tyb
Focus
The threats are everywhere
A reminder coming next post.
o7
ARCHIVING - THE MOST UPTO DATE ARTICLE ON THE U.K ONLINE SAFETY BILL WHICH A CONTINUATION OF THE IPA (INVESTIGATORY POWERS ACT AKA THE SNOOPERS CHARTER) !!!
Note: Very long article and worth reading, after what happened during covid including the 77th brigade being deployed on the british public, this bill gives the u.k clowns the right to hack every electronic device without permission. It is basically the chinese social credit system without the name, which means banks and service providers can use it to shut down their services to a individual, company or whole areas.
p.s Liberty a company which has fought and lost a court case in the u.k is a apple product which is tied to the B.I.S and used for the Green Finance for the B.I.S which anon has posted about including the video. it enables governments, companies and individuals to buy green bonds which they can buy and sell on the app and also pushes the CO2 agenda which is the climate change grift.
also google, twitter or X now, apple, yahoo and basically every single global tech company are captured by Blackrock and work for the w.e.f, but overall control is by the B.I.S the regulator.
>>19675673, >>19675682, >>19675697, >>19675710 U.K harms bill and its connections to the B.I.S Green Finance NWO agenda - independent article and B.I.S video including anons summary.
https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/19675264.html#19675776
==
Excerpt below
https://www.independent.co.uk/advisor/vpn/online-safety-bill-investigatory-powers-act
The Online Safety Bill and Investigatory Powers Act (snoopers’ charter) update: What you need to know
Written by Rob Binns
Updated August 08, 2023
Verified by Molly Dyson
-–
How does the Investigatory Powers Act affect UK internet users?
When it was first passed, the IPA’s critics accused the UK government of introducing the legislation while the public was preoccupied with the Brexit debacle. Well, whether true or not, it passed – affecting anyone in the UK who’s used the internet since.
So, how does the IPA affect internet users? Let’s sum up its impact on online searches:
More surveillance: the IPA grants UK authorities – including intelligence and law enforcement agencies – the ability to collect and store a wide range of data on internet users, including their browsing history, emails, text messages, and more.
Data retention: the IPA also means the UK government can store this data for up to 12 months. This data doesn’t include the communications content, but it does include information about who you contacted, and when.
Bulk data collection: the IPA allows the UK authorities to gather and analyse large amounts of data en masse – indiscriminately invading the privacy of suspected and innocent internet users alike.
A ‘chilling effect’: in the long-term, the perceptions of increased surveillance and scrutiny the IPA’s presence and proposed updates will cause may lead to a ‘chilling effect’. This happens when internet users, afraid of expressing themselves online without retribution, become more cautious of what they say online – affecting freedom of expression and speech.
An increased technological and financial burden: the IPA’s ongoing influence may lead Internet Service Providers (ISPs) and other technology companies (such as Signal, WhatsApp, and Apple) to invest in new infrastructure to comply. This could lead to increased costs for them – costs that would almost certainly end up getting passed on to consumers.
Heightened cybersecurity concerns: the IPA’s critics argue that the more stringent data retention and collection requirements it imposes may make personal and sensitive information more vulnerable to breaches and malicious cyberattacks.
----
continued in next post.
continued
Who is opposing the Online Safety Bill and Investigatory Powers Act updates?
Apple, Meta (which owns WhatsApp and Facebook) and Signal (an encrypted instant messaging service) have all vehemently opposed the Online Safety Bill, as well as the IPA – and its proposed expansions.
These companies argue that any attempt to scan messages undermines the security and integrity of the end-to-end encryption these apps offer.
Signal and WhatsApp have both threatened to remove their service from the UK altogether, while Apple has already weighed in on the current consultation, laying out that it wouldn’t make changes to its products’ security features for a specific country that would weaken its product for all users.
Apple has also argued that it wouldn’t be possible to make changes to its messaging services’ security features without a software update required – so it couldn’t be done behind closed doors, as the IPA proposes. The company also stated, more broadly, that the IPA’s new additions “constitute a serious and direct threat to data security and information privacy” – not just for people who use Apple’s products and services only in the UK, but around the world (cited by the BBC).
Other notable companies that have spoken out against the Online Safety Bill and snoopers’ charter – and the UK government’s attempts at mass surveillance in general – include:
Yahoo!
Microsoft
Signal’s president Meredith Whittaker has been a particularly vocal critic. Speaking to the BBC, she said the Online Safety Bill’s powers would compel messaging providers to “run government-mandated scanning services on their devices”.
In addition to the tech companies it stands to negatively impact on most (a number estimated to be around 25,000), the snoopers’ charter has also met criticism from a range of UK-based and global human rights, civil liberties, and online privacy advocates, such as Open Rights Group, Privacy International, Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), and Liberty.
The latter, Liberty, is embroiled in an ongoing legal battle with the charter’s dictates. In April 2018, it took a case – The People vs The Snoopers’ Charter, backed by more than £55,000 in public donations – to the High Court, and won. However, the case resurfaced in August 2019, when the High Court did a backflip and deemed that the IPA’s use of bulk warrants to collect and store data were, indeed, lawful. Liberty lost the case.
Liberty is appealing the decision, however, and is set to bring cases against other parts of the charter to court in the coming months and years.
remainder of the article in link below.
link below to b.i.s Green finance including the Liberty apple app for green bonds.
THE GREEN BONDS B.I.S GLOBAL AGENDA !!!
https://rumble.com/embed/v3hu0gm/?pub=4
swordy