Anonymous ID: 60101e Nov. 23, 2024, 8:26 a.m. No.22043452   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3454

>>22043417 pb

>Basically, the only things Agri puts back in the soil is NPK

i'll never be able to find it again, but many yrs ago anon came across a report stating that "modern" farming practices had rendered soil totally devoid of trace mineral content, and the situation had reached crisis proportions. that report was written in 1929.

Anonymous ID: 60101e Nov. 23, 2024, 8:34 a.m. No.22043481   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>22043464

>Terra preta is less prone to nutrient leaching because of its high concentration of charcoal, microbial life and organic matter. The combination accumulates nutrients, minerals and microorganisms and withstands leaching.

and it was invented and created by pre-columbian south american natives in the brazilian rain forest

"modern" agriculturists and scientists have been unable to duplicate the process, and resort to mining deposit left by the indians

infinitely superior to today's slash and burn farming which irreparably destroys rain forest

while remaining viable farmland only a few yrs

they won't be happy until the entire amazon rainforest is turned into a desert, like the sahara

Anonymous ID: 60101e Nov. 23, 2024, 8:37 a.m. No.22043489   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>22043467

>If we don't stop the chemtrails no amount of soil enhancing/developing will matter.

start handing out stingers to civilians

shit loads of 'em stored in NG depots all over the country

just sayin'โ€ฆโ€ฆ

time for some home grown action?

Anonymous ID: 60101e Nov. 23, 2024, 9:18 a.m. No.22043645   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3658

>>22043623

>If Einstien was right, light would not be able to travel at the "speed of light"

false

stay in your lane, child

ya wanna post a critique of SRT and GRT

read "Old Physics for New" by Thomas E. Phipps

then get back to us

the world needs LESS scientifically illiterate tards speculating about science-y things

Anonymous ID: 60101e Nov. 23, 2024, 9:29 a.m. No.22043696   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3722

>>22043658

>Photons have mass

i understand the basis for your earlier assertion

you can "calculate" a mass for a photon by combining

E=mc^2 and E=hv

but it's never been measured directly

and you are arguing apples and oranges

the statement that "nothing" can travel at the speed of light is NOT a part of SRT or GRT

but an "interpretation" of the theories by people who did not understand them

Einstein himself famously remarked that he himself no longer understood relativity after the mathematicians (Minkowski) got hold of it

ironic, since Einstein was himself no more than a second-rate mathematican, not a PHYSICIST