>>21409297 YOU ARE HERE 🟢 Judges will decide any day if Trump vs Twitter is going back to trialNP
This case is addressing more than getting their profile back on twitter, its much more.
-
Challenging the constitutionality of Section 230 to immunize social media for violating the First Amendment of free speech. The case states that congress intentionally made the wording so vague, so social media with orders from politicians the leftists to order termination of the free speech they disagree with, conservatives, supporters, etc.
All gov agencies have used it to shut down any discussion ie covid, 2020 election. Basically the left controls social media by threatening to remove Section 230 if they don't do what they say.
The case is asking the court to rule, that Social Media has and never has had immunity for shutting down free speech.
And the court yo restore the first Amendment for all those who have lost the social media accounts to be restored.
Section 230 has to be redone to in detail so that this cannot be used by the left. The initial definition was to protect children on the internet, but because congress wrote it intentionally bad its morphed into an weapon against our constitutional rights.
Pretty interesting read, oh and it's a Class Action lawsuit and includes every American who lost a twitter (or social media) account when their free speech was deniedwith monetary restitution also!