I believe this drop was getting at the 'state secrets' idea?
unenforceable anyway. If you've got questions, put 'em out in the ether and other anons will answer if capable and if not will spark discussion/debate
yeah, it's sort of a weird case involving the Air Force, but in subsequent drops Q mentioned the state secrets thing.
>#4, #6, #8
'State Secrets' make sense in a vacuum, but I feel like they are so abused that the government effectively just has to shout "threat to national security!" and they can wiggle out of anything in the courts.
sauce?
ngl none of this feels organic
>Can a cybertruck be driven remotely by the spooks?
abso-fucking-lutely.
especially considering mr. clown contractor himself is in charge.
Saved that pepe