>>22981534

>Is it possible that we are not creators?

I think that everyone has the capacity to be a creator.

>Is it more that we have to use what is available to give?

Is that your talk about the breadth of your vision?

At what point does it become new?

For example, if an existing item is updated, does it become new?

If an existing object changes to something else during an update, does that make it new?

If I missed something that was already there in the past and I check it in the present, does that make it new?

Or, if you are asking about something else, I think there is an order to things.

And I would like that.

I don't know what the people here at QResearch think, but I hope that this QResearch will be attended by the whole world.

I hope that bakers like the General will always be there, that bread will be baked, and that more information will flow.

>>22981254 ID change

>>22981620

>I hope that this QResearch will be attended by the whole world.

Let me rephrase that a bit.

I hope the whole world will join this catalog.

And I hope that it will be used as an environment for outputting the inputs from this movement.

Of course, there may be cases where a submission to Q Research is deemed inappropriate.

Then I think you should change your method or create your own catalog.

I think it is better to be able to output what I have inputted.

>>22981620 edit.

~~order~~

> sequence

add.

>Then I think you should change your method or create your own catalog.

Even if you could make it, as far as I can see it would be very hard to keep posting.

And if I can't, I'll come back here to Q Research.

Well, I think it is good that there are more contributions here.

>>22981691 edit.

~~contributions~~

> post.