probably coz you're mixing Q posts with spam
usual
carry on
tx anon, replied to you here:
>object to censorship
need to be more specific, please.
BO replies to normal inquiries. Will not reply to those he has replied to MANY times once concluding that it does no good.
Thank you for writing.
if you were posting in Japanese on the General thread, your post might have been mistaken for one of Vatican Shill's. He often changes languages, then spams anywhere from one to 20 posts.
the poster i'm responding to is a longtime shill from my perspective, well known to us. would not say "will not convo" to most anons.
If you want to welcome Japanese to QR, no problem. Please make sure welcome is both in Japanese and English - and keep it short so it's obvious that it's not VS spam.
HOWEVER - because of the split re Japanese perspective (why there are two separate threads), if you are directing posters to your thread, this may look like you are using General to win the advantage, whether or not that is the intention.
Do not know the best way to resolve this conflict, hope both factions can somehow reconcile. Wouldn't it be better to discuss differences on one or both of the Japanese threads?
>Didn't you say that to someone else?
Have often said to Doge on this thread and even banned him temporarily several times. Also said to DOAR shills after they asked the kinds of questions that are unending. Have CLOSED this thread sometimes when those kind of questions were the main kind posted. May happen again, who knows?
META is supposed to be a place to talk about board matters, especially about baking, notes, and digs. Some anons like to voice objections to our taking out spam and muh joos or similar and personal attacks on anons, including admins. Or using deleted-all-posts-in-this-thread for those who mix the former with more substantive posts. One tactic is to post spam (etc) and also Q posts (or something else of value), then to show up here complaining that Q is being deleted or that Q's tripcode is blocked.
That's all BS and they know it. No apologies for these policies.
there is no context for this
it's not a Q proof
could be a mistake
HOWEVER
but when you say "hundreds", makes me about 95% sure that there was a reason for the deletions
been doing this for almost 3 years and know for a fact we don't make many mistakes
would be rare not common to accidentally delete something.
if you are super concerned, enough to do some work, regularly keep a tab with the original thread and another with updated version
also make a copy of deletions along with the time they occurred (you'll have to mark that yourself, board log lacks precision)
circle the relevant time period, so we'll know which admin to talk to
then make an archive of both threads and the board log and post it here
that is the only way we can know what ELSE was posted by the same IP within the thread -
because when someone shills, ALL of their material may vanish within the thread - including neutral stuff
Admins very seldom delete regular posts by mistake and never on purpose
Unless the poster also has OTHER stuff that's not OK - like insults about Jim W, for instance. NO PERSONAL ATTACKS - can result in all posts deleted per thread.
Thought there might be a way to pin it down and wrote a reply to that effect but then realized it wouldn't prove anything
Suspect you may be same poster as above
most anons never have a problem with their posts being deleted, unless they are really spam (etc) or it looks a LOT like a shill post (same memes etc)
If this happened a lot, we'd be deluged with complaints, which - despite efforts to encourage anons to complain about "censorship," we are not.
You can accept this or not. Have pursued other such claims and so far NOT ONE TIME found bad deletes.
The guy who complains about censorship is ONE GUY who's been doing it since Spring. If you are not that guy, suggest you look carefully at what you're posting and check board rules to see if there is a problem (see Globals or Dough Resources thread).
was on regular server
>anon could post new QMap in here, and a BV or BO can then verify it and upload it to the thread.
great idea, ty for replying.
Am assuming this is from AutoArchiveAnon (TripleA) BV. He can add any updates posted here.