>>22334633 pb

>you should have the benefits of those protections which include, among other things, the supremacy clause and presidential immunity

See, Merchan knows I am right, notice the supremacy clause? The Supremacy clause is not a benefit to be granted nor taken away. It is a statement that says the US Constitution is the Supreme Law of the land, and it's immutable. No Court, Judge, nor State can override the constitution, which they violated Trump's right to Free Speech, to call witnesses on his behalf, and to provide evidence; which in this case his own testimony.

Let me clarify, Gag orders violate free speech and are illegal. Now here is the kicker, the Free Press won SOTUS case winning back their right to talk about cases but not defendants. So here the mafia press can now be weaponized against any defendant including Trump, because they can influence the cases by their narratives, 24x7. So the claim that the courts put on Gag orders to safeguard the integrity of the case is hypocritical, because they allow the press to be weaponized and defendants to be subjected to the abuses. This was always an excuse and not a reason; to silence resistance to the cabal will.

There is no way any court can stop entirely all the outside influences, so it was an excuse not a reason. You go to court to clarify, and how can a defendant clarify without free speech; they can't and they do this knowingly. The MSM can clarify, the prosecutors and judges can clarify, but not the defendant being accused and in jeopardy. Weaponized lawfare by the courts. Gag orders are illegal and all past cases must be reexamined.