Just in case this isn't a shitposting Canadian:
https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/487563422/mh370-found-at-3476895-9306392
https://archive.is/ZlNBj
MH370 Found at -34.76895, 93.06392
Screencap this: This will be the biggest news story in 24 hours
The exact location the object matches INMARSAT data perfectly, matching the exact trajectory of the plane ditching at the ARC7 signal location.
The object is located only 4KM SE of the ARC7 location, the last-known signal of the plane over the Indian Ocean.
Hillshade analysis of the GoPhoenix_SAS_5m_WGS84_00 geotiff data provided by Fugro and the ATSB, combined with smoothing and upscaling of the Geotiff file.
This is the hull, positioned upside down with the wheel wells exposed.
>inb4 Diego Garcia and MH17
The jet engine pinged at S34.75 E93 and then was never heard from again. This object perfectly adheres to the plane hitting a rapid descent (not a controlled ditching) immediately following this ping and impacting the ocean floor near -34.76895, 93.06392
No video evidence of the MH370 in flight has ever been confirmed. I'm showing you an image of a debris field 4.6KM from where a confirmed MH370 signal pinged. You can access the data here: https://researchdata.edu.au/the-search-flight-computational-infrastructure/1343779?fl
Hi Canberra,here's the raw bathymetry data without any processing. This is the Fugro/GoPhoenix Bathymetry data provided by ATSB. The reason I looked more closely at this object was its unusual radiance and reflectivity when running it through foto forensics, as well as its location in the zone of interest proposed by Blelly/Marchand
The exact location of the debris on the seafloor places it ~3 NM past ARC7 in this diagram provided by Blelly and Marchand, who proposed the plane began a controlled ditching at ARC7. Source: https://www.mh370-caption.net/wp-content/uploads/Blelly-Analysis-of-Flight-MH370.pdf
Oddly, the object, which measures ~30-40m per QGIS calculations, was not mentioned in the GoPhoenix contact reports conducted by the search team. I think it was overlooked because of its resemblance to geological elements.
You will need to run that GEOTIFF data through a GIS program to optimize it and change the contrast. The red gradient doesn't show the square edges of the object with the same definition.
It's not a knife, it's a likely man-made object the length of a Boeing 777 found 4KM from the last known signal.
No, it is located 4.5KM from the final 'handshake signal', per the wiki https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malaysia_Airlines_Flight_370_satellite_communications
ATSB and Kementerian Pengangkutan Malaysia are aware of this location
Arc7 final MH370 signal compared to debris field. 4.65KM SW
The key here are the three straight edges and the curved portion on the left. I have looked at all the 30m GoPhoenix data and while there are plenty of objects of interest, even the pixellation won't 'correct' geological formations to maintain that type of shape.
High contrast with increased hillshade analysis and upscaling shows how pronounced this is.
The key argument many posed was that the debris would be far more scattered and the plane would be little more than fragments.
I think this is what is left of the fuselage, perhaps two thirds or half of it. It's actually unlikely it would stay in one piece on impact, but some have floated the idea that the pilot attempted a controlled ditching of the plane.