Just another thought on anonymity from a discussion in the last bread.

I don't think for a minute that I am anon here from the white hats (and the black hats) who monitor these boards.

If you do you have a false sense of security. We are only Anon to one another (and I like that because no fame fagging or "special weight" applied to anyone's posts). They stand on their own.

If there is a time to put our names behind what we believe then I will stand up and be counted. Many of us are in this until the end. If we lose then I don't doubt there will be consequences for we Anons. But I trust the plan, I trust Q, and I trust POTUS.

WWG1WGA. Proud to serve with you Anons.

>>2205050

It is hard to make predictions, especially about the future. Yogi Berra

Check out our bread >>2204977 if you want the latest on what the clockfags are thinking.

Current Summary of Main theories:

Posts at matching time marker and the reflection are most likely to be relevant.

Deltas matter and can indicate secondary relevant posts (always :15, :10, :05, :01 plus whatever delta indicated by tweet revisions or difference between Q posts and DJT tweets) +/- including from the reflection.

All the stamps matter (even seconds) and can be used to connect and confirm posts.

Reflections in the mirror of 5:5 (:25 marker) are relevant.

The clock includes a hexadecimal code that can be decoded and read.

Those are the ones that seem most prevalent in the current discussion. Haven't seen anyone trying to predict the next Q posts recently.