>>21678550

>>21678571

>>21678625

^me

This is not posted to discredit BO.

I also believe that there is a necessary deletion to look at the air and public morals in QR.

I think I understand them.

That is why I would like to ask for an explanation as to why they were erased.

I also thought that this explanation would be an opportunity to hear BO's criteria and thoughts.

I also believe that the comfort of the Japanese threads is due to the presence of BO & BV & Anon & Bakers.

I am truly looking for the best choice.

Sorry for the multiple posts and the long post.

No offense.

P.S.

ID change

Did you notice anything different?

deleted post No.

21663787

21663571

216635

07

>>21678869 edit

I think I understand.

>>21679176 not me

>"I object to censorship on QR."

^This

It is easy to simply say that censorship is wrong.

This is a free space, right?

Then isn't it important to clearly communicate which free choices create inconvenience?

My question to the current BO is why was my post deleted?

&What is the problem?

I post here because I think it is important to clarify these things.

Wouldn't clarifying things help us find the best remedies?

>>21679579

> BO will not reply, as he stated.

Didn't you say that to someone else?

Not a little, though I have not been told that way,,,

Thanks,

It's okay.

No problem.

I think it makes sense to speak up.

I do not force those who cannot speak to speak.

But that does not mean that do not say what feel is wrong.

Or, it does not mean that do not ask questions that have doubts about.

The other issue that will come up is that the deletion of my post combined with one of someone else's will create a story.

Or they may be identified with someone who behaved radically somewhere else.

That's why I'm making this statement here.

In some cases, characters are coordinated without their knowledge and without permission.

It's like Smith in MATRIX.

Smith Coordination tactic？

Well, you might say this.

It's your fault for speaking up,

So they coordinate.

Now which is worse?

Or which is the problem?

If you have a problem with a post or a statement, why don't you just point out that there is a problem?

Another Perspective

Some of them even call them ignorant without giving them access to a lot of information.

Well, this strategy may be possible, but I don't think this is the best way.

Isn't that why communication in an anonymous environment is so important?

I think it also protects the anonymous system individual.

'Restoring Power to the People'

The first step in restoring power to the people is for them to have access to a wealth of information and the opportunity to speak freely.

And is this the best situation now?

I wonder if we can make it even better.

>>21680113

>Didn't you say that to someone else?

Sorry, this is my misrepresentation to be exact,

I wanted to say that I was not told that the BO would not respond to me.

>>21680048

Thank you for taking the time to reply.

Understood.

I'll think about it once.

I'm basically too busy with my own research to come up with words to dialogue,

If any words/questions (even harsh words) etc. come up at all, I will speak.

This time I had the very opportunity to do so, but…,

Where I thought there might be an opportunity for dialogue, I did self-accountability because the post was erased.

Dialogue is about this movement.

Therefore, some of my questions are scathing.

No more problems.

Thank you for taking the time to see us.

And, Ty, always.

o7

>>21680427

Wow what a coincidence!

Just the thing to pique my interest!

Now the question.

Is this an assertion that you are one of those 10?

Why didn't you post it using the tripcode?

Wouldn't that be a more reliable way of confirming Q?

>>21680427

I know you have posted this a few times, have you not?

Then why don't you post another new and further proof before you post the same thing?

I would rather see that!

>>21680669

That means more like 10 seconds +/-, which is closer to the number of posts!

Let's say once 10 seconds +/- is determined by the TRIP code,

What do you do after that?

Logical question that comes at this moment So what?

>>21680658

>>21680669

>>21680695

Oops, my bad, I got a little too inquisitive!

The subject was about censorship, wasn't it?

bye

>>21682466

Oh, let me ask you something,

I'm trying to tell you in as roundabout a way as possible what I think is strange,

The reason for this is that I think it would be very damaging to directly tell someone, for example, who is active in a face to face manner, that something is not right.

That's why I try to tell them in a roundabout way.

Sometimes I think it is meaningless to tell others what is right or wrong in the first place.

but I do think that disagreeing and pointing out problems can prevent new problems from arising and lead to improvements.

I've been angry and hurt more than a few times when I've been abused here on QR, but that's also why I feel the importance of the opinions here.

Wasn't this place where you choose what you want to see and what you don't want to see in the first place?

I don't think it's a good idea to expose individuals so openly, but I do think that pointing out problems and opinions in an articulate way can help to clarify problems and prevent further problems from arising.

I know that my post may have been a bit harsh in some cases, but if it is correct, I think you can stand up for it, and if it is out of context, you can just ignore it.

I posted this post because I would like to get BO's thoughts and opinions on the subject.

No offense.

>>21682492

Excuse me for the sidebar.

>>21682492

Add.

I think Line of Fire is something that inevitably happens in this free speech space.

>>21682573

Thank you for taking the time to visit with.

God bless you too.

o7