>Ukraine using drones to plug manpower gaps – CNN
>Ukrainian lines in danger of collapse
>This is garbage
Actually, this is truthful reporting.
Ukrainians are getting massacred, and the Ukrainian frontline is near collapse.
Reality.
>so the war objectives of the Ukrainian government are almost complete: total depopulation of the regions of Ukraine that they want to make their own or sell off to varous multi-national cabal entities?
if they manage to kill the 18-25 year old males by conscripting them, what is going to be left of the country in the future?
sell off the rest to Larry Fink's Blackrock
https://www.unz.com/lromanoff/the-jewish-hasbara-in-all-its-glory-lies-lies-everywhere/
>Kiev has over 500,000 casualties, and 1/5 dead
I think it is actually at least double that, and 2/3 dead.
Ukrainian TV reported over 1.2m casualties before it was taken off the air.
Hasbara Trolls
According to Jewish officials, Israel is hiring university students to post pro-Israel messages on social media networks – but without identifying themselves as government trolls.[45][46]
The government is offering Israeli students full or partial scholarships to combat “online anti-Semitism and calls to boycott Israel”.
One project was initiated by the 300,000-strong National Union of Israeli Students, where Israeli students are paid $2,000 to work five hours per week to “lead the battle against hostile websites while working from the comfort of their own homes”.[47]
Here is the original document in Hebrew,[48]
and here is a translation.[49]
They primarily monitor websites to post positive (even if false) messages and to remove “anti-Semitic” content from social networks, or at least to attack this content, often in groups. This major project is responsible for all internet content and all social media channels including Facebook and Twitter in many languages, as well as YouTube and others. The entire program, as with all of Hasbara, conflates any criticism of Israel or the Jews with anti-Semitism or Jew-hatred, labels used much too frequently as an extortionist measure to intimidate through fear of the consequences of such labeling. The Jerusalem Post has run many articles on the Israeli government’s plans to use students around the world in efforts “to defend itself in social media”.[50]
https://www.unz.com/lromanoff/the-jewish-hasbara-in-all-its-glory-lies-lies-everywhere/
http://www.middle-east-info.org/take/wujshasbara.pdf
Hasbara Handbook
Chapter 7 – Seven Basic Propaganda Devices
“Propaganda is used by those who want to communicate in ways that engage the emotions and downplay rationality, in an attempt to promote a certain message. To effectively present Israel to the public, and to counter anti-Israel messages, it is necessary to understand propaganda devices.”
These first 7 points, and the others that follow, are actual templates that Jews have developed to assist in their efforts to control public opinion and to “pull the wires that control the public mind“, as Edward Bernays was so fond of saying.[54]
We see these used extensively in the mass media, in articles written by Jewish Hasbara enthusiasts, and very often in the comment threads on online articles. If you know what to look for, and you are paying attention, these are easily identifiable.
Name Calling
“Through the careful choice of words, the name calling technique links a person or an idea to a negative symbol. Creating negative connotations by name calling is done to try and get the audience to reject a person or idea on the basis of negative associations, without allowing a real examination of that person or idea. Name calling is hard to counter. Call demonstrations “riots”. Call a political organisation a “terrorist organisation”, and so on.” Just use any dirty names you can imagine to degrade an opponent’s position. Neo-Nazi, anti-Semite. “Those opposed to Israel (or the Jews) use name-calling all the time.” Of course, Jews and the Jewish media never do this.
Glittering Generality
This is name calling in reverse. Use positive phrases in order to lend a positive image to things. Freedom, liberty, science, democracy, freedom fighter.
Transfer
“Transfer involves taking some of the prestige and authority of one concept and applying it to another.” Stand beside a UN flag. With China, pretend you live in Beijing, or attended Tsinghua or Fudan University. Mention famous names, even if irrelevant.
Testimonial
“Means enlisting the support of somebody admired or famous to endorse an ideal or campaign. Testimonial … can be manipulated, such as when a footballer is used to support a political campaign they have only a limited understanding of. Testimonial can lend weight to an argument that it doesn’t deserve. Quotes can work as testimonial, even when … out of context.” Use quotations, internet links, anything out of context or not, even if false, to support your position and destroy the opponent’s position.
Also, make use of celebrities. [Celebrities] can be “easily manipulated because they care more about their public image than about the Middle East, and threats of tainting their image (with charges of anti-Semitism) will usually persuade them to (either cooperate or) back off.”
Plain Folks
Convince the listener that the speaker is a ‘regular guy’. (No dog in the fight, no axe to grind.)
Fear
“Listeners have deep-seated fears of violence and disorder … Fear is easily manipulated. Listeners are too preoccupied by threats to think critically about a speaker’s message. Fear can be successfully utilised by pointing out the consequences … physical risk or financial ruin.” You don’t want to be tarnished as “anti-Semitic” or a “holocaust denier”. You could lose your job and your reputation. Your children could be forced to change schools.
Bandwagon
“People are happy to be part of the crowd … Give the impression that “Israel is the team to support, that this is the way the wind is blowing.” Try to leave the impression that ‘almost everyone’ thinks as you say. Exaggerate the volume of support for your position.
Set the Agenda
Hasbara students are taught from the first day that “The person who sets the agenda will usually win.”
Hasbara Handbook, continued
Frame the Debate
Jewish mentors teach students to always attempt to reframe debates to focus only on issues that fit the Jewish agenda. Framing is one of the more insidious tools of propaganda – instructing us ‘how to think’ about a particular event. The invasion and destruction of Iraq were termed by the US military and the Jewish media as “Operation Iraqi Freedom”. People who are genuinely concerned about contamination and dangerous side-effects of vaccines are termed “Vaccination terrorists”. Hong Kong’s terrorists are defined in the Jewish media as “democracy protestors” – who, in one university lab alone, had created more than 10,000 petrol bombs which were used on government buildings and police stations (and on the police themselves). These ‘democracy protestors’ also poured gasoline on a man who disagreed with them, and set him on fire. You can see the video here:[55]
In all these cases, the first step is to provide a useful propaganda definition which, if adopted by the public, eliminates independent thought in one swoop.
Two major approaches: Point scoring and genuine debate.
“Point scoring involves attacking opponents by undermining their positions, (literally “scoring points”). It ought to give the appearance of rational debate, whilst avoiding any genuine discussion. This works because most people fail to analyse what they hear. It is the correct method when the audience is only partially engaged, like on the Internet. It is necessary to disguise this by giving the impression of honest debate. “That’s an interesting point but it’s not really the right question . . .” This appears to address what was said, but actually ignores it and proceeds to reframe the discussion by setting a new agenda. “Always try to avoid debate by turning criticism of Israel or the Jews into an attack on the opposition, narrowed to a person if possible, and suggest that person is anti-Semitic or supports terrorism or cannot be trusted.”
When not to Engage
One main theme that permeates the Hasbara mentality is: “Don’t fight if you can’t win.” We see this very frequently in online comment threads where an obvious Hasbara troll will make false claims about some historical topic, generally meant to absolve Jews from their crimes, or to blame the victim. If those claims are countered by another reader who clearly knows the facts and likely has a superior understanding, the Jewish commenter will almost always simply disappear. “Walk away when you encounter anyone more experienced or well-versed.” And never engage if you can’t control the terms and agenda of the debate because this means the debate is “set up badly” and you cannot win.
When you engage on a topic, you give it a sense of legitimacy, so never engage on a topic you don’t want considered ‘legitimate’. Examples would be the fact that the Russian Bolsheviks were almost entirely Jews who were responsible for the gulags and tens of millions of deaths. Or the fact that opium in China was entirely a Jewish business. Or that the centuries of slave-trading were similar. In other words, don’t engage on the topic of Jewish crimes because your participation helps to make that topic ‘legitimate’.
Hasbara Handbook, continued
Pre-emptive Actions are Always Preferable
From the Handbook: “People believe the first thing they hear about an issue, and filter subsequent information based on that belief. Once they believe something, it is hard to convince them that they were wrong in the first place.”
We see evidence of this everywhere. This is the reason the mass media fed us the full-blown story of 9-11 the next morning, consisting mostly of facts no one could possibly have known at that stage. It was the same with ZIKA, COVID, and so many other events. The purpose is to have the public mind accept the desired narrative, and this means feeding it to the public prior to any real facts becoming known. When the truth begins to escape later, doubts will emerge but it will be difficult for most people to change their minds, having already accepted the first story as true.
We see this when portions of buried history begin to come to light, usually involving serious Jewish crimes. When Jews are afraid that the unpleasant truths of their history might become public knowledge, when the details suddenly are discovered and begin escaping confinement, multiple Jewish authors are ready to leap into the breach.
When the truth began to emerge that the radical depopulation of Easter Island was due to Jewish slave traders hunting workers for their guano mines in Peru, Jared Diamond, a Jewish professor at UC, was there to tell us in a new book that the Easter Islanders had little civil wars and unfortunately killed off (and then ate) each other.[56]
When news began to emerge that Ireland’s depopulation of about 80% was also due to Jewish slave traders, the Jewish Southern Poverty Law Center found an Irish flake and “independent scholar” named Liam Hogan to write an article claiming Ireland had never been depopulated and ‘Irish slaves’ was just a ‘meme’ promulgated by ‘racists’.[57]
I could probably catalogue more than 100 of these preventive cover-ups of Jewish crimes, many of the utmost gravity and grimness, some involving deaths in the tens and hundreds of millions, and all profiting from human misery. I have provided a few more examples at the end of this essay. In all such cases, the intent of the false and fabricated history is to put these thoughts into the public mind first, so that they will be less likely to believe the truth when it finally emerges in full form. This is common with Jewish authors Shakony, Perlmann, Shapiro, Dikotter, Brizay, Lovell, and many more, at least one to fit every occasion where a desperate re-writing of history becomes urgently necessary.
We see this very often on websites where reader comments are permitted on articles. If an author is considered unsympathetic to Jews or to Israel, very often the Hasbara Trolls will be there to post the first one or first few comments, denigrating the author. The intent is that new readers perhaps unfamiliar with the writer, and seeing these comments first, may revise their opinion of the article and the author. Such comments buried in the middle of several hundred have little or no impact, but can have an effect at the beginning.