dChan
Anonymous ID: 032276 QR Meta: 9-24-2024 Sept. 23, 2024, 8:36 p.m. No.21647663   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Board Admin Central

Board open for questions, discussions & updates.

 

Previous META is now archived.

If it's necessary to close this thread, BO will always be reachable by email.

Doge is barred from posting here, having abused it previously.

 

The next year is critical for the patriot movement. Focus is on keeping QR open for business and shill activity down so we can effectively get out well-sauced info, anon digs & dank memes.

Thanks to all anons who dig, meme, pray, bake, take notes and BV.

o7

 

 

 

META thread archive now in Dough Resources:

>>20289059

 

 

Admin Email:

F4AL@protonmail.com.

 

Off-topic posts may be deleted at BO/BV discretion.

Anonymous ID: 032276 Sept. 23, 2024, 8:40 p.m. No.21647673   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0734 >>9321 >>4019 >>2320

Welcome to new Meta Thread

Here we are, less than two months away from the Nov 5, 2024 Presidential election.

TY to everyone for all ya'll have done and are doing to get the word out with truthful info, dank memes and steadying prayers.

God bless this country, this site, this board, this bread.

o7

Anonymous ID: 44f398 Sept. 28, 2024, 7:26 p.m. No.21676399   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>21675361

Isn't that an American product they sell

on the counters of grocery stores,

thought so.

Yeah the whole "you created all, you are

all." Hmโ€ฆ Don't even eat that garbage,

and it's still around

As a way of learning, I'd love to learn how that works.

Oh water should be free for all, it's a humanright, and electricity isn't really "produced", so that utility also should be free of charge. Every American and citizen of the world also is entitled to back pay; probably in a criminal case the utility company would be forced to pay severance as well.

Anonymous ID: 4efa4d Sept. 28, 2024, 9:39 p.m. No.21676881   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6914 >>0022

Ok, so I've got a question and I'd like some honest feedback on it.

 

I have been following along with Q right around 2 months before the 2020 election took place. I have placed a lot of trust in what I've seen posted and proofs that I've also witnessed over the last 4 years. Well, here we are, about a month before what we all believe is going to be a massive change to our world in general.

 

I watched Trump's rally again and again where he was shot in the ear and some things just continued to cause me to scratch me head. So, I searched for some videos on the topic over on Bitchute (https://www.bitchute.com/video/srBPRGM3YkrQ) and to my surprise there are a few that break down Trumps assassination attempt as being setup.

 

Now, I know that two things can be true at the same time, and I immediately think about posts that state POTUS is 100% insulated. So, if that were to be true, then there is no way that bullet came within a few millimeters of his skull.

 

I also realize there are posts referring to enjoying the show and how things are done in Hollywood. I would understand that considering we are "at war" with China in the cyber realm that POTUS has war time powers and I guess he can do what is necessary to get the results needed.

 

It's just a little shocking to me at this moment finding that the assassination attempt is more than likely staged. Does anyone have any posts that may point back to this that just weren't understood yet for this situation?

Anonymous ID: 3d3d64 Sept. 28, 2024, 9:49 p.m. No.21676914   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>21676881

Honestly I haven't seen very much video due to time constraints. I'd suggest looking at that new bread made just to deal with the assassination attempt and see if there's something in there that might help you out

Best of Luck anon

Anonymous ID: 4c4d10 Sept. 29, 2024, 8:07 a.m. No.21678571   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8869 >>0048

>>21673425

I think that because this is an ANONYMOUS environment, we can talk about potential problems and their behavior without harming the other person as much as possible.

If we can't do that, and can't clarify the problem, isn't there a possibility of a new problem arising next?

Anonymous ID: 4c4d10 Sept. 29, 2024, 8:19 a.m. No.21678625   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8869 >>0048

>>21673425

This is a Japanese perspective, but I would like to welcome more Japanese here in QR.

I would like to welcome more Japanese here in QR, and I would like to see more people come to 8kun.

I think it is the fastest speed of awakening.

That is why, among the problems I see today, I believe that Japan's anon divisive wars have turned away many of the movement's participants.

 

One of them is to avoid looking at issues and dissenting opinions, and some even attack those who advocate dissenting opinions en masse.

And if they occur outside of 8kun, they will identify individuals and distribute their mugshots to measure their attacks.

Opinions on issues are erased.

 

Now cannot even discuss how to improve the problem.

I believe that this space is an environment where we can talk about improving the problem as much as possible without harming the individual's existence.

And isn't it meaningful to discuss better ways to address this movement?

Anonymous ID: c5cb44 Sept. 29, 2024, 9:40 a.m. No.21678869   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9267

>>21678550

>>21678571

>>21678625

^me

This is not posted to discredit BO.

 

I also believe that there is a necessary deletion to look at the air and public morals in QR.

 

I think I understand them.

That is why I would like to ask for an explanation as to why they were erased.

I also thought that this explanation would be an opportunity to hear BO's criteria and thoughts.

I also believe that the comfort of the Japanese threads is due to the presence of BO & BV & Anon & Bakers.

 

I am truly looking for the best choice.

Sorry for the multiple posts and the long post.

No offense.

 

P.S.

ID change

Did you notice anything different?

 

deleted post No.

21663787

21663571

216635

07

Anonymous ID: c5cb44 Sept. 29, 2024, 11:19 a.m. No.21679267   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9579

>>21678869 edit

I think I understand.

 

>>21679176 not me

>"I object to censorship on QR."

^This

It is easy to simply say that censorship is wrong.

 

This is a free space, right?

Then isn't it important to clearly communicate which free choices create inconvenience?

 

My question to the current BO is why was my post deleted?

&What is the problem?

I post here because I think it is important to clarify these things.

Wouldn't clarifying things help us find the best remedies?

Anonymous ID: c5cb44 Sept. 29, 2024, 1:15 p.m. No.21680018   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0113

>>21679579

> BO will not reply, as he stated.

Didn't you say that to someone else?

Not a little, though I have not been told that way,,,

Thanks,

It's okay.

No problem.

I think it makes sense to speak up.

I do not force those who cannot speak to speak.

 

But that does not mean that do not say what feel is wrong.

 

Or, it does not mean that do not ask questions that have doubts about.

 

The other issue that will come up is that the deletion of my post combined with one of someone else's will create a story.

 

Or they may be identified with someone who behaved radically somewhere else.

 

That's why I'm making this statement here.

 

In some cases, characters are coordinated without their knowledge and without permission.

 

It's like Smith in MATRIX.

Smith Coordination tactic๏ผŸ

 

Well, you might say this.

It's your fault for speaking up,

So they coordinate.

Now which is worse?

Or which is the problem?

 

If you have a problem with a post or a statement, why don't you just point out that there is a problem?

 

Another Perspective

Some of them even call them ignorant without giving them access to a lot of information.

Well, this strategy may be possible, but I don't think this is the best way.

 

Isn't that why communication in an anonymous environment is so important?

 

I think it also protects the anonymous system individual.

 

'Restoring Power to the People'

The first step in restoring power to the people is for them to have access to a wealth of information and the opportunity to speak freely.

And is this the best situation now?

I wonder if we can make it even better.

Anonymous ID: 30a87b Sept. 29, 2024, 1:19 p.m. No.21680048   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0180 >>2356

>>21678550

Thank you for writing.

 

if you were posting in Japanese on the General thread, your post might have been mistaken for one of Vatican Shill's. He often changes languages, then spams anywhere from one to 20 posts.

 

>>21678571

the poster i'm responding to is a longtime shill from my perspective, well known to us. would not say "will not convo" to most anons.

 

>>21678625

If you want to welcome Japanese to QR, no problem. Please make sure welcome is both in Japanese and English - and keep it short so it's obvious that it's not VS spam.

HOWEVER - because of the split re Japanese perspective (why there are two separate threads), if you are directing posters to your thread, this may look like you are using General to win the advantage, whether or not that is the intention.

Do not know the best way to resolve this conflict, hope both factions can somehow reconcile. Wouldn't it be better to discuss differences on one or both of the Japanese threads?

Anonymous ID: 30a87b Sept. 29, 2024, 1:33 p.m. No.21680113   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0180

>>21680018

>Didn't you say that to someone else?

Have often said to Doge on this thread and even banned him temporarily several times. Also said to DOAR shills after they asked the kinds of questions that are unending. Have CLOSED this thread sometimes when those kind of questions were the main kind posted. May happen again, who knows?

 

META is supposed to be a place to talk about board matters, especially about baking, notes, and digs. Some anons like to voice objections to our taking out spam and muh joos or similar and personal attacks on anons, including admins. Or using deleted-all-posts-in-this-thread for those who mix the former with more substantive posts. One tactic is to post spam (etc) and also Q posts (or something else of value), then to show up here complaining that Q is being deleted or that Q's tripcode is blocked.

That's all BS and they know it. No apologies for these policies.

Anonymous ID: c5cb44 Sept. 29, 2024, 1:50 p.m. No.21680180   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>21680113

>Didn't you say that to someone else?

Sorry, this is my misrepresentation to be exact,

 

I wanted to say that I was not told that the BO would not respond to me.

 

>>21680048

Thank you for taking the time to reply.

Understood.

 

I'll think about it once.

I'm basically too busy with my own research to come up with words to dialogue,

If any words/questions (even harsh words) etc. come up at all, I will speak.

This time I had the very opportunity to do so, butโ€ฆ,

 

Where I thought there might be an opportunity for dialogue, I did self-accountability because the post was erased.

 

Dialogue is about this movement.

Therefore, some of my questions are scathing.

 

No more problems.

Thank you for taking the time to see us.

And, Ty, always.

o7

Anonymous ID: 30a87b Sept. 29, 2024, 5:15 p.m. No.21681059   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>21680427

there is no context for this

it's not a Q proof

could be a mistake

HOWEVER

but when you say "hundreds", makes me about 95% sure that there was a reason for the deletions

been doing this for almost 3 years and know for a fact we don't make many mistakes

would be rare not common to accidentally delete something.

 

if you are super concerned, enough to do some work, regularly keep a tab with the original thread and another with updated version

also make a copy of deletions along with the time they occurred (you'll have to mark that yourself, board log lacks precision)

circle the relevant time period, so we'll know which admin to talk to

then make an archive of both threads and the board log and post it here

that is the only way we can know what ELSE was posted by the same IP within the thread -

because when someone shills, ALL of their material may vanish within the thread - including neutral stuff

Anonymous ID: 30a87b Sept. 29, 2024, 5:32 p.m. No.21681137   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1305

>>21680427

Admins very seldom delete regular posts by mistake and never on purpose

Unless the poster also has OTHER stuff that's not OK - like insults about Jim W, for instance. NO PERSONAL ATTACKS - can result in all posts deleted per thread.

Thought there might be a way to pin it down and wrote a reply to that effect but then realized it wouldn't prove anything

Suspect you may be same poster as above

most anons never have a problem with their posts being deleted, unless they are really spam (etc) or it looks a LOT like a shill post (same memes etc)

If this happened a lot, we'd be deluged with complaints, which - despite efforts to encourage anons to complain about "censorship," we are not.

You can accept this or not. Have pursued other such claims and so far NOT ONE TIME found bad deletes.

The guy who complains about censorship is ONE GUY who's been doing it since Spring. If you are not that guy, suggest you look carefully at what you're posting and check board rules to see if there is a problem (see Globals or Dough Resources thread).

Anonymous ID: c5cb44 Sept. 30, 2024, 12:47 a.m. No.21682492   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2494 >>2497 >>2573

>>21682466

Oh, let me ask you something,

I'm trying to tell you in as roundabout a way as possible what I think is strange,

The reason for this is that I think it would be very damaging to directly tell someone, for example, who is active in a face to face manner, that something is not right.

That's why I try to tell them in a roundabout way.

 

Sometimes I think it is meaningless to tell others what is right or wrong in the first place.

 

but I do think that disagreeing and pointing out problems can prevent new problems from arising and lead to improvements.

I've been angry and hurt more than a few times when I've been abused here on QR, but that's also why I feel the importance of the opinions here.

 

Wasn't this place where you choose what you want to see and what you don't want to see in the first place?

I don't think it's a good idea to expose individuals so openly, but I do think that pointing out problems and opinions in an articulate way can help to clarify problems and prevent further problems from arising.

I know that my post may have been a bit harsh in some cases, but if it is correct, I think you can stand up for it, and if it is out of context, you can just ignore it.

 

I posted this post because I would like to get BO's thoughts and opinions on the subject.

No offense.

Anonymous ID: 241d90 Sept. 30, 2024, 2 a.m. No.21682573   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2604

>>21682492

Not 100% sure I know what you're asking, but BV who watches the international threads informed me of a request to have certain posts removed from QAFJ thread, i think they were removed but don't know the details. (I thought they were on General when reply above.) If this is the situation, then it would appear that those who run that thread were not receptive to whatever was posted.

In any case, my general reply to the question about how to resolve a difference of opinion is this: nobody can force someone else to change their mind once it is firmly set. You can try but it is difficult. You think your ideas are correct; they think theirs are correct.

To reconcile requires finding something about which both sides can agree and using that as a starting point for discussion. This is assuming the both are motivated to reconcile.

 

Good luck and Godspeed,

o7

Anonymous ID: ef9b11 Oct. 1, 2024, 10:12 a.m. No.21689299   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>21682466

Just as a side note. You say "Frequent flyers are obviously recognized over time." This is true, but as core anons, we have been here over a longer period of time than you, and it is you and your team players who are recognized by us, not the other way around.

Anonymous ID: 4de211 Oct. 1, 2024, 2:38 p.m. No.21690931   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1811 >>1823 >>1918 >>2331

>>21690706

To further clarify, why don't you do it first?

Wouldn't that be more constructive as well as on the record?

 

Don't you think if you could present that wonderful technology to the BO for comparison and review, it would facilitate time rather than you lamenting here?

 

If you don't have the skills to do that then you'll just have to take a different approach, won't you?

In that case you would have to show that your logic is valid.

 

Of course, what arises here is a difference in perception and perspective on validity.

 

And what can be done if even at this point it is difficult to understand each other?

Send spam with the exact same story?

Update the logic?

Or?

Anonymous ID: 5cae5a Oct. 1, 2024, 4:40 p.m. No.21691762   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4892 >>3553 >>5585

>>21690706

No one can update it because the entire thread is locked with "placeholders" filling it. Do you understand? The threads are locked, and no one can update them Except Board Owner.

 

And it's been almost FOUR YEARS. Unacceptable.

 

We can all update them on our own, but the Only one who can actually update the Thread on this Board is Board Owner.

 

It's sad and highly illogical.

Anonymous ID: 5cae5a Oct. 1, 2024, 4:44 p.m. No.21691797   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4892

>>21690726

Here's the thing. We as Q researchers want a) the information Q said to keep updated, to stay updated (such as the resignation list, which hasn't been updated in over a year), and b) no censorship.

 

There is simply no excuse for the QR Board Owner to not add Q's last posts to the Graphic Threadโ€ฆ for YEARS. Let that sink in. And then the Board Team censors those who question the irrational behavior.

Anonymous ID: 5cae5a Oct. 1, 2024, 4:58 p.m. No.21691918   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2331 >>2621 >>4019 >>4197

>>21690931

Here, look at the picture, see the Locked Thread for the Map and Proofs. Facts matter. Find the facts first, then decide.

 

This map was abandoned by people who abandoned Q, clearly. And those people are censoring the ones of us who inquire. If the Board Owner cannot be bothered to do the basics Q required - keep the resignation list updated, keep the graphic updated - then the Board Owner should immediately release the Board to someone who will. Neglect by design is the most logical explanation, and it's unacceptable here.

Anonymous ID: 306065 Oct. 1, 2024, 6:03 p.m. No.21692331   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2397

>>21690931 ID change.

 

>>21691918

yeah

I guess only a limited number of people can edit where it's locked.

 

Did you do that graphic update yourself?

If it's locked, why don't you make a thread to do it, and if the thread was deleted, why don't you do it in your own catalog?

 

That would clarify the obvious issue, wouldn't it?

 

This map was abandoned by people who abandoned Q, clearly.

^Facts matter๏ผŸ

 

If there is an action you think is necessary for Q, then do it.

If you can do it, so be it.

 

Of course, I am also against censorship.

Anonymous ID: 306065 Oct. 1, 2024, 6:10 p.m. No.21692397   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2621

>>21692331

>This map was abandoned by people who abandoned Q, clearly.

^Facts matter๏ผŸ

This means you think so, doesn't it?

The fact that it is your opinion?

 

Why don't you do it before you say it?

It's a job you found, and if you do it, don't you think you will have contributed to it?

 

If you do something that you think is justified and you are interrupted, don't you say something then?

That seems more logical to me.

Anonymous ID: 306065 Oct. 1, 2024, 6:28 p.m. No.21692621   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2862 >>2938

>>21691918

>>21692397

Now the question.

Why do you need to lament here when there are things you could be doing right now?

 

I am thinking about maximizing and besting this movement as soon as possible.

In this context, I see an opportunity to promote the movement by expressing my opinion on statements such as yours.

Anonymous ID: ab350d Oct. 1, 2024, 10 p.m. No.21694397   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>21694226 add.

It seems to be a bit repetitive.

 

Don't you think things would go faster if you worked to solve what you think is the problem first?

 

This time your claim is to update the GRAPHIC.

 

In this case, if you bring the updated GRAPHIC, there is no need to ask for this.

 

Rather, I can pinpoint what you want.

 

And if they deny it here, then the problem becomes clear and improvements can be found.

If there is a problem on the side of the denial, that will be revealed as well.

 

It may also further clarify what is right and what is wrong.

 

I think that dialogue to solve critical problems leads to new possibilities.

 

But obviously some things never reach the level of dialogue.

^This may involve individual perspectives and ideologies.

 

But I suspect that when you accomplish something, if it is justified or constructive, it creates an opportunity for someone else to derive further truth.

Anonymous ID: 744556 Oct. 2, 2024, 12:25 a.m. No.21694875   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4894

>>21689294

anon, i don't know what you have. we do not censor individuals. we do have board content guidelines, might on rare occasions accidentally take out things by mistake, but very rarely. and are usually aware of it pdq.

>>21689321

that is an archived thread. Will ask BV who archives it to take a look at your request.

Anonymous ID: 5412f5 Oct. 2, 2024, 12:33 a.m. No.21694895   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4903 >>4925

>>21694851

I see this thread as a critical part of what weโ€™ve been learning from Q. For those of us whoโ€™ve been paying attention, Q has been guiding us to look deeper, question the mainstream narrative, and stand up for whatโ€™s right. This thread is an extension of that missionโ€”itโ€™s a place where patriots can come together, ask questions, and share knowledge that the establishment doesnโ€™t want us to know.

 

Q has repeatedly told us that the system is rigged against the average person, especially against those who value faith, freedom, and independence. Whether itโ€™s in business, politics, or our everyday lives, we see the elites tightening their grip. This thread gives us a space to not only discuss these issues but to figure out how we can fight back. Just like Q advised, we need to stay informed, build strong networks, and work together to expose the truth and resist the forces that seek to control us.

 

Itโ€™s more than just a place for business inquiries, itโ€™s a hub for patriots who are awake to whatโ€™s really happening. By supporting one another and sharing strategies, weโ€™re taking steps to break free from the establishmentโ€™s influence. Just like Q has told us from the beginning: โ€œWhere we go one, we go all.โ€ This thread is part of that journey, a place where we gather to ensure weโ€™re prepared for whatโ€™s ahead.

Anonymous ID: 6048ef Oct. 2, 2024, 12:58 a.m. No.21694956   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4966

>>21694934

I disagree with this anon, the business inquires thread is by NO MEANS a "shitposting thread", it's where we fight the establishment attacking our businesses and correlate it to Q's advice. As a business owner they tried to shove DEI crap into my business, they forced me to have a code of conduct, they are doing everything they can to keep the entire space to themselves, and luckily the other anons in that thread have shared wonderful advice with me after inquiring them. I think this thread is of great interest to many Q patriots given its relevancy to the subject of the board.

Anonymous ID: 744556 Oct. 2, 2024, 1:13 a.m. No.21695004   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>21694993

If you make a thread on /comms, it will be safe. Won't be locked or deleted - if you look, you'll see there are threads from years ago there. Please transfer anything you'd like to keep and/or make an archive thread for what you've already posted here on /qresearch.

Anonymous ID: 744556 Oct. 2, 2024, 1:36 a.m. No.21695046   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>21694993

>>21694993

checked out /comms to see how it's going, there's another new thread there - WATN (we are the news), focused on news gathering. Perhaps that would be of interest to you. Have asked BVs to hold off on deleting your thread for a day, plz set up on /comms soon.

Anonymous ID: 649aee Oct. 7, 2024, 12:45 a.m. No.21723553   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3558

>>21691762

>with "placeholders"

 

the "placeholders" are obviously there, because QMap and QProofs threads were combined, because "anons" complained that there were so many sticky threads.

 

And of course anons can't edit posts, so for QMap, which comes first, anons can't add images, because to do so they would have to edit posts.

Anonymous ID: 649aee Oct. 7, 2024, 1:04 a.m. No.21723558   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3560 >>5585

>>21723553

re; QNao; and anon could post new QMap in here, and a BV or BO can then verify it and upload it to the thread.

 

One could do the same for QProofs, because if that thread is opened, the CP spam bot will post into that thread, and I don't know if other spammers will spam that thread too. That was the reason why it was originally locked.

 

For QProofs at least the 6:11 gun shot QProof could be uploaded. I don't know if there are any more definitive ones.

Anonymous ID: 649aee Oct. 7, 2024, 1:06 a.m. No.21723560   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>21723558

please keep in mind that that thread is mirror'd on >>>/qnotables/ and on >>>/qnotables/ it's 2 threads, which have to get updated too.

 

Those won't get unlocked in any case, because qnotables is locked down.

 

QProofs:

https://8kun.top/qnotables/res/219.html

QMap

https://8kun.top/qnotables/res/184.html