That's why circumstantial evidence is used in court to prove intent. Short of an outright statement made by the defendant admitting their intention to commit the act, it's all a prosecutor can do. It's normal. Those texts are a circumstantial evidence goldmine. However, similar to Comey reading the requirement of intent into Hillary acts, where intent is not an element due to it being strict liability, Horowitz thinks those texts indicate bias but are not legal proof of biased investigations. It's absurd that he concluded that.
Is Horowitz an Irish Catholic name?
It's like The Sneeches. The black hat cabal goes in one door and they walk out white hatted. It's magical.
Federal crimes must be prosecuted in the district in which they were committed.
The way to twist a witness is to go easier on the charges or sentencing recommendation, not let the fucker walk.
^^^This