>21856437
No it's you and who you work for.
I see they're in MuhJoo rather than mimic mode. Or is the former mimic mode as well. An IRL mimic mode and they confess through projection perhaps.
>You anons are miserable deplorable fokkers
I prefer to think of myself as an abrasive optimist. In a pleasant sort of way. But it's an acquired taste.
>21856611
No, but coming here a person gets to spend all day with paid posting clowns running a divide and conquer narrative using ethnicity/religion as the focus. I have to filter you now, and seeing as you idiots are focused on that you'll be too busy to mimic.
Have you clowns even defined what a "famefag" is or is that just something you try to smear someone with for your isolate and polarize attempts?
Because, uh, all I see who they call that here are the people that challenge the narrative they post. Are they really that arrogant in their complacent decadence to think that anyone that would dare to challenge them must be looking for fame and thus why they use that term? I call them failfags because after the past year and three quarters they failed to destroy me like they claimed they would, and they love to whine that I bring nothing to the board when both light and dark use what I post here in some form.
>Yeah, a famefag is a faggot who creates a recognisable persona that carries over from bread to bread and is anathema to anonymous messgae culture.
>and is anathema to anonymous message culture
Says who? Who made you the arbiter of "anonymous message culture?"
>It is for this reason that you are universally despised as being even lower than the belly of a double crossing snake slithering through the grass.
Universally? So, you speak for everyone? You only speak for yourself here so the disdain in that sentence is your own and cannot possibly be everyone else's.
>Tell me, which one is the bottom, you or pig?
Remember when I used to use that one on you?
>I'd go with you.
I like women, blondes preferably, not faggots like you.
>Anon did not start anon message boards and thus cannot claim any responsibility for the rise of said culture, but anon can surely adhere to it,
So you're trying to force a 100 Monkeys Scenario on me because that's what you want? Is that about it? So, why do the clown personas get a free pass from you? You know, the ones I go after. It's only the person that goes after them that's the problem, huh? Don't battle their ideas in a sphere of ideas where we're supposed to do battle, huh? And the dumb deflection of the first time bullshit after you've been running that act all year doesn't fly either. See, your "persona" has carried over bread to bread too. Why are you exempt, attacking a patriot on the line rather than the shills that patriot is against? Don't worry, I'll wait. Throw it into an AI to answer it for you if you prefer.
False flag or actual nutjob?