you if you slow down or as you slow down.
That is why satellites constantly have to be bumped back into LEO.
Just thinking out loud.
>>2498971 verilly :) introduce a heterodyne wave into a resonant environment and luminescence like sono da Orca
Apex Predator H20 1 ATM at 33
What part of ignorance don't tards choose to comprehend?
>>2521318 "My Discovery: FIRST TIME EVER SEEN ON EARTH, FERROCELL EM phase shift demo. PART 1"
he's not an atomist or egoist ; he's Ken Theoria Apophasis and history recalls his Great Work
Dr. Rupert Sheldrake will noun him Morphic Field "angry photographer" evidence COURT - when he figures out what, "are you having my Sanctity" means
Time tells
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eK7VN1pK6GU
>>2453693 I. comprehend what the Seven narratives pattern in KJV exposes; please define your RSA crack and "Chris Root o David"
F60 300 1500 is -2SIN666 DOR Key
After I posted this I realized that means that every degree of change equals relative velocity change of c/90.
or
Relative Velocity 3,331,027.31 m/s = 1 degree of plane change or rotation.
The true question is the shifted relative plane really from velocity that warps space time, or the warp in space time is perceived by us as velocity, or that the warp in space time is just us perceiving a shifted relative plane? Note Einstein showed that relative velocity cannot exceed c but not that true velocity cannot exceed c - my take if relative velocity exceeds c light will not reach the 2nd observer as the plane is shifted beyond 90 degrees.
Well actually light might reach the 2nd observer but from the past, around the sphere.
Note
Einstein had to use the 3D model to figure out relativity as just rotating a square around the Y axis does not stretch the object in Y (time) it just shortens the X (length). In 3D angle shift it does work as area and volume remain constant.
The stretching of time and shortening of length is attributed to mass increase with velocity. My intuition is that the warp is first and that 'relative mass' and 'relative time' are just variables based on a warped space-time. I will work on a graphic
If all areas with large gravity are shifts in relative plane from the observer? What shifts that plane? Is that force from inside or outside the 4D system?
Why?
Occam's Razor - simplest solution is not making something have infinite mass and speed.
Occam's Razor - is to see the deviation and the effect on the object and then search for the reason for the deviation.
>>2523006 Law of Correspondence: it's in the spelling ;)
Wave axis
X - uses Cosine
Y uses Sine
Z to X is Sine
Z to Y is Cosine
Back to space-time warp and what causes it and studying it. I will start with symmetry.
Naked 3D wave axis and sphere one
Area of circle pi * r^2 = 31,400
Area of sphere = 4pir^2 = 125,600
Divide that by two to get hemi.
HC=15,700 from Tensor that causes 100 deviation or 1/157
HS=62,800 from Tensor that causes 100 deviation or 1/628
This is the geometry of symmetrical space-time deviation by a tensor be it from within system or from the outside of 4D.
Note the right triangles give way to two isosceles triangles that define the curve of the deviation.
More detail and sorry they were not isosceles but 70.71 sides and 100 hypotenuse crossing at 50,50
I finished the calculations for above the sub 4D plane.
I notice a relationship between the Mandelbrot calculation and this gravity calculation
The focus point should be on the 50.73 line and that this is the only place of asymmetry. The angle from the diagonal from the lower right corner (41.42) and the 50.73 is 100 degrees not 90. This is the only asymmetry.
There is some connection between space-time deformation and Mandelbrot. I will start by link between 30, 45, 60 angles.
What kind of machine can manipulate space-time?
Ben Rich is quoted as saying; โFirst, you have to understand that we will not get to the stars using chemical propulsion. Second, we have to devise a new propulsion technology. What we have to do is find out where Einstein went wrong.โ
You may be right. I may need to pull that 100 degree triangle out in another dimension.
ie using the 41.42 and 29.29 grid as the X and the 50.73 and 41.42 on the Y axis.
Doing this will create and 80 10 90 triangle to purple imaginary plane.
Study physics or post on a discussion board in case someone has a new Theory of Relativity?
I guess you ruled out studying physics?
I am studying geometry related to physics no one else seems to. I understand one tensor on the space time is simple but this is what it would be defined as if the tensor caused a 100 radius deviation. I don't care about your high and mighty I am better than you attitude - old scientist :) LOL.
What if this boundary condition creates a 10 degree shift? That would show the tensor is from the imaginary plane not ours!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
But still confused 15 I would get - hmmm think.
Think Wave Universe. Not Particle. Milo Wolff
Think Geometric Algebra. Not Tensor Algebra.
I can to geometry, Wave geometry is kinda new :).
But yes it will all fit once we get it. Wave and line and circle and tensor and fractal and โฆ. hell I don't know
Start here:
https://www.spaceandmotion.com/Wolff-Biography.htm
https://www.geometricalgebra.net/
>>2547764 eye double-think in trinary ;) 124875
Isn't this ironic? All the billions of dollars the NWO has diverted from our tax money to found and fund the big tech corporations like FB, GG, TW, AMZN, APPL, is now used by these fake "private companies" to censor our free speech trying to keep us alive?
Explain to me how can a company IN A FREE MARKET survive loosing billions of $ for years on end like AMZN?
I know I should study the wave axis but i am still stuck on the Tensors as I have found an anomaly and intuitive link to imaginary (sub4D) plane. Still working on angles and values sub4D
>>2556584 Magnetic fields flatten spacetime.๏ปฟ
https://www.thomastownsendbrown.com/hydro/winterhaven.pdf
Royal R. Rife visible micro : Giza meso : macro DOR
Finished the calculations below 4D line. Note the triangles are spun and define the 10 degree shift noted inside the 4D sphere.
Drop Perpendicular off of small rotation triangle.
>>2569653 i Giza 70.71 root-1
The triangle angle shift force lines below 4D are somehow related to fractals but I have not figured out how yet.
Where have I seen this before and how does it relate?
corrected math. Left large triagle 80 degree angle, Middle larger triangle 101 degree triangle.
the new figure that seems to have significance. It is the 10 degree rotation and how it works out of space time deviation. But this obviously shows 3D effects.
Is this where I saw the rotated triangles in 3D; the iteration table of the Mandelbrot set?
>>2597429 Yes , Trion Re' sono-luminescence in negative curvature , churning number mills . .. โฆ
If the lines of the triangle are arced and you place another triangle as a result of the first two to be the two lines from the base arctriangles then the rotation of triangle fits the iteration of the Mandelbrot set.
Finishing the Tensors sub 4D back to the point of space time deviation in anomoly.
Note the 12.91 and 20.53 tensors.
Think of the black in the Mandelbrot set as the 4D plane (our universe) and all the boundary (color art) as the tensors on our 4D plane.
Easier to Read
Last night in bed it occurred to me that the 90 degree dimensional shift can be seen as an arc moving from grid plane to new point outside grid plane. The arcangle of the arc will define the perspective from the original plane and the graph area from the original 4D plane. The non graph area of the new triangle/square will be in the imaginary plane.
Yes I feel mass is a side effect of folds of fractal dimensions and returned to 'user' as a definitive result by perception; and not just distinct and real.
It seems logical to me that mass and gravity are the folds of fractal dimensions the create the warp in our space time that we perceive as mass and gravity. This seems much more logical than a distinct object of mass can change in length and mass to the infinite just by moving it at a different relative velocity. Occam's Razor; it is easier that space time changes with changing the folds.
very rough sketch of a dimensional shift defined by multidimensional arc. Looks a lot like fractal branching to me.
i want to rotate this and show that the graphed areas overlap thus that distant points in Pattern can be part of local 4D grid by perception. My problem graphed in 2D and graphing in 3D will just do what I have already done show squishing and lengthening.. If I draw a grid - 4D plane and rotate that to 3D and drop the Arc off the rotated plane over and over putting back into 2D inbetween each - it might work.
Emergent Geometry
This is one iteration of what I described.
I made a grid in 2D, rotated it just to show it a 2D grid seen at an angle. Then dropped an arc into Z and made an axis with it from the corner of grid. Then I hashed the axis to the arc as the real or graphable part of the projection. Then I rotated it back until the hash part was superimposed within the grid (distant points in pattern perceived as part of 4D)
IMO
That is how the Mandelbrot set works - the real part of the equation - the black parts no matter how distant will be included as part of the set (overlap). Distant points and sectors can be perceived as part of a local set.
Second iteration with superimposition. Note the superimposition will depend upon perception.
opps the picture for
overlap is
A quantum wave return is the solid evidence seen. it is the matter or physical evidence that shows something is 'real'. The quantum wave is all possibilities that exist for that query. Which is real as the first is just a probability?
I guess the quantum wave is the universal god pattern - that is what I seek.
I guess I am stuck.
Someone in vqc basically asked me to square the circle by asking about the inner circle of the triangle so I did a couple related to sin and cos dropping perpendiculars off the 30 and 60 degree angles to get the center for the inner circle.
The two things I noticed while doing this is one that defining the inner circles is a scale shift just like in fractal and Mandelbrot; and number two that the 30, 45, 60 rectangles are the same figure vqc gave originally.
What kind of quantum wave is that?
Can you show us what gravity looks like when graphed?
How about happiness?
Does that have a scared geometry too?
The quantum wave is the wave of a function that can produce all possibilities. The quantum wave of 4D reality appears to be connected to geometry and all that needs to be figured out is how Euclidian and Polar connect to Fractal in easy mathematical way and that should give the grid/database of the quantum wave of all 4D functions. As for gravity I am leaning toward gravity is the boundary conditions tensors holding 4D in place and that the ones that are not at perfect 45 degree angles produce a 'gravity' deviation of 4D.
Well if you can't graph it how will we see the sacred geometry?
It can be graphed. I don't see all the connections right now perhaps someone else does. All i see right now is you can scale Euclidean like Fractal, and that fractal is dropping tensors or axis off of 4D and that circles and triangles tie it all together. But just like the Euclidian iteration pic it does not connect it back to FOL until we figure out how to 'see' the warped Mandelbrot set from the outside and then it will be the FOL or similar (ie more complex).
You need more scalenes and fewer isosceles
It may wind up being something like the Lie 8 group, with 248 dimensions and each line being the radius of a circle and each circle defined by the dimension plane it is in. That all interactions of circles/lines are tensors that
may be defining our 4D reality.
Video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E-LC_l3gNuc
Hey, I have a question I haven't been able to find an answer to. What's the relationship between fractals, which are asymmetrical, incomplete, infinite, in-between-dimensions, and to which you cannot draw tangents (don't know what this property is called mathematically) and geometrical figures, consisting of circles and tangents, such as the merkaba. They seem to me to belong to two different universes or two non-intersecting thought realms. Yes I always see people who talk about the secret/hidden geometry of the universe bring these together. Can you actually get a fractal out of a regular geometric figure? This is an honest question. Perhaps I don't know something. I'm not a math fag.
>Can you actually get a fractal out of a regular geometric figure?
Yes and no.
sierpinski triangles are regular real fractals. Mandelbrot is plotted in the imaginary plane (sqrt of -1) and iterations that remain level are black those that arc to infinity are colored (not in set). To try and get real geometric figures to Mandelbrot will probably depend upon the number of iterations or the actual value per iteration. But each iteration may be a 90 (or other) degree shift from the 4D plane.
Trump
"reiterate"
hmm?
>400 posts by the same anon
Bumplocked.
Can't say I understood but thanks for trying. Maybe it makes more sense to others who are reading. Yes, I know about the Sierpinski gasket and Koch snowflake, but it is something else.
>Can you actually get a fractal out of a regular geometric figure?
Yes - welcome to the schizma. The DOR (Direct Opposite Reverse) , ferrocell and some other simple devices expose it: Caduceus cascades emanating โฆ
The hypercube is perfectly expressed by nested tori - negative curvature (prime topology) being the next big "thing"
the 1st 7x7 fractal closes the schizma - confirmed by DOR - like aligned coherent light amplification .
First 7x7 is from 10x10 grid of F numbers expressed as modulus 25 (25 mod 9 is 7)
see the "Phi_60_Fractal_7_-โฆ.jpg" earlier
lie8
Lie 8 group animations
I think the Lie 8 group may be the connection of Euclid to Mandelbrot.
If you are projecting a geometric figure not onto a flat plane but a tilted or warped plane it will alter the image. My question next would be is if you project onto a hypersphere? such as above or the Hopf Hyper Sphere .
Note the numbers in the sets appear to be on a very similar axis
Note the circular Lie 8 projecting on a multidimensional axis could easily create scale shifts and you would get the trails and self similar cells
Good convo with anon in general.
I am working on a math proof of some sort that concludes infinity=0 for any dimension. Would that help your cause in any way?
The only way I can think of that working is if all energy waves cancel out once all added together.
Multiverse
Last night dream of alternate timeline in a coma and could hear my daughter calling me back from a long distance. And realized the irregular tetrahedron in the gravity calculation connects to the other timelines by irregular tetrahedron in the time axis. The 10 degree shift from 90 to 80 shifts in time or imaginary dimension and supports the other timeline - and if repeated supports many.
colored with legend
opps forgot the black timeline Timeline Tensor
spun 3D should have drawn it 3D Black lines go 90 degrees to a new timeline Green triangle from Timeline 0 to other Timeline TL(X). Should be able to see tetrahedron better
The 3D irregular tetrahedron that I rotate in a simplier way to see it.
Quantum timeline wave will include all possible timelines and will collapse into one with the wave return of 100% - when the wave follows one timeline until the next timeline.
Tetrahedron Timeline Wave?
and then the 12 array into the Z axis
Gravity Tensor 45degree360 array.
for clockfag
ClockFags have brought me to time wave analysis.
interesting add music to the time wave analysis?
Everything is geometry.
I may not be smart enough to figure it out but someone will.
Gravity is geometry of warping of space/time, Mass is the geometry of the compression of space/time to create the illusion of mass.
Think of it as living on the surface of an irregular bubble and bubble being space/time and the warping irregularities are the mass time and energy events we perceive. The energy exists both inside and on the surface of the bubble but the space time and matter and all we perceive are just the on the irregular surface. The geometry of the irregular bubble is what seems to be all we study and we see side effects not cause.
CERN and the particle accelerators just smash energy together to compress the space time in a very unstable way that creates transient compression of space time that they view as particles. They study the particles but not the geometry of the compression of space time.
Nuclear reactions release stabilized compression of space time and thus much larger amounts of energy - it probably has something to do with a very small diameter and a very long tensor (like a very short long right triangle).
So what makes matter solid? What is hardness, how does it relate to surface tension. What role does temperature play?
EM wave pattern of a proton?
time to study the wave of matter
The larger the 'piece' of matter the shorter the wavelength. What happened to the wavelength? Is the wavelength still there buy viewed as short due to rotation into t i axis?
Strong Nuclear Force
The strong force acts between quarks. Unlike all other forces (electromagnetic, weak, and gravitational), the strong force does not diminish in strength with increasing distance between pairs of quarks. After a limiting distance (about the size of a hadron) has been reached, it remains at a strength of about 10,000 newtons (N), no matter how much farther the distance between the quarks.[5]
Fission
Typical fission events release about two hundred million eV (200 MeV) of energy, the equivalent of roughly >2 trillion Kelvin, for each fission event.
Size of Nucleus:
a helium atom has a size of about 1 ร ngstrรถm (0.1 nanometers or 10-10 meters), while its nucleus is only 1 femtometer (10-15 meters) in diameter.
10,000 Newton Meters to MeV= 62,415,064,799,632,000
then times 10X -15
So 62.415 MeV
That is not close to 200 MeV released
Where is all the energy coming from?
I messed this calculation up:
The size (diameter) of the nucleus is between 1.6 fm (10โ15 m) (for a proton in light hydrogen) to about 15 fm (for the heaviest atoms, such as uranium).
10,000/(15*10^-15)=.000000000000666 and that converts to 4.15684331565551 MeV.
and
200MeV converts to 0.0000000000320435 Newton meters.
There is an order difference of 4,800 times more energy in the fission reaction than the strong nuclear force.
I think I found my mistake the ratio is :
2.1362333333333333333333333333333 more energy in fission than strong nuclear force.
(I should have multiplied the size of nucleus not divided).
hoorah say Apex Orca !
6pts define wHERE, 7th current(s)
D45' Barron has a Good (deadly) Captain for a Father - he is a fortunate young Man: Note worthy like his Dad. . .
Emulate WHAT we need; condensate emanations in the (recursive) Field ;
Torsion physics isn't rocket science :)
2.1362333333333333333333333333333 more energy in fission than strong nuclear force.
Now lets see if the other forces make up that difference.
>>2684920 caduceus cascades; Dan Winter Bliss recordings.
Want Clipped Clifford-Orca Algebra with that?
wHAT say u?
Live Happy?
Symbiotic?
Should you wish; please Close the DOR on your way out - least it SLAMS SHUT.
>>2478279 I respect your ability to recall and share WHAT you see on the "other" side ;)
the DMT chopper occults much to most - but that's coming back around againโฆโฆ.
Mass is almost all a binding field
It isn't the particle that has the mass it is the field.
quantum chromodynamics binding energy (QCD binding energy), gluon binding energy or chromodynamic binding energy is the energy binding quarks together into hadrons. It is the energy of the field of the strong force, which is mediated by gluons.
Source of mass
Most of the mass of hadrons is actually QCD binding energy, through mass-energy equivalence. This phenomenon is related to chiral symmetry breaking. In the case of nucleons โ protons and neutrons โ QCD binding energy forms about 99% of the nucleon's mass. That is if assuming that the kinetic energy of the hadron's constituents, moving at near the speed of light, which contributes greatly to the hadron mass,[1] is part of QCD binding energy. For protons, the sum of the rest masses of the three valence quarks (two up quarks and one down quark) is approximately 9.4 MeV/c2, while the proton's total mass is about 938.3 MeV/c2. For neutrons, the sum of the rest masses of the three valence quarks (two down quarks and one up quark) is approximately 11.9 MeV/c2, while the neutron's total mass is about 939.6 MeV/c2. Considering that nearly all of the atom's mass is concentrated in the nucleons, this means that about 99% of the mass of everyday matter (baryonic matter) is, in fact, chromodynamic binding energy.
So most of the mass inside a nucleus is not matter it is energy.
Energy perceived as Mass.
Why would we perceive this energy as mass?
Geometry compression - is that what is perceived as mass?
Binding energy?
A field? Or a Tensor? Or a Tensor Field?
How would that work? The particles spinning around each other very fast. why would they be spinning - deviation of axis. The energy is being used to keep the vortex open that the particles are spinning about that 'binds' them. That is what I picture.
Wait the vortex is not vortex down - it is a vortex in to a zero point to a dimension 90 degrees. Think space time warped to a point like a black hole - that warping is the binding force. Each force we understand has a different topology of 4D warping to create a force.