You've come full circle.
I said if that doesn't work, you'll make it.
I'd say it's more about what happens from there.
Which is simpler?
Because wouldn't that make the issue more obvious?
>>21694169 edit
~~I said if that doesn't work, you'll make it.~~
I said it's better to do it yourself before asking someone else to do it.
If you think the deed is constructive.
>>21694226 add.
It seems to be a bit repetitive.
Don't you think things would go faster if you worked to solve what you think is the problem first?
This time your claim is to update the GRAPHIC.
In this case, if you bring the updated GRAPHIC, there is no need to ask for this.
Rather, I can pinpoint what you want.
And if they deny it here, then the problem becomes clear and improvements can be found.
If there is a problem on the side of the denial, that will be revealed as well.
It may also further clarify what is right and what is wrong.
I think that dialogue to solve critical problems leads to new possibilities.
But obviously some things never reach the level of dialogue.
^This may involve individual perspectives and ideologies.
But I suspect that when you accomplish something, if it is justified or constructive, it creates an opportunity for someone else to derive further truth.