Fake polls intensifying.
kek
Her satanic handlers are doing this.
She would have just eaten a plate of hamburgers.
Cult now claiming being a victim of insults after they themselves insulted millions and millions and millions of people all over the world.
FVCKCOMMUNISM
>restore reproductive rights
The right was never taken away. It's a right of state law, not federal law.
And it's not about reproductive rights of the mothers, it's about depopulation, fetus and baby trafficking, and funding election campaigns of Democrats.
It turned gay men straight
>I propose Supreme Court Justices be required to disclose gifts, refrain from public political activity, and recuse themselves from cases in which they or their spouses have conflicts of interest
>I propose
No, your handlers panicking about losing control are proposing.
The dumbass clowns gave the world "fake news", now they gave the world "weirdos".
(projection by the way, kek)
These people are stupid.
>Iran is innocent
That one journalists closest to Trump was asking rhetorical questions and making accusatory statements, all in a huff, then got angry when Q+ didn't play the game and didn't let those "questions" constrain his message. She really didn't like that because the goal of course was to experience a dopamine rush in getting acknowledgment for what is a "smear and slander smear and slander" series of "questions".
That's how you can tell the questions were statements and accusations and anger, it's the reaction to when the responder doesn't play along.
>"You have told four congresswomen of color…"
But that's not what Q+ did. He told fourindividuals.
That journalist was projecting her own racist logic by falsely labelling criticisms of individuals as criticisms of race.
The radical left does this all the time. They falsely label criticisms of individuals as "anti" that individual's race, when the critic was criticizing those individual's statements and actions, not the statements or actions of anyone else.
Very first "question" from the ABC fake news puppet was "You're a racist!"
…but that isn't a demonstration of how it is constitutional. Stroking one's own ego isn't a proof.
Massie: "Was Jack Smith nominated by the President?"
Garland: "No he was not"
Massie: "Was he confirmed by the Senate?"
Garland: "No he was not"
Massie: "When was his special counsel statute passed?"
Garland: "The statute expired"
That's an admission by Garland that Jack Smith's appointment was illegal and unconstitutional.
your own ego getting offended as it sees its messaging outshined by the messaging of other anon patterns, isn't pig's ego.
Talk about rent free.
America Winning.
kek
Relevant to new news with Garland's interview where he replied "I was a judge for 20 years, do I look like someone who would make that basic mistake?"
that's just your opinion.
>Iran and Hamas are innocent!