LB >On Avg we run 150 UIDS
>There is always spam
>Today we are running 125 UIDS and no spam
>25 UIDS are spamers confirmed
may have 2-3 still hanging around atm
think the forces have been called to the voter polls
DASTING>>>
>Virginia
Deals or NO DEALS?
That is the Question.
We. The. People. DEMAND. NO. DEALS. ZERO.
ARREST THEM ALL.
DEATH PENALTY FOR MANY. QUICK! NO LONG TRIALS.
WE. HAVE. HAD. ENOUGH!
>>21862145
>Caroline Wren
Thought there was a Q drop mentioning her.
Can't seem to find it. (Along with other drops I KNOW were there!) I digress…
When does a BIRD SING?
Side note–
Also, AG is MOSAD Shill…
Much like Musk, working to save himself??!
Since BO deleted that post, any other anon's remember a drop with the name Caroline Wren?
>Here we go AGAIN!
Better the fuck not!!
15
Oct 31, 2017 11:00:47 PM EDT
Anonymous ID: grTMpzrL No. 147434025
There are more good people than bad.The wizards and warlocks (inside term) will not allow another SATANIC Evil POS control our country.Realize Soros, Clintons, Obama, Putin, etc. are all controlled by 3 families (the 4th was removed post Trump's victory).
11.3 - Podesta indicted
11.6 - Huma indicted
Manafort was placed into Trump's camp (as well as others). The corruption that will come out is so serious that deals must be cut for people to walk away otherwise 70% of elected politicians would be in jail (you are seeing it already begin). A deep cleaning is occurring and the prevention and defense of pure evil is occurring on a daily basis. They never thought they were going to lose control of the Presidency (not just D's) and thought they had control since making past mistakes (JFK, Reagan).
Good speed, Patriots.
PS, Soros is targeted.
>Any idea why this motherfucker endorsed Kamala?
He's a corrupt POS that's why. Even Judicial Watch was on to this shit, way back in the day.
He signed SBX211 Overnight, which gave RETROACTIVE immunity to a bunch of CROOKED, Judges who were receiving ILLEGAL PAYMENTS!
https://ballotpedia.org/SBX2_11
SBX2 11 is a California Senate Bill passed in 2009. The bill was signed into law by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger on February 20, 2009. The bill reinstated certain supplemental benefits for judges and gave them retroactive immunity for accepting compensation from the county of Los Angeles, which the Constitution clearly states shall be set by the legislature. A story about the bill, and a link to it, can be found at Full Disclosure Network.[1]
Ronald George is the chairman of the Judicial Council of California which wrote SBX2 11.,[2]
An organization known as Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit against the county. In October 2008, a California appellate court decision, Sturgeon v. County of Los Angeles declared the payments by the county to the judges were unconstitutional, thus reversing the decision made by a Superior Court of Los Angeles.[3][4]
In March 2009, attorney Richard Fine, was jailed in retaliation for exposing the corruption, now involving all branches of California government. More information can be found in the story by Full Disclosure Network. From his jail cell, Fine filed various motions and petitions, including a certiorari petition in Supreme Court of the United States. The question before the court was whether or not Judge Yaffe should have ruled in a case which Fine represented plaintiffs in, against the county of Los Angeles, which has been paying Yaffe and other judges the supplemental benefits for years. According to the U.S. Supreme Court docket information on Attorney Fine's petition the justices were set to discuss the case on September 29, 2009 and denied the petition on October 5, 2009.[5]
Ron Branson encountered the same type of bias by judges in 1982 while helping a friend with a case against the county. He wrote Judicial Accountability Initiative Law in 1995 after he brought a lawsuit in 1994 against the county and seven police officers for false arrest, false imprisonment and unwarranted strip-search, as well as other charges; and when the City of Los Angeles defaulted, no judgment came, although the Constitution mandates one be rendered within ninety days of default. Branson’s biography, as well as the amendment to a state or federal Constitution, known as J.A.I.L. (Judicial Accountability Initiative Law), can be found at: JAIL 4 Judges.
>>21862185
>to deny that [THEY] have been flipped is a Q sin
Uh, no.
I never Consented to [THEM] getting DEALS!
>Jiggle tits with consumed children in the belly.
>Hero!
Kek
True story.
No. Hero. No. Idol.
The Sperminator.
Unlike Epstein doing it in a lab, he did it in the open.
>notable ABC fraud
>>her father endorses Trump
>strange
>same with Angelina Jolie's father
Something reminds me of this post.
Could [THEY] be working to save their satanic offspring, or are they Organically supporting?
Just wondering your thoughts on Child Trafficking and Satanic Ritual Abuse?
Should there be DEALS cut for that?
A U.S. president has broad powers to issue pardons to individuals involved in criminal investigations. But are those powers unlimited? No, there are some limitations such as for offenses on a state level. And, it is unsettled whether a president can pardon him- or herself.
A U.S. president has broad but not unlimited powers to pardon. For example, a president cannot pardon someone for a state crime. And constitutional experts are divided on whether a president can pardon him- or herself.
The U.S. Constitution, Article II, Section 2, Clause 1 reads: “The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment (emphasis added).”
There is a strong consensus among legal experts that a president cannot pardon someone for a state offense, as the Constitution notes “offenses against the United States.” In other words, state law enforcement authorities could review any criminal allegations, without presidential intervention, to determine if they rise to the level of a state offense.
The legal record is also clear that a president can pardon for a presumptive crime, like what then-President Gerald Ford did with his predecessor Richard Nixon on Sept. 8, 1974. In the aftermath of Watergate, Ford gave Nixon, who resigned from the presidency a month earlier, an “absolute pardon for all offenses against the United States which he, Richard Nixon, has committed or may have committed or taken part in during the period from Jan. 20, 1969 through Aug. 9, 1974.”
The U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the presidential power to pardon in ex parte Garland, an 1866 case involving a former Confederate senator who had been pardoned by President Andrew Johnson. In that case, the high court made clear that the pardon power “extends to every offense known to the law, and may be exercised at any time after its commission, either before legal proceedings are taken or during their pendency, or after conviction and judgment.”
One unsettled legal question is whether a president can pardon himself. The Constitution says a president cannot pardon “in cases of impeachment.” Expert legal opinions on this question vary, and the U.S. Supreme Court has not weighed in on this issue.
https://www.americanbar.org/advocacy/governmental_legislative_work/publications/washingtonletter/dec-2020-wl/legal-fact-check-pardons-1220wl/
Forgot link
No way. CA is RED!
If it stays Blue, the Q failed to protect the vote.
There is NO WAY NewScum wasn't recalled, let alone voted to stay in there. No way GASCON was elected either.
They have allowed the FRAUD far too long. Many CA Patriots WILL. NOT. STAND. FOR. ANY. MOAR. FRAUD.
>kek hungry as a …..
>WALZ:
2262
Sep 21, 2018 6:46:16 PM EDT
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 000000 No. 289
MUSIC IS ABOUT TO STOP.
202-456-1414
Q