No, it isn't. A guy alleging another guy is sending him word documents is not a witness and does not have evidence. A person making allegations against someone else is a witness. There is no witness. This isn't even hearsay, it is alleged hearsay without documentary evidence of hearing anything. I can take all of his evidence, insert any name and claim I talked to someone. I can also send messages to Harris claiming anything I want, that doesn't make it true. We all know Tim looks like a pedo. We all know that taking children to concerts by themselves is INAPPROPRIATE for a teacher. And we can all assume that trafficking foreign children or children to foreign nations should be scrutinized, but this "INSURRECTIONIST" allegations should be seen as infiltrating bullshit unless he produces a live witness under oath. Walz won't sue him for libel though, because Walz probably hired him in the first place.