>>22282967 pb
>>22282970 pb
It'sUK Huffington Post.
I'd say their leadership in the UK has much more serious ethics problems.
As far as their account on "X" seems there is zero content just ads.
What do you bet they are going under?
first ten posts are ads
Is it just me getting spammed by them?
half the posts are gossip, other half stale news, once you get by the ads.
Used to be a serious outlet? 25 years ago?
Schwab heiress working in White House sounds like 100% gossip. compare and contrast to Dems ethical problems?
Layoffs and Closures: After BuzzFeed acquired HuffPost in November 2020, there were significant layoffs, with 47 staff members let go in the U.S. and the closure of HuffPost Canada, which resulted in 23 more layoffs in Canada. This suggests financial restructuring might have been necessary.
Posts on X: There's been discussion in posts on X about HuffPost facing financial challenges, akin to other news outlets, with some suggesting they're turning to paywalls for access to content. This indicates an effort to find new revenue streams amidst financial difficulties.
Business Model Critique: Some critiques have focused on HuffPost's business model being unsustainable in the long run, which could be contributing to financial troubles.
as far as USA
while HuffPost has encountered financial difficulties, as evidenced by layoffs and operational changes, it continues to function as a news outlet. The reliability of its information would be assessed based on individual articles, sources cited, fact-checking processes, and editorial standards, which can vary from piece to piece.
should never achieve status of Notable
Why promote garbage in our Notables, especially when it is gossip? With no consequences.
The news was (if you read the piece) they tried to reach WH and Schwab for comment and no one returned their calls.
kekkkkekeity.