JUSTICE ALITO RULES ON ZACHARY V MOORE V ALLIANT CREDIT UNION FORECLOSURE CASE ON JANUARY 14, 2025
"Today this Court renders a decision of profound constitutional and societal importance. At issue is whether the foreclosure proceedings initiated by Alliant Credit Union against Mr. Zachary Moore, based on a mortgage loan derived from fiat currency, violated his constitutional right under the 5th, 13th and 14th Amendments.
This case also raises broader questions about the legality of a monetary system that facilitates perpetual debt cycles through fiat currency and usury.
After careful consideration we hold that the Foreclosure proceedings as applied to Mr. Moore constitute an unconstitutional deprivation of his rights to property and due process under the 5th and 14th Amendments.
Further, we find that the systemic exploitation inherent in the fiat currency system and its application to the facts of this case violate the foundational principles of Justice enshrined in the Constitution. In the Constitutional context , at the heart of this case lies a mortgage agreement secured by fiat currency currency that is created without backing by tangible assets such as gold or silver.==
…..
The Constitution is clear on matters of monetary integrity and individual rights. Article 1 Section 10 prohibits States from making anything but gold and silver coin a tender in payment of debts. This provision reflects the framer's intent to establish a monetary system grounded in tangible value ensuring fairness and stability in economic transactions.
Moreover,the 5th and 14th Amendments safeguard individuals from governmental deprivation of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.We cannot ignore the systemic exploitation facilitated by the fiat currency system which imposes undue burdens on individuals like Mr. Moore. This system, compounded by the practice of usury creates perpetual cycles of debt that are not only mathematically unsustainable but also morally indefensible.Fiat currency as unconstitutional consideration.
The issue of consideration is foundational to the validity of contracts.A valid contract requires mutual exchange of value; however, fiat currency by its very nature is created out of nothing and lacks the tangible backing required by Article 1? Section10.
Mr Moore's mortgage was based on fiat currency a medium of exchange that contravenes constitutional intent and economic fairness.
We conclude that such a contract lacking valid consideration cannot form the basis for lawful foreclosure proceedings, violations of the 5th and 14th Amendments. The Foreclosure proceedings also implicate Mr. Moore's due process rights. The 5th Amendment prohibits the deprivation of property without due process of law and the 14th Amendment extends this protection to actions by state governments and their instrumentalities. Foreclosure is a significant deprivation of property that requires strict adherence to procedural and substantive fairness in this case. The foreclosure was was initiated without addressing Mr Moore's valid challenge to the underlying mortgage. The lack of a meaningful hearing to contest the validity of the contract constitutes a violation of his due process rights.
Further,the seizure of Mr Moore's home under a void contract amounts to an unconstitutional taking of property for private benefit violating the Takings Clause of the 5th, IV the 13th Amendment and Economic Exploitation.
The 13th Amendment's prohibition of involuntary servitude extends to systems of economic exploitation that coerces individuals into perpetual labor for the benefit of others. The fiat currency system when coupled with usury forces borrowers into unrelenting cycles of debt repayment effectively constituting economic servitude.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kEgqOteDjK4
https://www.tiktok.com/@zachmoore53/video/7459998102271839519