Anonymous ID: 7490a1 Jan. 9, 2025, 5:32 p.m. No.22325870   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6122 >>6153 >>6193 >>6479 >>6529 >>6621 >>6647 >>6649 >>6653

[they] want it to burn just like they want you to die.

 

"So my fear is is that a lot of people are gonna end up getting their $3 million payoff from the fair plan but thatโ€™s only half their house if you get what Iโ€™m saying.

 

And even though a lot of those houses are worth $15-$20 million, the replacement cost is probably about six just because thatโ€™s how real estate is down there."

Anonymous ID: 7490a1 Jan. 9, 2025, 6:18 p.m. No.22326210   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6236

>>22326146

 

  1. destroy dams and their associated reservoirs under the guise of helping native Americans fish for salmon.

 

  1. shut off water from snow melt to agriculture and reservoirs for L.A. under the guise of smelt being trapped in pumps. let the water flow out into the sea instead.

 

  1. Now a situation is created too risky due to wildfire risk that makes insurers unable to profit causing them to flee the state, leaving property owners uninsured.

 

  1. A lack of water allows fires to burn down the uninsured properties, making rebuilding mostly impossible and unaffordable. Add some useful idiot arson to gain some more acres.

 

  1. The same people who started the scam(at #1) now swoop in and low-ball offer the property owners, knowing most will accept.

 

  1. These people now build "rentals" in place of spec. homes in the newly acquired properties.

 

  1. They now rent these back to the previous homeowner.

 

A perfect plan!

Anonymous ID: 7490a1 Jan. 9, 2025, 7:06 p.m. No.22326515   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>22326424

sounds like the opposite of feminine government. because judging the "consequences" is subjective, like DEI or feelings over facts.

 

>based on whether that action itself is right or wrong under a series of rules and principles, rather than based on the consequences of the action.