sadly tons of images and videos and PDFs were lost (maybe someone grabbed them privately, but there's so much)
>BIBLICAL
biblical (adjective)
very great; on a very large scale.
"we need rainfall of biblical proportions to bring us back to normal"
yes, exactly.
that's why it makes no sense to pretend that Q is god or whatever.
I doubt Q wants to kill newborns as some kind of lesson, because to me that sounds evil, but that's just an opinion.
>you just gotta believe
>and if you die, you just didn't believe hard enough, like for example the children of Yemen that are bombed into pieces
>or maybe it was even a lesson to them not believing, or their parents not believing
>it's a loving god
also https://patents.google.com/patent/US10105389B1/en
>the Way
Of killing newborns as some kind of "lesson" or "revenge"?
Firstborn of Egypt (Exodus 12:29-30) - During the 10th plague, God kills all the firstborn sons in Egypt, including children. "There was loud wailing in Egypt, for there was not a house without someone dead."
Curse of Jericho's Rebuilt Walls (1 Kings 16:34) - God curses anyone who rebuilds Jericho's walls to bury their oldest and youngest sons under the rebuilt gates..
Abimelech's Atrocities (Judges 9:45-57) - After defeating Shechem, Abimelech has all the inhabitants killed, including women and children being burned alive in a tower, which the text attributes to God repaying Abimelech's violence.
Babylon's Judgement (Psalm 137:9, Isaiah 13:16) - As judgement, God sanctions the horrific act of Babylonian children being seized and dashed against rocks.
Death for Blasphemy (Leviticus 24:10-23) - A blasphemer's son is stoned to death by all Israel at God's command for the offense.
Massacre of Innocents (Matthew 2:16-18) - the Gospel portrays God as allowing Herod's slaughter of male infants in Bethlehem.
and this goes on and on and on
>"he" is a loving god
>child murder is okay, okay?
Doesn't "god" technically violate his own commandments? Or is "he" above da law?
don't forget
>omg, this is "biblical", we can't do anything against it, it's "His" wish, so we better obey and get us killed, like jesus
Mind control
Fear based of course
HELL
YOU ARE GOING TO HELL
AND YOUR CHILD WILL GET KILLED, BUT MY INVISIBLE FRIEND WANTS THAT, SO IT'S OKAY
So it's literally like the current "(in)justice" system.
Rules for thee, but none for meee
And that makes sense, because "his" commandments are full of me me me shit.
Almost as if "he" is a woman.
>because god can never be wrong
>that's wirtten in my book, and that book isn't the words of humans, but the ultimate "authority"
>SO IT'S OKAY TO MASS MURDER NEWBORNS
>when you kill newborns, it's a violation of le commandments
>but when I do it, it's fine because "god" said to me that it's okay to kill them all
Nice.
How did the newborns "fuck around" to deserve getting killed? Did they traffic children? Bomb Yemen? Fund it all by paying taxes? Or just by existing and being born to the "wrong" parents?
My opinion is: if you think it's okay to kill newborns, you are kinda evil.
>"it will no longer be enough to treat violence against women as 'simply' a criminal offense"
โฆbut it's fine to kill unborn females for some reason.
>a Jew
there are tons of infant genocide in your bible.
Conquest of Canaan (Deuteronomy 2:34, 3:6) - God commands the Israelites to "utterly destroy" multiple ethnic groups, including "man and woman, child and infant"
Massacre of Innocents (Matthew 2:16-18) - the Gospel portrays God as allowing Herod's slaughter of male infants in Bethlehem.
The prophet Hosea relays God saying "I will dash them to pieces" regarding the fate of Samaria's children (Hosea 13:16)
inb4
>but but that was just people saying something, those prophets are evil and liars
>my bible is truth though, not the words of evil liars
>you you are just cherry picking infant genocides
>just ignore these
>phew, now I can continue believing
Some claim
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q_source
If Q existed, physical copies of it have since been lost. Some scholars, however, believe it can be partially reconstructed by examining elements common to Matthew and Luke (but absent from Mark). Versions of this reconstructed Q do not describe the events of Jesus' life: Q does not mention Jesus' birth, his selection of the 12 disciples, his crucifixion, or the resurrection. Instead, it appears to be a collection of Jesus' sayings and quotations.
What a coincidence.
I will make it VERY VERY SIMPLE for you.
Genesis 19:24
>Then the Lord rained down burning sulfur on Sodom and Gomorrahโfrom the Lord out of the heavens.
Genesis 19:25
>Thus he overthrew those cities and the entire plain, destroying all those living in the citiesโand also the vegetation in the land.
inb4
>but but there was not a single child or newborn in those cities
>he's my loving invisible friend
inb4
>well that that doesn't count
Q means none of the supernatural BS was real, and Jesus (let's pretend he existed) was just a regular guy, but someone who went against authority.
And all of a sudden, it makes at least some sense.
>genociding cities is fine, there are no children in cities anywhere
your god sounds like some fucked up military, prolly NATO.
>you hate
I hate genociders, especially when genociding children.
>you cannot
So you are the free speech police?
>of god
which god?
how do you know that your god from your human written book is real?
what do you need a human written book for?
>ignores the simple fact that CHILDREN and NEWBORNS are living in cities and that his "loving" god murdered them all in cold blood
>if you don't believe in my god from this human written book, you must be this
Have you just violated one of "his" commandments?
>some newborns are JUST evil and we best murder them all, because my invisible friend told me to do that
sounds like you are evil to the core
you sound like one of these evil ones, who say that abortion is le bad, but when black children are murdered that that would be fine.
>I will murder newborns
>you attacked me, because you didn't believe in my invisible friend
>that makes it fine that I murder not only you, but also your children and whole family
you sound insane tbh.
well, yeah.
you make shit up about people, that's what you just did.
>you must be this, because you doubt about my totally loving genociding friend
that's made up shit, and a lie.
>self defense
>YOU DONT BELIEVE IN MY INVISIBLE FRIEND, that gives me the right to self defend myself and my belief
insane, tbh
also no, you would be going to jail, and in fact you may even get the death penalty, but I'm not sure if they give these out to mentally insane people.
>true
it's not true, you make shit up.
I COULD be a Buddhist.
Or maybe I don't need any pre-giving religion or any human written book of control.
You are telling lies, because it makes it easier for you.
No, I'm saying that you would get it for your "self defense" regarding someone simply not believing in a human written book.
Your self defense wouldn't be self defense, it would be plain murder.
>if a cuntry sends rockets, I can kill innocent children and newborns
Still no, still evil.
>I'm attacked
All I see in the past 50+ years that US is attacking other countries, so according to your opinion, it should be fine for tons of countries to genocide all Americans.
Would that be fine with you, or not?
It wouldn't fine with me either.
I'm also not okay with killing newborns of the Bush family.
Justice should be served to the ones responsible for wars, not to their children, unless they were involved as well.
Newborns are not involved.
If you think it's okay to murder them, because whatever nonsense, then you are evil.
End of story.
>with a grudge because their father was executed for high treason and genocide
If the grown up starts murdering people, thenโฆ
What happened to the children of Saddam Hussein?
Did they do that?
Or do you make shit up to defend your and your gods genocidal tendencies to murder newborns?
>Aspergerโs Syndrome named after a dude named Asperger.
>Aspergillus named after a holy water sprinkler.
>What a load of crap!
It's a funny for the evils.
"hurr we even named it accordingly, and these cattle can't figure it out hahaha"
And I kinda have to give it to them, it is kinda funny.
reminds me of this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buzz_Aldrin
Early life and education
Aldrin was born Edwin Eugene Aldrin Jr. on January 20, 1930, at Mountainside Hospital in Glen Ridge, New Jersey.[1] His parents, Edwin Eugene Aldrin Sr. and Marion Aldrin (nรฉe Moon)
I think it's all fake and gay and actors at best, or it's fully fake.
Also see the paper about isolation of Polio, where they literally write "highly infectious material" and then can't infect animals with it, even when injecting it into the brain.
https://www.tf1info.fr/justice-faits-divers/info-tf1-lci-le-fondateur-et-pdg-de-la-messagerie-cryptee-telegram-interpelle-en-france-2316072.html
Telegram messaging founder and CEO questioned in France
According to our information, the founder and CEO of the secure messaging service Telegram was arrested this Saturday evening at Le Bourget airport.
Pavel Durov, 39, Franco-Russian, was accompanied by his bodyguard and a woman.
Pavel Durov, founder and CEO of the encrypted messaging service Telegram, was arrested at around 8pm this Saturday evening as he stepped off his private jet on the tarmac at Le Bourget airport. The 39-year-old Franco-Russian was accompanied by his bodyguard and a woman.
The arrest was carried out by GTA (Gendarmerie des transports aรฉriens) gendarmes. Listed in the FPR (fichier des personnes recherchรฉes), Pavel Durov had just arrived from Azerbaijan. He had a French search warrant over his head, issued by OFMIN of the French National Criminal Investigation Department, on the basis of a preliminary investigation.