>>22279026 lb

I just realized it looks like it reads "Wife Man"

but is read

"Wise Man" since the letters changed

dictionary is from 18th c.

Coincidence?

Word Magik?

"Wife Man", is it a druid thang to have a trans female as the wifey?

Too many to be a coincidence?

Or some other cult, descended from Rome wherein the geld themselves.

Faggot cult? but closeted and duplicitous.

one of the links to the new bread from last bread is a bad link

Just sayn

https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/22279014.html#22279020

Not sure how they did that.

desperate times, desperate measures?

Weissman Weiss. also means "Wise" man maybe?

Weissmen "Wise Guys" always smirking jokesters.

>>22279131

"Watch the Wives" Right?

BOOM

>>22279170

buncha GELDing.

GELD , GILT, BLOOD , GOLD.

faggots.

>>22279188

chect.

>>22279181

GILT, Guilt

>>22279186

who? The trans female wives?

>>22279099

chkt.

Waiting for the Sun.

After the Rain, the good Times.

>>22279014

>>22279020

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1tNgPliXtkc

TYB

>>22279292

they can't get paid anymoar.

never can nor do we, here.

doesn't mean their right of speech was taken, as ours was, when we were banned.

>>22279437

Aleister aka Alexander Crowley

It's the motto of his cult

"Do what thou Wilt is the whole of the Law"

for the public they add the addendum "under love"

>>22279460

If true, fail.

>>22279470

"Do No Harm"

in hinduism it's "Ahimsa"

very difficult to accomplish.

So they are lying to imagine they meet that standard.

That's what forgiveness and Grace is for.

>>22279481

false

>>22279444

we all know what crack heads actually look like

>>22279580

yes. clown. Greer.

>>22279379

needed to "get rid" of him for some reason.

came across as a normal guy

They took down this vid, but it as too late.

>>22279618

sorta like leave Afghanistan first, then get the Americans and the military hardware out of there.

>>22279495

not sure of the exact date.

It was when the Baker's Union decided to be a formal News Agency?

and / or even earlier, when there were concerns "What if Grandma Read this?"

So the actually anon research stopped being put in the Notables/

It was when somebody started training Bakers and making rules as to what could be included included in notables.

The rules considered Fake News sites to be "sauce" so Grandma would approve and there'd be no offense given.

I always sorta liked it, looked on the bright side, since it gave us cover.

Leaders here, such as they are and were, seemed terrified of being mocked, more than we already are. The mockers use "gotcha" moments against us.

I always thought that no matter what we did, the opposition would always fabricate or blow=up "gotcha" moments, so it was no use trying to avoid that.

In other words, who cares what they say!

The real work we were doing was ignored, in any case.

But the Bakers try to minimize potential "Gotcha" moments.

Not a bad aggregator, when all is said and done.

Then people started about bloated Notables and if you look at early Notable tables, you'll see the "bloatables" complaint is an accurate observation.

Commentary goes in body of the breads.