Anonymous ID: 343c3f Jan. 6, 2025, 6:03 a.m. No.22301861   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2024 >>2073 >>2173

>>22301824

King of Pedophiles

 

==Jimmy Savile and Prince Charles' very

close friendship with sex abuse bishop

Peter Ball==

 

Lit by the flickering light of a log fire, their faces glowed with sober mutual interest.

The prince with the troubled soul and the priest with all the answers.

Staff at Highgrove, the Prince of Wales’s country home, had grown accustomed to

these intimate exchanges when the Rt Rev Peter Ball, the now disgraced Bishop of

Gloucester, came to offer solace and enlightenment to their boss.

Charles had long been an admirer of the charismatic and dedicated Anglican

churchman, who slept on an old horsehair mattress on the floor of his own

Gloucester residence and rose for prayer at 4.30am.

 

When the Prince’s marriage to Diana was unravelling, Ball’s advice was sought and

the prince had written ‘personal letters’ to him. Later, the bishop encouraged him

over his relationship with the former Mrs Camilla Parker Bowles.

Indeed, so grateful were both Charles and Camilla for his guidance and his kindness

that Ball was invited to their wedding at Windsor Castle in 2005.

Throughout these years, Charles’s support for the bishop was unwavering. ‘They

would pray together in the Sanctuary,’ recalls one former aide.

The Sanctuary is a Harry Potter-esque temple built by Charles deep in a glade in

Highgrove’s grounds to mark the Millennium, and where he retreats for quiet

contemplation.

 

Constructed to a ‘sacred geometry’ design — the mathematical proportions of the

building are said to have religious significance — its decorations are minimal.

Inside, there is an oak table with a rush cross hanging above it, as well as the woodburning stove in front of which Charles and the bishop would sit.

Two stained glass windows are dedicated to the memory of Ted Hughes, the late

Poet Laureate, and the writer Sir Laurens van der Post, Charles’s philosopher guru.

One former member of the Highgrove staff told me that Ball himself had

consecrated the building, although it was later reported that the Bishop of London,

Richard Chartres, had been invited to perform a blessing.

Whatever the case, it was Ball who delivered the address at the funeral of the

Duchess of Cornwall’s father, Major Bruce Shand, in 2006, where mourners included

Charles, William and Harry

 

Against such a background, it is easier to understand why Charles had offered Ball

sanctuary in a Duchy of Cornwall property when, in 1993, the bishop was forced to

resign after being let off with a caution by police over allegations that he indecently

assaulted a 17-year-old novice monk.

Yesterday, after Ball, 83, was finally jailed for this crime — along with other sexual

abuse offences dating back 40 years — the Prince issued a statement denying that

he interfered in the 1993 legal process which resulted in the then bishop escaping

sex abuse charges.

So what is the truth of Charles’s friendship with the prelate who preferred to dress in

the robes of a monk rather than the ceremonial purple of a bishop. And how did it

flourish despite the unsavoury allegations swirling about him?

As we shall see, the Prince of Wales was not the only senior royal figure who knew

and liked Ball. But first it is important to set Peter Ball in context.

The shu#ling old man we saw arriving at the Old Bailey this week, where he was

jailed for 32 months, was something of a celebrity figure in the early 1980s, when

respect for the Church was higher than it is now.

And he was part of a double act with his twin brother, Michael. They founded their

own monastic community, both became bishops (Peter at Lewes then Gloucester,

Michael at Jarrow then Truro)

 

Moar Pedo News

https://prowly-uploads.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/uploads/landing_page_image/image/234458/31f714cc5360357a34ee1b121bb9a287.pdf

Anonymous ID: 343c3f Jan. 6, 2025, 6:18 a.m. No.22301918   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>22301854

Carter appointed her to theCourt of Appeals.

Clinton slithered her in to Supreme. Frens.

 

Heart Attacks can be Deadly.

(Coincidental? Again)

 

Ruth Bader Ginsburg might not have ascended to the Supreme Court if President Carter had not developed a deliberate affirmative action strategy. Barbara Perry explains the significance of Carter’s appointment of Ginsburg to the DC Circuit bench. Perry (@BarbaraPerryUVA) is the Gerald L. Baliles Professor and Director of Presidential Studies at the University of Virginia‘s Miller Center. She was a Supreme Court Fellow at the U.S. Supreme Court in 1994-95, where she received the Tom C. Clark Award as Outstanding Fellow.

 

James Earl Carter will go down in history as one of four unlucky presidents (out of forty-four) who did not appoint a member of the U.S. Supreme Court. Two chief executives (William Henry Harrison and Zachary Taylor) died early in their terms, and Andrew Johnson faced impeachment and a recalcitrant Congress that blocked his nominations. Carter remains the only one-term president to serve without a vacancy occurring on the nation’s highest tribunal. Yet, indirectly, he is responsible for one of the Supreme Court’s most consequential members: Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

 

Carter’s commitment to egalitarianism on matters of race and gender manifested itself in his approach to federal court nominations. He developed an affirmative action plan for the trial courts and the U.S. courts of appeals, the middle tier of the national judiciary. Long a bastion of white males, the ninety-four district courts and thirteen appellate courts form the core of the federal judicial structure. Distributed among a dozen geographic state clusters and the District of Columbia, plus one catch-all circuit, the courts of appeals hear the vast majority of cases from the federal trial courts. All litigants have the right to appeal a loss from the district courts, and, because the Supreme Court’s docket is completely discretionary and contains fewer than 100 cases a term, the courts of appeals are the last stop for all but a few litigants. Thus, Carter’s 262 nominations to the federal benches, a record number at the time, guided by an effort to balance the representative characteristics of appointees, especially in terms of race, ethnicity, and gender, gave him an influential role in shaping the national judiciary.

 

But his most lasting impact resulted from his 1980 decision to name Ruth Bader Ginsburg to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Washington, D.C. Circuit, a proving ground for Supreme Court justices. A stellar graduate of Cornell University and Columbia Law School (after two years at Harvard Law), Ginsburg had served as the director of the ACLU’s Women’s Rights Project, during which she argued a half-dozen gender-equity cases at the U.S. Supreme Court and won all but one between 1971 and 1978.

 

RBG didn’t focus solely on women’s rights, however. Instead, she advocated for the law’s equal treatment of men and women. She successfully argued that the armed forces should pay civilian husbands of military personnel living allowances (as it did wives) and that widowers should receive Social Security benefits to care for their children, as a widowed mother would. This star litigator record, combined with her scholarship as a tenured Columbia Law School professor, caught Carter’s attention.

 

Likewise, her compelling life story captured President Bill Clinton’s imagination in 1993 when Justice Byron White retired from the nation’s highest tribunal. As Clinton’s White House counsel, Bernard Nussbaum, told the Miller Center’s Presidential Oral History team, “She had an activist background, but moderate as a judge. She’d been a judge for twenty [thirteen] years, and she was not known as a flaming liberal or a dark conservative, but very balanced. And she was the right age …. We weren’t these ideologues looking to appoint forty-year-olds that will stay forever. We were looking for people who had lived, balanced people who had a life and a wide range of experience. So she fit those criteria, and it looked like it would be an attractive appointment.” (https://millercenter.org/she-started-crying-phone)

 

In announcing her nomination, Clinton declared that Ginsburg was “to the women’s movement what Thurgood Marshall was to the movement for the rights of African Americans.” Her elegant and eloquent tribute to her mother moved the president to tears. Confirmed by a 96-3 Senate vote, one of the last uncontentious Supreme Court appointments before severe partisan polarization metastasized, Ginsburg was sworn in by Chief Justice William Rehnquist, on August 10, 1993, with her beloved husband Marty, a renowned tax attorney, beaming at her side.

 

moar

https://engagement.virginia.edu/learn/2020/09/24/rbg-jimmy-carters-notorious-judicial-legacy

Anonymous ID: 343c3f Jan. 6, 2025, 6:23 a.m. No.22301932   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1935

>>22301920

"The Posse Comitatus Act, 18 U.S. Code, Section 1385, an original intent of which was to end the use of federal troops [TO POLICE STATE ELECTIONS] in former Confederate states, proscribes the role of the Army and Air Force in executing civil laws and states."

KEY EXCEPTIONS TO THE POSSE COMITATUS ACT

"Pursuant to the presidential power to quell domestic violence, federal troops are expressly exempt from the prohibitions of Posse Comitatus Act, and this exemption applies equally to active-duty military and federalized NATIONAL GUARD troops."

What is Adam Schiff trying to prevent?

Everything you are witnessing [past & present[future]]centrally revolves around the Presidential Election of 2020.

Win by any means necessary [self-preservation].

Q

Anonymous ID: 343c3f Jan. 6, 2025, 7:09 a.m. No.22302083   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>22302065

KEK

His continued gaslighting is surely part of the SHOW. Just like all the other Mil cucks going sideways, he Reeeeeeks of mkultra.

 

Ron Filipkowski is a former federal and state prosecutor. A Marine and former Republican, Filipkowski has amassed a massive following for his reporting exposing those who threaten American democracy. Filipkowski is the editor-in-chief of MeidasTouch.com and co-hosts the hit podcast 'Uncovered' on the MeidasTouch Network.

Anonymous ID: 343c3f Jan. 6, 2025, 7:13 a.m. No.22302098   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2128

>>22302069

We did a dig long ago on the intentional weakening of US Steel.

 

Of course, there's always hidden messages here as well, due to the Christopher STEEL Fake Dossier.

 

CS and Crowdstrike, had Same Initials.

CS