>>2147399

>At present, you plan to target the CIA and the FED, which, when fully mobilised amounts to hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of units, experienced in combat, deception, etc. From your strategic standpoint, a direct engagement with them at this time would not prove entirely effective.

I'm not advocating for direct armed conflict with CIA/FED and their minions. I'm talking about having those institutions shut down.

We need anons who have access to people who wield power and influence.

Start redpilling the top tier upper class and get them on our side.

As a country, we had historically always fought against the establishment of a central bank. Q mentions that the Cabal assassinated those members of the elite (Titanic, Hindenburg) who had been blocking the Federal Reserve Act.

We need to influence the movers and shakers.

People who can pick up the phone and call a Congressman directly. Plant seeds into their consciousness and push them to push for what is right.

>>2147399

>>2149225

Maybe anons should start a lobbying group.

Kek

How large are our actual numbers? What kind of influence could we wield as a collective? Economically and socially. Are there a few of us who have high positions and wield a certain degree of power already? How can we focus our collective power to affect the change we want and what, specifically is that change? That's why this board is here.

Who among us can help? In what ways can they help? How can we direct our efforts?

We need anons to get on the same page and start recruiting other anons to work toward a shared goal.

>>2149343

We've done the research, we've made the memes, now let's spread that message beyond social media. Let's organize it. Focus it. Utilize it in ways that can make real world changes.