>>21278156 (pb)

Google can't find the Crooks D.C. pings now.

Example Google search:Crooks phone ping "D.C."

https://www.google.com/search?q=Crooks+phone+ping+%22D.C.%22

You get no original reporting hits, and the first link is a dismissive, no-effort tweet. The tweet hid an important point: the association of the phone with both homeANDwork addresses of Crooks. It omitted the second association, which is "statistically significant", you could say.

He should have known that, very well. The guy tweets data analytics - and unoriginal Dem talking points - from the Munk School of Global Affairs at the University of Toronto.

He also refused to give a link to the original reporting. Not good.

And that's Google's #1 hit. Huh.

https://x.com/jsrailton/status/1815592241056158105

https://x.com/jsrailton

https://www.johnscottrailton.com/

https://x.com/munkschool

Most other top Google hits are nonsense - even a scan of the Federal Reporter from 1925. Come on…

So Google seems quite broken, on this particular query. That's…very curious, in itself, anon thinks.

https://x.com/OversightPR/status/1815446054428352591