Anonymous ID: 5f7f90 July 13, 2018, 10:05 p.m. No.2150337   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0785 >>1020

thank you baker!

the anon from last bread is right, this is a court that doesn't have jursidiction on JA's case, but still a positive sign for JA to be free

from WL twatter:

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/1017591612178882560/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1017591612178882560&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.telesurtv.net%2Fenglish%2Fnews%2FInter-American-Court-Ruling-Benefits-Julian-Assange-20180713-0003.html

Anonymous ID: 5f7f90 July 13, 2018, 10:21 p.m. No.2150465   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0498

>>2150448

you're right about that

Huber can still prosecute, even if someone is not referred to by the IG/any other investigator

Huber is doing his own and separate investigation (even AWAN can be charged/investigated still)

Anonymous ID: 5f7f90 July 13, 2018, 10:24 p.m. No.2150488   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0518

>>2150464

the muh russia investigation!!!

their entire pretext (excuse) to start it was "they got information about Trump's campaign knowing the the russians had HRC's emails"

NOT ABOUT THE DNC/PEDOSTA'S

its logical that this would fall into the muh russia investigation because it served as the FALSE pretenses they started it under, which got the FISA warrant (along with the dossier) to start an ILLEGAL investigation

 

IMO, could be wrong

Anonymous ID: 5f7f90 July 13, 2018, 10:32 p.m. No.2150548   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0557 >>0582 >>0589 >>0605 >>0975

>>2150498

>>2150526

this is moar new than what we dug on actually:

 

The news of Imran Awan’s sweetheart plea deal emerged quietly during Fourth of July week, but it hasn’t gone unnoticed here, even with the predominant story right now being President Trump’s nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. My initial thought about the Awan deal was, “Oh, man, the DOJ has buried another scandal,” and many readers agreed, some commenting they were disgusted and even literally sickened by the outcome.

 

But one response offered an interesting take. Mind you, it involves giving Jeff Sessions the benefit of the doubt and picturing him as working steadfastly behind the scenes to ensure that justice is eventually done. Not easy, I know; it’s like being the kid who gets a pile of manure at Christmas and just KNOWS there has to be pony in there somewhere! But for the moment, let’s try to do that and take the ride with reader Bonnie Robinson.

 

“When you want to catch a fish, you use a smaller fish,” she reminds us. Of course, we already knew that’s been the strategy behind the treatment of Paul Manafort — were you aware he’s spending 23 out of every 24 hours in solitary confinement before he’s been tried, even though the only charge against him is unrelated to the “Russia” investigation and goes back many years? — to get cooperation against President Trump, but it applies here as well.

 

Awan was allowed to plead guilty to one measly charge of bank fraud when he could have been charged with much more: espionage, perhaps, or theft of government property, just for starters. I would note that he’s also alleged to have attempted to evade justice by hopping a plane to Pakistan. Robinson points out that since plea deals come as part of an agreement to cooperate with investigators, Awan has likely provided them with information relating to the Democrats who hired him. If she’s right, that means that for a deal as sweet as the one he got, he’s likely been singing like Pavarotti.

 

But Robinson goes on to address another aspect of this case: namely, how unlikely it is that an objective grand jury could be empaneled in Washington, D.C., for a case against congressional Democrats charged with something as serious as (perhaps) treason. The same would go for prosecutors and judges assigned to such a case. She reminds us that with all the evidence against the FBI presented in the IG report, the Inspector General left out that same part: the prosecution part. “Do you think this was going to be litigated in this setting?” she asks.

 

So, if it’s not going to be handled in D.C., where WILL it be handled? Robinson suggests that it’s moving from D.C. to Utah, under U.S. Attorney John Huber, who was selected by Attorney General Sessions to handle cases related to the IG report. Remarkably, Huber operates with a staff of 470 investigators, far exceeding the investigative power of a special counsel. One other possibility, if the cases relating to Awan include allegations of treason or other matters of national security, is that they will be tried in a military court, away from the media and the chance of compromising sensitive information, sources or methods. That lessens the likelihood that any “big fish” will get away on a technicality.

 

“Rest assured,” Robinson concludes, “this entire case is being handled with the utmost care.”

 

It’s hard to have confidence in that, especially when we’ve watched certain people skate for so long, but let’s hope she’s right. Sessions’ decision to call upon John Huber to team up with the IG and conduct a full-fledged criminal investigation in Utah, in the clean mountain air far from the stinky D.C. swamp, may turn out to be every bit as brilliant as top legal expert Jonathan Turley said it was in March.

 

https://stream.org/a-more-positive-take-on-the-awan-plea-deal/

Anonymous ID: 5f7f90 July 13, 2018, 10:40 p.m. No.2150601   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0608 >>0611 >>0635 >>0641 >>0838

>>2150582

well unicorns don't exist so we should be fine

/s

member anons, HUBER will become ]HUBER[

he's a silent killer, Mueller is a bull in a schina shop

notice you haven't heard much, at all actually, from Huber, but HE IS INVESTIGATING

you have to know the plan to trust the plan

Anonymous ID: 5f7f90 July 13, 2018, 10:45 p.m. No.2150641   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2150605

>>2150601

oh and huber has been investigating SINCE LAST FALL:

MYSTERY SURROUNDS

(old article, yet relevant to discussion):

 

Questions surround the work of U.S. Attorney John Huber, who is playing a key role in one of the multiple investigations surrounding President Trump and the Justice Department.

 

Known as a no-nonsense prosecutor whose primary experience is fighting violent crime, the U.S. attorney for Utah is an appointee of President Obama whose job was saved by Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) when Trump asked state attorneys to resign so that he could field a new slate of professionals.

 

Attorney General Jeff Sessions quietly tapped Huber — apparently last fall — to work in tandem with the Justice Department’s inspector general to determine whether conservative allegations of abuse at the FBI and the Justice Department merit investigation.

 

It’s an unusual arrangement, and one that fall short of demands from the right that Sessions name a second special counsel. That idea has generated controversy, with critics saying the second appointee would inevitably impede the work of special counsel Robert Mueller.

The administration has provided few public details about Huber’s assignment beyond a lengthy message from Sessions to Congress in which he argued that his appointment should be sufficient to address the concerns raised by GOP lawmakers.

 

The Justice Department has declined to comment on his budget or what Sessions meant when he said that Huber is working “in cooperation” with Inspector General Michael Horowitz. Horowitz’s office also declined to comment.

 

White House officials see Huber as a second special counsel in everything but name because he has the authority to prosecute, a task the inspector general has to refer to a U.S. attorney.

 

But outside the White House, there is less certainty about his role. Some of the more vocal conservative advocates of appointing a second special counsel aren’t mollified. One former senior Justice Department official called the appointment “window dressing … more aimed at placating Congress than anything else.”

 

Brett Tolman, who was the U.S. attorney for Utah prior to Huber and a former counsel in the Senate Judiciary Committee under Hatch, also said the appointment is “form over substance … to pacify those that might be clamoring for [a second special counsel].”

 

“If there’s a means to justify John Huber and it’s being touted as a special prosecutor, then why not appoint a special prosecutor? And if there’s not, then why not let the [inspector general] handle this, which is the traditional and historical avenue for dealing with investigation of DOJ and the FBI?” he said.

(too long)

 

reread the breitbart article Q has dropped multiple times, MUCH MOAR efficient

 

https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/381888-mystery-surrounds-sessions-appointee-to-fbi-investigation

 

https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/03/31/turley-sessions-using-utah-federal-prosecutor-much-better-trump-2nd-special-counsel/

Anonymous ID: 5f7f90 July 13, 2018, 10:52 p.m. No.2150690   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2150668

>>2150673

why did the spell her name wrong at first???

this woman has ties to soros and others

but at first we were skeptical about we were getting info on this name, but the press was spelling it slightly different

Anonymous ID: 5f7f90 July 13, 2018, 11:06 p.m. No.2150795   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0807

>>2150764

interdasting, I saw!

I've been really trying lately to stop fucking around with shills, still slip up sometimes

my post count is high as fuck this bread, but good talk about Huber, PS, and Awan… and a few about fucking around..

Anonymous ID: 5f7f90 July 13, 2018, 11:07 p.m. No.2150806   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0817

was digging on Huber news (barely any about his investigations) but found this, happy about POTUS' latest pardon:

 

SALT LAKE CITY (News4Utah) - Two different messages in two days are sending mixed signals to the public.

 

Monday, the U.S. Attorney was satisfied that William Keebler of Tooele got 25 months in jail for attempting to set a federal building on fire.

 

"We can have deeply held political beliefs and disagreements with the government," said John Huber, the U.S. attorney. "But we cannot then conspire and plan out criminal acts and intentions."

 

But Keebler was released from jail because he was credited with time served.

 

Tuesday, President Donald Trump issued a pardon on another case involving the federal government and an Oregon rancher and his son. The Hammonds were imprisoned for setting fires on federal lands. The president called it an "overreach" by the federal government.

 

A spokesperson from the U.S. Attorney's Office had no comment as to whether the pardon undermines the work of federal prosecutors. But others see the president as the one "overstepping."

 

"We think its outrageous," said Stephen Bloch, the legal counsel for the Souther Utah Wilderness Alliance. "The Hammonds were convicted by a jury, sentenced according to federal law and the actions by the president really throw up in the air the question of how much the rule of law applies on our federal lands."

 

In 2014, Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy was inspired by the Hammonds and staged his own standoff with the federal government. His charges were later dismissed.

 

Bundy is a member of the Independent American Party whose members in Utah praised the president.

 

"The constitution lays out, gives the president the ability to pardon citizenry when the courts get it wrong and frankly the courts of law got it wrong up in Oregon," said Jason Christensen.

 

San Juan County Commissioner Phil Lyman served 10-days in jail for leading an ATV protest ride on federal land. He says the pardons should be seen as a clear message.

 

"I was thrilled that President Trump has pardoned the Hammonds," Lyman said. "Maybe there really are some bad actors in the BLM and the Federal Bureau of Investigation that warrant a review of some of these convictions.

 

Lyman said his case is one of those. In fact, he acknowledged that others are pushing the white house to overturn his federal conviction.

there are some people who are working on that on my behalf," said Lyman.

 

"Mine was a political conviction witch hunt motivated by the environmentalist groups in collusion with the BLM."

 

But SUWA legal counsel Stephen Bloch said the rule of law applies to everyone. He used the case of Timothy DeChristopher as an example where the same BLM and the U.S. Attorney applied the same law to the environmental activist. DeChristopher was sentenced to 21 months in prison for offering bogus bids during a BLM oil and gas lease auction.

 

"I think it (pardon) calls into question whether people are going to be held into account when they don’t follow the law," Bloch said. "And it really seems like they’re playing favorites. The Hammonds, similar to the Bundys, similar to Phil Lyman in San Juan County were all people who flaunted federal law."

 

https://www.good4utah.com/news/presidential-pardon-involving-oregon-rancher-hits-close-to-home/1294571554

Anonymous ID: 5f7f90 July 13, 2018, 11:14 p.m. No.2150858   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0877

>>2150829

it only shows ~130 UIDs right now, but there are probably AT LEAST a few times that many lurking

not to mention 3 letter agencies, media organizations, and shareblue type organizations

don't give out your NAME AND EMAIL, for your own good!

 

welcome!