tyb
SWAHA! let her rip.
aum shanti shanti shanti
peace peace peace
Do the Math.
India is one third the size of USA.
Their top IT schools equivalent with MIt number 5 or 6.
The ratio of Population India to population USA is almost over 4:1.
Ratio of the population of India to the population of the USA is approximately 4.43:1.
Just to live in India is a massive struggle - harsh weather, poverty… the people who "make it" there are exceptions. Massive crowding. unsanitary conditions.
1/ 3 land ~4. 5 x's the population?
Human density is?
To compare the population density per unit of land between India and the USA, we can use the following approximate figures:
Land Area of India: Approximately 3,287,263 square kilometers.
Land Area of USA: Approximately 9,833,517 square kilometers.
Population of India: Approximately 1,461,649,461 people.
Population of USA: Approximately 330,000,000 people.
First, let's calculate the population density for both countries:
Population Density of India:
Density = Population / Land Area = 1,461,649,461 / 3,287,263 ≈ 445 people per square kilometer.
Population Density of USA:
Density = Population / Land Area = 330,000,000 / 9,833,517 ≈ 34 people per square kilometer.
Now, comparing these densities:
India's population density is approximately 445 people per square kilometer.
USA's population density is approximately 34 people per square kilometer.
Therefore,India's population density per unit of land is about 13.1 times higher than that of the USA.
This comparison aligns with the statement that India has about 1/3 the land area of the USA but approximately ~4.5 times the population, illustrating the significant difference in population density between the two countries.
(to be continued)
I'm sure many savants here can see where I'm going with this?
you are very wrong
famous mathematician Native India.
Took one hundred years for Cambridge Mathematicians to finally understand what he was doing.
Created a whole new field of mathematics when they finally caught up.
He struggled without money for paper. Did work on a chalk board; lost forever.
He was taken in by Cambridge then sent back - health reasons. And fact is NONe of the top mathematicians there could even GROK what he was doing.
Baring one or maybe 2 ?
Many were sent letters by Ramanujan and failed to recognize his skill
Srinivasa Ramanujan was an Indian mathematician who, despite having almost no formal training in pure mathematics, made profound contributions to several mathematical fields during his time at Cambridge University. Here's a summary of his work and impact:
Number Theory: Ramanujan's work in number theory is perhaps his most recognized contribution. He developed theories about the partition function, providing insights into how numbers can be divided into sums. His work on highly composite numbers, where he studied numbers with more divisors than any smaller number, was groundbreaking. His results included new divisibility properties and formulas for partitions, notably the congruences for the partition function
p
(
n
)
like
p
(
5
k
+
4
)
≡
0
(
m
o
d
5
)
,
p
(
7
k
+
5
)
≡
0
(
m
o
d
7
)
, and
p
(
11
k
+
6
)
≡
0
(
m
o
d
11
)
.
Modular Forms and Mock Theta Functions: At Cambridge, Ramanujan worked extensively on modular forms, contributing to the understanding of these complex mathematical objects through what is now known as the Ramanujan theta function. His later work included the introduction of mock theta functions, which he described in his final letters to G.H. Hardy. These were initially seen as incomplete functions but have since been recognized as part of a broader theory of mock modular forms, influencing modern mathematical research.
Infinite Series and Continued Fractions: Ramanujan's intuitive grasp of infinite series led him to discover many identities and formulas, including those related to the Riemann zeta function. His work on continued fractions included novel approaches and results that were ahead of their time, influencing areas like complex analysis.
Collaboration with G.H. Hardy: Ramanujan's collaboration with British mathematician G.H. Hardy was pivotal. Together, they published several papers, including one on the circle method, which helped solve Waring's problem among others. Hardy introduced Ramanujan to the formal methods of proof and publication, and in return, Ramanujan's insights enriched Hardy's own work.
Notebooks and Lost Notebook: Ramanujan's three notebooks and the "lost notebook" discovered posthumously contain thousands of results, many without proofs. These notebooks have been a source of inspiration and research for mathematicians for decades, leading to numerous publications by scholars like Bruce C. Berndt and George Andrews. The lost notebook, in particular, was key to understanding Ramanujan's work on mock theta functions.
Ramanujan's time at Cambridge was marked by his election as a Fellow of the Royal Society and a Fellow of Trinity College in 1918, both significant honors. Despite his health deteriorating, his mathematical output remained prolific, leaving a legacy that continues to inspire and challenge mathematicians to this day
>>22231987
Why a "shit hole"
Maybe Brits and Mugals had something to do with it?
They were stole blind.
And if they didn't join muslim religion they lost their heads.
Also, Brits fomented division between Hindu and Muslim.
They were ripped off.
sorry with the mix up with the cut and paste.
rinivasa Ramanujan's work at Cambridge University during his collaboration with G.H. Hardy is renowned for its depth and originality in the field of mathematics, particularly in number theory, mathematical analysis, and infinite series. Here's an overview:
Collaboration with G.H. Hardy:
Arrival at Cambridge: Ramanujan arrived in Cambridge in April 1914, where he began working closely with the mathematician G.H. Hardy. This collaboration was pivotal, as Hardy was one of the few mathematicians who could fully appreciate Ramanujan's unique insights and methods.
Number Theory: Much of Ramanujan's work at Cambridge centered around number theory. He made significant contributions to the study of the partition function (the number of ways in which a number can be expressed as a sum of positive integers), particularly with his famous congruences for partitions.
Mock Theta Functions: One of Ramanujan's most intriguing contributions was the development of the "mock theta functions." These were introduced in one of his last letters to Hardy before his health declined. These functions were enigmatic at the time but have since been recognized as an important bridge between modular forms and elliptic functions, influencing modern areas like black hole physics.
Highly Composite Numbers: Ramanujan's work on highly composite numbers, which are numbers with more divisors than any smaller number, led to his thesis for his Bachelor of Science degree by research (equivalent to a Ph.D.) from Cambridge in 1916. This work included new insights into the distribution of prime numbers and the properties of integers.
Continued Fractions: He explored continued fractions, providing new expansions and identities, some of which were later used in developing algorithms in computer science.
Elliptic Functions: Ramanujan's work with elliptic functions and their modular equations was profound, offering new identities and equations that were ahead of their time.
Recognition and Health:
Fellowships: His contributions were recognized with his election as a Fellow of the Royal Society in 1918, making him one of the youngest and the first Indian to achieve this honor. He was also elected as a Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge, that same year.
Ill Health: Unfortunately, Ramanujan's health deteriorated during his time in England, primarily due to the cold climate and possibly malnutrition, leading to his return to India in 1919. His work continued until his death in 1920, but much of it was recorded in what is now known as his "lost notebook," which was rediscovered in 1976 by George Andrews.
Ramanujan's Cambridge period was marked by a prolific output of mathematical theorems and insights, many of which were so advanced that they took decades to be fully understood or utilized by the mathematical community. His work continues to inspire and challenge mathematicians to this day.
you are just plain ignorant or pretending.
Did you get hired as a glow-fag
This mathematician, Srinivasan Ramanujan taught himself, without a school. He just got a hold of a few books.
other theorems, advances, he made on his own without help. Without knowing others had done it.
Ramanujan at Cambridge.
Maybe I can get back to my original point.
Why they are better.
It's a different argument than Race, DNA or alleged inferiority or superiority between the two group.
It's simple Darwinian-type maths.
If you have four or five times the people to choose from, it means the competition there is way more difficult to conquer.
They have more applicants.
And whereas US has one top engineering school MIT
India has 4 or 5 equivalent.
So they are able to train a larger number of extra-competent people.
If you saw how hard people had to work there, to accomplish, and the conditions under which they had to strive, you'd understand why, easily.
The chances of admission for a U.S. graduate into MIT versus an Indian graduate into a top IT school in India involve different contexts, systems, and criteria. Here's a detailed comparison based on the available information:
Admission to MIT for a U.S. Graduate:
Acceptance Rate: MIT's overall acceptance rate is around 4.1% for undergraduate admissions, making it one of the most selective institutions globally.
Selection Criteria: MIT looks for students with outstanding academic achievements, a strong match with the institute's values, and a holistic profile including extracurriculars, recommendations, and essays. The emphasis is on a well-rounded individual with a passion for science, technology, engineering, or mathematics (STEM).
Standardized Tests: While MIT has waived the requirement for standardized tests like the SAT/ACT due to COVID-19, when applicable, high scores are expected for competitive applicants.
Admission to Top IT Schools in India for an Indian Graduate:
IITs (Indian Institutes of Technology): Known for their rigorous admission process through the Joint Entrance Examination (JEE), which is extremely competitive. For example, in 2024, IIT Bombay had an acceptance rate that is often considered lower than MIT's when looking at the number of applicants versus admissions.
Selection Criteria: Admission is predominantly based on JEE scores, which tests aptitude in physics, chemistry, and mathematics. However, unlike MIT, the emphasis here is more on academic performance in specific subjects rather than a holistic profile.
Preparation: Indian students typically prepare for years, focusing intensely on these specific subjects to crack the JEE, often at the expense of a broader educational experience.
Comparative Analysis:
Difficulty and Focus: Both institutions are highly selective, but the path to MIT involves showcasing a broader range of talents, experiences, and insights into one's field of interest. Conversely, admission to IITs is heavily weighted on one exam, JEE, which might not reflect the whole spectrum of a student's capabilities but rather their mastery in certain subjects.
Cultural and Educational Background: Indian students from the U.S. might find the transition to MIT's application process more aligned with their educational experiences, focusing on a narrative of their academic journey and personal development. For an Indian student aiming for an IIT, the preparation is often more about mastering the JEE, which can be a high-stress, narrow focus.
Competition: In terms of sheer numbers, IITs see applications from a vast number of students due to India's population and the cultural prestige associated with IITs. The competition for MIT is global but might be less intense in sheer numbers from any single country compared to IITs from India.
Outcome: An Indian student aiming for MIT might need to cultivate an international profile, including Olympiads, research, or international academic recognition, to stand out, as suggested by some X posts. Whereas, success in the JEE is the primary pathway for IITs.
In conclusion, getting into MIT as a U.S. graduate involves navigating a holistic admissions process, which might be more familiar to students accustomed to the U.S. educational system. For an Indian graduate aiming for IITs, the challenge is to excel in a highly competitive, exam-centered process. Both scenarios demand exceptional performance but in different ways.
Competition is greater in India.
Therefor, the ones who make it through, are often superior to USA applicants.
Elon Musk has big plans, wants to go to mars (kek) And he wants the top workers.
Isn't part of Musk's success his winnowing of the employees he chooses? He's very picky.
Could that be the key to his success?
He wants people who are driven. So he's putting it out there now. For what he wants, he need the East Indians.
I know, for sure, myself, i fail to have the temperament to be as driven as an East Indian competitor.
Most Americans are not adapted to that level of striving?
For instance, in Classical East Music training?
No state-side musician hopefull comes clost to what they are put through over there.
Includes drummers, Instrumentalist and vocalists.
Musicians just seem to lack that kind of extreme training here?
But perhaps USA musicians could make it up in other ways?
I like what Musk says about skies the limit. Trump is also all about deal making with Win-Win outcomes.
Remember East Indian musicians are composing extemporaneous; it's not written down.
Here's a duet (war) between North Indian system (sarod, like a lute) and South Indian, (violin)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8coMOd0jHXI
Doesn't mean other people can't get jobs.
Success breeds success.
Most Americans are not adapted to that level of striving?
For instance, in Classical East Music training?
No state-side musician hopefull comes clost to what they are put through over there.
Includes drummers, Instrumentalist and vocalists.
Musicians just seem to lack that kind of extreme training here?
But perhaps USA musicians could make it up in other ways?
I like what Musk says about skies the limit. Trump is also all about deal making with Win-Win outcomes.
Remember East Indian musicians are composing extemporaneous; it's not written down.
Here's a duet (war) between North Indian system (sarod, like a lute) and South Indian, (violin)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8coMOd0jHXI
sorry for the double pasta.
Definitely a deep "Night Shift" piece.
Loomer is a glow-fag.
Is that her shooped in, or is it real?
Also didn't Bannon or Winters report there was a dust up between Loomer and the BloodBath guy just last week?
Looks shooped to me.
Did they paste her head over the other woman's head (blond?)
At the special week-end in AZ?
>>22231985
no body can be banned here, liar.
>>22232622
try harder.
deleted then back the next bread with the same stinky poop.
anyway, admit you're a liar?
Ah, but real anon Q researchers knew that already.
YOu have your stupid say.
that's why you're here now.
Stop lying.
take a screen shot.
that's what I do when the brown shirts, like you, get control of the Bake and Admin.
gotcha dint I?
he's smart too.