Beverley Turner: "Rand Paul is known for his outspoken criticism of COVID policies. He's taken aim at what he calls the Biden-Harris CDC over their latest vaccine recommendations for infants. The CDC's 2024 to 25 COVID-19 vaccine immunization schedule. Advises, three doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine for children as young as six months old."
"That is right. Three doses for babies. Paul didn't mince words in his criticism. He tweeted, and I quote, Pfizer drug reps, I mean the Biden-Harris CDC, insist that your six-month-old get three COVID vaccines despite no scientific studies demonstrating decreased hospitalization or death. Anyone surprised that the public is now hesitant to believe any CDC recommendations."
"So let's break this down. Paul is essentially accusing the CDC of acting like pharmaceutical sales reps rather than an impartial health agency. He's pointing out that there is no scientific evidence showing these vaccines reduce hospitalization or death in infants. Yet the CDC is pushing for not one, not two, but three. doses in babies. Their vaccine schedule suggests that previously unvaccinated children, aged 6 months to 4 years, should receive an initial dose, followed by another at least 3 to 8 weeks later, and a third at least 8 weeks after dose 2."
"I despair. Now I don't know about you, but the idea of injecting a 6 month old baby with a vaccine. three times, especially one with no proven benefits for that age group is utterly bonkers. And here's where it gets interesting. Paul's criticism goes beyond just a specific recommendation. He's suggesting that this kind of baseless guidance is eroding public trust in the CDC as a whole and honestly, can you blame people for being skeptical?"
"And when you combine Paul's criticism with Vance's personal experience and the revelations about public figures hiding their vaccine injuries, a very troubling picture emerges. We're looking at a situation where our health institutions are pushing vaccines on the most vulnerable members of our society, whilst those who've experienced adverse effects are too afraid to speak out. This culture of silence and fear is deeply concerning. If public figures and even senators are afraid to discuss their vaccine experiences."
"What hope do ordinary citizens have? How can we have an honest and open dialogue about vaccine safety if people are terrified of being judged, of being labeled anti-vaxxers for simply sharing their experiences or their concerns? It's worth noting that the mainstream media has been. largely silent on these issues. What a surprise. You won't see CNN or the BBC giving airtime to Vance's vaccine experience or Paul's criticism of the CDC. It is left to independent voices like ours to bring these crucial stories to light."
"So what's the takeaway from all this? Well, first and foremost, we need more transparency. If vaccines are truly safe and effective, then there should be no fear. in discussing potential side effects or questioning recommendations."
https://x.com/newstart_2024/status/1855586331717439981
CNN: Do you see all undocumented immigrants — should they all be kicked out of the country?”
US Senator Jim Banks: “Conservative estimates say that there are at least 15 million illegals — it's my hope that we deport every single one of them.”
https://x.com/WallStreetApes/status/1855767797328236820
🤔cc: @realDonaldTrump
https://x.com/DanScavino/status/1855788583220662455
>based